BACKGROUND: Maternal exposure to ambient air pollution has been associated with adverse birth outcomes such as preterm delivery. However, only one study to date has linked air pollution to blood pressure changes during pregnancy, a period of dramatic cardiovascular function changes. OBJECTIVES: We examined whether maternal exposures to criteria air pollutants, including particles of less than 10 μm (PM(10)) or 2.5 μm diameter (PM(2.5)), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO(2)), sulfur dioxide (SO(2)), and ozone (O(3)), in each trimester of pregnancy are associated with magnitude of rise of blood pressure between the first 20 weeks of gestation and late pregnancy in a prospectively followed cohort of 1684 pregnant women in Allegheny County, PA. METHODS: Air pollution measures for maternal ZIP code areas were derived using Kriging interpolation. Using logistic regression analysis, we evaluated the associations between air pollution exposures and blood pressure changes between the first 20 weeks of gestation and late pregnancy. RESULTS: First trimester PM(10) and ozone exposures were associated with blood pressure changes between the first 20 weeks of gestation and late pregnancy, most strongly in non-smokers. Per interquartile increases in first trimester PM(10) and O(3) concentrations were associated with mean increases in systolic blood pressure of 1.88 mm Hg (95% CI=0.84 to 2.93) and 1.84 (95% CI=1.05 to 4.63), respectively, and in diastolic blood pressure of 0.63 mm Hg (95% CI=-0.50 to 1.76) and 1.13 (95% CI=-0.46 to 2.71) in non-smokers. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel finding suggests that first trimester PM(10) and O(3) air pollution exposures increase blood pressure in the later stages of pregnancy. These changes may play a role in mediating the relationships between air pollution and adverse birth outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Maternal exposure to ambient air pollution has been associated with adverse birth outcomes such as preterm delivery. However, only one study to date has linked air pollution to blood pressure changes during pregnancy, a period of dramatic cardiovascular function changes. OBJECTIVES: We examined whether maternal exposures to criteria air pollutants, including particles of less than 10 μm (PM(10)) or 2.5 μm diameter (PM(2.5)), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO(2)), sulfur dioxide (SO(2)), and ozone (O(3)), in each trimester of pregnancy are associated with magnitude of rise of blood pressure between the first 20 weeks of gestation and late pregnancy in a prospectively followed cohort of 1684 pregnant women in Allegheny County, PA. METHODS: Air pollution measures for maternal ZIP code areas were derived using Kriging interpolation. Using logistic regression analysis, we evaluated the associations between air pollution exposures and blood pressure changes between the first 20 weeks of gestation and late pregnancy. RESULTS: First trimester PM(10) and ozone exposures were associated with blood pressure changes between the first 20 weeks of gestation and late pregnancy, most strongly in non-smokers. Per interquartile increases in first trimester PM(10) and O(3) concentrations were associated with mean increases in systolic blood pressure of 1.88 mm Hg (95% CI=0.84 to 2.93) and 1.84 (95% CI=1.05 to 4.63), respectively, and in diastolic blood pressure of 0.63 mm Hg (95% CI=-0.50 to 1.76) and 1.13 (95% CI=-0.46 to 2.71) in non-smokers. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel finding suggests that first trimester PM(10) and O(3) air pollution exposures increase blood pressure in the later stages of pregnancy. These changes may play a role in mediating the relationships between air pollution and adverse birth outcomes.
Authors: Edith H van den Hooven; Yvonne de Kluizenaar; Frank H Pierik; Albert Hofman; Sjoerd W van Ratingen; Peter Y J Zandveld; Johan P Mackenbach; Eric A P Steegers; Henk M E Miedema; Vincent W V Jaddoe Journal: Hypertension Date: 2011-01-10 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Radek Bukowski; Gordon C S Smith; Fergal D Malone; Robert H Ball; David A Nyberg; Christine H Comstock; Gary D V Hankins; Richard L Berkowitz; Susan J Gross; Lorraine Dugoff; Sabrina D Craigo; Ilan E Timor-Tritsch; Stephen R Carr; Honor M Wolfe; Mary E D'Alton Journal: BMJ Date: 2007-03-13
Authors: Karen L Jansen; Timothy V Larson; Jane Q Koenig; Therese F Mar; Carrie Fields; Jim Stewart; Morton Lippmann Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Angela Ibald-Mulli; Kirsi L Timonen; Annette Peters; Joachim Heinrich; Gabriele Wölke; Timo Lanki; Gintautas Buzorius; Wolfgang G Kreyling; Jeroen de Hartog; Gerard Hoek; Harry M ten Brink; Juha Pekkanen Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Bruce Urch; Frances Silverman; Paul Corey; Jeffrey R Brook; Karl Z Lukic; Sanjay Rajagopalan; Robert D Brook Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Patricia D Koman; Kelly A Hogan; Natalie Sampson; Rebecca Mandell; Chris M Coombe; Myra M Tetteh; Yolanda R Hill-Ashford; Donele Wilkins; Marya G Zlatnik; Rita Loch-Caruso; Amy J Schulz; Tracey J Woodruff Journal: World Med Health Policy Date: 2018-03-12
Authors: Rong Yang; Dan Luo; Yi-Ming Zhang; Ke Hu; Zheng-Min Qian; Li-Qin Hu; Long-Jiao Shen; Hong Xian; Juliet Iwelunmor; Su-Rong Mei Journal: Curr Med Sci Date: 2019-12-16
Authors: Ashlinn K Quinn; Kenneth Ayuurebobi Ae-Ngibise; Darby W Jack; Ellen Abrafi Boamah; Yeetey Enuameh; Mohammed Nuhu Mujtaba; Steven N Chillrud; Blair J Wylie; Seth Owusu-Agyei; Patrick L Kinney; Kwaku Poku Asante Journal: Int J Hyg Environ Health Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 5.840
Authors: David A Savitz; Beth Elston; Jennifer F Bobb; Jane E Clougherty; Francesca Dominici; Kazuhiko Ito; Sarah Johnson; Tara McAlexander; Zev Ross; Jessie L C Shmool; Thomas D Matte; Gregory A Wellenius Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Shohreh F Farzan; Yu Chen; Fen Wu; Jieying Jiang; Mengling Liu; Emily Baker; Susan A Korrick; Margaret R Karagas Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2015-03-20 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Kristen M Rappazzo; Julie L Daniels; Lynne C Messer; Charles Poole; Danelle T Lobdell Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2014-05-30 Impact factor: 9.031