Literature DB >> 11519546

Focal liver lesions: MR imaging-pathologic correlation.

C Bartolozzi1, D Cioni, F Donati, R Lencioni.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance signal intensity of focal liver lesions is affected by numerous pathologic factors. Lesion histologic features, such as cellularity, vascularity, stromal component, and intratumoral necrosis or hemorrhage, strongly affect T1 and T2 relaxation times. Additionally, intracellular content of certain substances, such as glycogen, fat, melanin, iron, and copper, may also have a substantial role in determining MR signal behavior. In this review we discuss the correlations between MR imaging features and pathologic findings in benign and malignant focal liver lesions. Knowledge of imaging-pathology correlations greatly assist in charac terizing focal lesions. Moreover, in certain tumor histotypes, such as hepatocellular carcinoma, careful analysis of lesion signal intensity may help predict the degree of tumor differentiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11519546     DOI: 10.1007/s003300100845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  20 in total

1.  Multifocal epithelioid hemangioendothelioma presenting with hemoptysis.

Authors:  K S Madhusudhan; D N Srivastava; S Gamanagatti
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 2.  [Modern magnetic resonance imaging of the liver].

Authors:  D M Hedderich; K Weiss; D Maintz; T Persigehl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  [Ultrasound contrast agents for liver diagnostics].

Authors:  A-J Lemke; S S Chopra; S M Niehues; R Felix
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Characterization of focal liver lesions by ADC measurements using a respiratory triggered diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar MR imaging technique.

Authors:  Melanie Bruegel; Konstantin Holzapfel; Jochen Gaa; Klaus Woertler; Simone Waldt; Berthold Kiefer; Alto Stemmer; Carl Ganter; Ernst J Rummeny
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Focal liver lesions detection and characterization: The advantages of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI.

Authors:  Stefano Palmucci
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2014-07-27

6.  Detection of liver metastasis: is diffusion-weighted imaging needed in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging for evaluation of colorectal liver metastases?

Authors:  Taku Tajima; Masaaki Akahane; Hidemasa Takao; Hiroyuki Akai; Shigeru Kiryu; Hiroshi Imamura; Yasushi Watanabe; Norihiro Kokudo; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Quantitative proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the normal liver and malignant hepatic lesions at 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  F Fischbach; T Schirmer; M Thormann; T Freund; J Ricke; H Bruhn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Hepatic arterial phase on gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging: a randomized comparison of 0.5 mL/s and 1 mL/s injection rates.

Authors:  Sung Mo Kim; Suk Hee Heo; Jin Woong Kim; Hyo Soon Lim; Sang Soo Shin; Yong Yeon Jeong; Heoung Keun Kang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging relaxation time measurements of the placenta at 1.5 T.

Authors:  C Wright; D M Morris; P N Baker; I P Crocker; P A Gowland; G J Parker; C P Sibley
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Solid focal liver lesions: dynamic and late enhancement patterns with the dual phase contrast agent gadobenate dimeglumine.

Authors:  Luigi Grazioli; Maria Pia Bondioni; Niccolò Faccioli; Sebastiana Gambarini; Rita Tinti; Günther Schneider; Miles Kirchin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2010-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.