Literature DB >> 22836904

Detection of liver metastasis: is diffusion-weighted imaging needed in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging for evaluation of colorectal liver metastases?

Taku Tajima1, Masaaki Akahane, Hidemasa Takao, Hiroyuki Akai, Shigeru Kiryu, Hiroshi Imamura, Yasushi Watanabe, Norihiro Kokudo, Kuni Ohtomo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared diagnostic ability for detecting hepatic metastases between gadolinium ethoxy benzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) on a 1.5-T system, and determined whether DWI is necessary in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for diagnosing colorectal liver metastases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed 29 consecutive prospectively enrolled patients with suspected metachronous colorectal liver metastases; all patients underwent surgery and had preoperative Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. Overall detection rate, sensitivity for detecting metastases and benign lesions, positive predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy (Az value) were compared among three image sets [unenhanced MRI (DWI set), Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI excluding DWI (EOB set), and combined set].
RESULTS: Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI yielded better overall detection rate (77.8-79.0 %) and sensitivity (87.1-89.4 %) for detecting metastases than the DWI set (55.9 % and 64.7 %, respectively) for one observer (P < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was seen between the EOB and combined sets, although several metastases were newly detected on additional DWI.
CONCLUSIONS: Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI yielded a better overall detection rate and higher sensitivity for detecting metastases compared with unenhanced MRI. Additional DWI may be able to reduce oversight of lesions in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced 1.5-T MRI for detecting colorectal liver metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22836904     DOI: 10.1007/s11604-012-0105-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Radiol        ISSN: 1867-1071            Impact factor:   2.374


  28 in total

Review 1.  Contrast agents for MR imaging of the liver.

Authors:  R C Semelka; T K Helmberger
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Hepatic lesion detection: comparison of MR imaging after the administration of superparamagnetic iron oxide with dual-phase CT by using alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Authors:  J Ward; K S Naik; J A Guthrie; D Wilson; P J Robinson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Detection of liver malignancy with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: is addition of diffusion-weighted MRI beneficial?

Authors:  Young Kon Kim; Chong Soo Kim; Young Min Han; Young Hwan Lee
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.350

4.  Comparison of gadolinium-EOB-DTPA-enhanced and diffusion-weighted liver MRI for detection of small hepatic metastases.

Authors:  Kotaro Shimada; Hiroyoshi Isoda; Yuusuke Hirokawa; Shigeki Arizono; Toshiya Shibata; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Distinguishing hepatic metastasis from hemangioma using gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Utaroh Motosugi; Tomoaki Ichikawa; Kojiro Onohara; Hironobu Sou; Katsuhiro Sano; Ali Muhi; Tsutomu Araki
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 6.  Focal liver lesions: MR imaging-pathologic correlation.

Authors:  C Bartolozzi; D Cioni; F Donati; R Lencioni
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) in the oncology patient: value of breathhold DWI compared to unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Russell N Low; Jonathan Gurney
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Detection, classification, and characterization of focal liver lesions: Value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging and the combination of both methods.

Authors:  Konstantin Holzapfel; Matthias J Eiber; Alexander A Fingerle; Melanie Bruegel; Ernst J Rummeny; Jochen Gaa
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2012-02

Review 9.  MR imaging in patients with suspected liver metastases: value of liver-specific contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPA.

Authors:  Christoph J Zech; Karin A Herrmann; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.471

10.  Improved detection of focal liver lesions at MR imaging: multicenter comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images with intraoperative findings.

Authors:  Alexander Huppertz; Thomas Balzer; Anthony Blakeborough; Josy Breuer; Andrea Giovagnoni; Gertraud Heinz-Peer; Michael Laniado; Riccardo M Manfredi; Didier G Mathieu; Dieter Mueller; Peter Reimer; Philip J Robinson; Michael Strotzer; Matthias Taupitz; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  8 in total

1.  Hepatic imaging response to radioembolization with yttrium-90-labeled resin microspheres for tumor progression during systemic chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Andrew S Kennedy; David S Ball; Steven J Cohen; Michael Cohn; Douglas M Coldwell; Alain Drooz; Eduardo Ehrenwald; Samir Kanani; Charles W Nutting; Fred M Moeslein; Samuel G Putnam; Steven C Rose; Michael A Savin; Sabine Schirm; Navesh K Sharma; Eric A Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-12

2.  Comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic MR imaging and contrast-enhanced computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Asato; Masakatsu Tsurusaki; Keitaro Sofue; Yoko Hieda; Takashi Katsube; Kazuhiro Kitajima; Takamichi Murakami
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  A meta-analysis of diffusion-weighted and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging for the detection of liver metastases.

Authors:  Valérie Vilgrain; Maxime Esvan; Maxime Ronot; Aurore Caumont-Prim; Christophe Aubé; Gilles Chatellier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Consensus report from the 7th International Forum for Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Elmar M Merkle; Christoph J Zech; Carlo Bartolozzi; Mustafa R Bashir; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Alexander Huppertz; Jeong Min Lee; Jens Ricke; Michiie Sakamoto; Claude B Sirlin; Sheng-Long Ye; Mengsu Zeng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  MRI characteristics for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant small solitary hypovascular hepatic nodules.

Authors:  Haizhen Qian; Shihong Li; Ming Ji; Guangwu Lin
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.566

6.  Clinical practice guidelines for the management of metastatic colorectal cancer: a consensus statement of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncologists (HeSMO).

Authors:  Christos Dervenis; Evaghelos Xynos; George Sotiropoulos; Nikolaos Gouvas; Ioannis Boukovinas; Christos Agalianos; Nikolaos Androulakis; Athanasios Athanasiadis; Christos Christodoulou; Evangelia Chrysou; Christos Emmanouilidis; Panagiotis Georgiou; Niki Karachaliou; Ourania Katopodi; Panteleimon Kountourakis; Ioannis Kyriazanos; Thomas Makatsoris; Pavlos Papakostas; Demetris Papamichael; George Pechlivanides; Georgios Pentheroudakis; Ioannis Pilpilidis; Joseph Sgouros; Paris Tekkis; Charina Triantopoulou; Maria Tzardi; Vassilis Vassiliou; Louiza Vini; Spyridon Xynogalos; Nikolaos Ziras; John Souglakos
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-03

7.  Clinical added value of MRI to CT in patients scheduled for local therapy of colorectal liver metastases (CAMINO): study protocol for an international multicentre prospective diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  C Verhoef; M G Besselink; J Stoker; B Görgec; I Hansen; G Kemmerich; T Syversveen; M Abu Hilal; E J T Belt; R H C Bisschops; T L Bollen; K Bosscha; M C Burgmans; V Cappendijk; M T De Boer; M D'Hondt; B Edwin; H Gielkens; D J Grünhagen; P Gillardin; P D Gobardhan; H H Hartgrink; K Horsthuis; N F M Kok; P A M Kint; J W H Kruimer; W K G Leclercq; D J Lips; B Lutin; M Maas; H A Marsman; M Morone; J P Pennings; J Peringa; W W Te Riele; M Vermaas; D Wicherts; F E J A Willemssen; B M Zonderhuis; P M M Bossuyt; R J Swijnenburg; Å A Fretland
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Accuracy of [18F]FDG PET/MRI for the Detection of Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Karsten Beiderwellen; Llanos Geraldo; Verena Ruhlmann; Philipp Heusch; Benedikt Gomez; Felix Nensa; Lale Umutlu; Thomas C Lauenstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.