Literature DB >> 22836273

Attentional cues affect accuracy and reaction time via different cognitive and neural processes.

Freek van Ede1, Floris P de Lange, Eric Maris.   

Abstract

We investigated whether symbolic endogenous attentional cues affect perceptual accuracy and reaction time (RT) via different cognitive and neural processes. We recorded magnetoencephalography in 19 humans while they performed a cued somatosensory discrimination task in which the cue-target interval was varied between 0 and 1000 ms. Comparing behavioral and neural measures, we show that (1) attentional cueing affects accuracy and RT with different time courses and (2) the time course of our neural measure (anticipatory suppression of neuronal oscillations in stimulus-receiving sensory cortex) only accounts for the accuracy time course. A model is proposed in which the effect on accuracy is explained by a single process (preparatory excitability increase in sensory cortex), whereas the effect on RT is explained by an additional process that is sensitive to cue-target compatibility (post-target comparison between expected and actual stimulus location). These data provide new insights into the mechanisms underlying behavioral consequences of attentional cueing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22836273      PMCID: PMC6703747          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1337-12.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  28 in total

1.  Touch automatically upregulates motor readiness in humans.

Authors:  Freek van Ede; Tobias Winner; Eric Maris
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Stimulus competition mediates the joint effects of spatial and feature-based attention.

Authors:  Alex L White; Martin Rolfs; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Attention drives synchronization of alpha and beta rhythms between right inferior frontal and primary sensory neocortex.

Authors:  Matthew D Sacchet; Roan A LaPlante; Qian Wan; Dominique L Pritchett; Adrian K C Lee; Matti Hämäläinen; Christopher I Moore; Catherine E Kerr; Stephanie R Jones
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Set and setting: how behavioral state regulates sensory function and plasticity.

Authors:  Sara J Aton
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  Dynamic oscillatory processes governing cued orienting and allocation of auditory attention.

Authors:  Jyrki Ahveninen; Samantha Huang; John W Belliveau; Wei-Tang Chang; Matti Hämäläinen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Distinct α- and β-band rhythms over rat somatosensory cortex with similar properties as in humans.

Authors:  Anne M M Fransen; George Dimitriadis; Freek van Ede; Eric Maris
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Dorsal-to-ventral imbalance in the superior longitudinal fasciculus mediates methylphenidate's effect on beta oscillations in ADHD.

Authors:  Cecilia Mazzetti; Christienne Gonzales Damatac; Emma Sprooten; Niels Ter Huurne; Jan K Buitelaar; Ole Jensen
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 4.348

8.  The speed and accuracy of perceptual decisions in a random-tone pitch task.

Authors:  Martijn J Mulder; Max C Keuken; Leendert van Maanen; Wouter Boekel; Birte U Forstmann; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Temporal dynamics underlying the modulation of social status on social attention.

Authors:  Mario Dalmaso; Giovanni Galfano; Carol Coricelli; Luigi Castelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Are accuracy and reaction time affected via different processes?

Authors:  Martijn J Mulder; Leendert van Maanen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.