Literature DB >> 26400256

Touch automatically upregulates motor readiness in humans.

Freek van Ede1, Tobias Winner2, Eric Maris3.   

Abstract

Goal-directed movements require effective integration of tactile input with ongoing movement. Here we investigated the functional consequences of such integration in healthy humans by probing the influence of spatially congruent and incongruent tactile stimuli on performance in a speeded button-press task. In addition, using magnetoencephalography (MEG), we evaluated whether the modulation of somato-motor beta (13-30 Hz) oscillations following tactile input-which has been shown to propagate to motor areas-could underlie this influence. We demonstrate that congruent tactile stimuli, despite being irrelevant to the motor task, lead to both faster and more accurate responses. We further show that this automatic upregulation of lateralized motor readiness 1) is specific to tactile input, 2) is independent of the spatial separation of the hands in peripersonal space, and 3) lasts (and remains facilitatory) for up to a second after the tactile input. This pattern of behavioral results is in line with recent physiological investigations showing that somatosensory and motor areas directly influence each other's processing capacity through joint changes in brain state. At the same time, however, the tactile-induced modulation of beta oscillations (one particular index of such a somato-motor state change) could not account for the observed movement facilitation, because it had a different time course.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automatic facilitation; beta oscillations; movement; sensorimotor integration; tactile stimuli

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26400256      PMCID: PMC4686294          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00504.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  32 in total

Review 1.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Neuromagnetic imaging of cortical oscillations accompanying tactile stimulation.

Authors:  Douglas Cheyne; William Gaetz; Line Garnero; Jean-Philippe Lachaux; Antoine Ducorps; Denis Schwartz; Francisco J Varela
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-10

3.  Multimodal spatial representations engaged in human parietal cortex during both saccadic and manual spatial orienting.

Authors:  Emiliano Macaluso; Jon Driver; Chris D Frith
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Localization of sensorimotor cortical rhythms induced by tactile stimulation using spatially filtered MEG.

Authors:  William Gaetz; Douglas Cheyne
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Prestimulus cortical activity is correlated with speed of visuomotor processing.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Xue Wang; Steven L Bressler; Yonghong Chen; Mingzhou Ding
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: energy summation or preparation enhancement?

Authors:  R S Nickerson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Routes to action in reaction time tasks.

Authors:  C D Frith; D J Done
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1986

8.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 9.  Cortical state and attention.

Authors:  Kenneth D Harris; Alexander Thiele
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data.

Authors:  Robert Oostenveld; Pascal Fries; Eric Maris; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-23
View more
  3 in total

1.  Visual working memory and action: Functional links and bi-directional influences.

Authors:  Freek van Ede
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2020-05-12

2.  Neuronal Oscillations in Various Frequency Bands Differ between Pain and Touch.

Authors:  Georgios Michail; Christian Dresel; Viktor Witkovský; Anne Stankewitz; Enrico Schulz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Saliency Detection as a Reactive Process: Unexpected Sensory Events Evoke Corticomuscular Coupling.

Authors:  Giacomo Novembre; Vijay M Pawar; Rory J Bufacchi; Marina Kilintari; Mandayam Srinivasan; John C Rothwell; Patrick Haggard; Gian Domenico Iannetti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 6.167

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.