BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggested a possible association between fine particulate matter air pollution (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and the development of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, but effect sizes have been small and methodologic weaknesses preclude firm conclusions. METHODS: We linked birth certificates in New York City in 2008-2010 to hospital discharge diagnoses and estimated air pollution exposure based on maternal address. The New York City Community Air Survey provided refined estimates of PM2.5 and NO2 at the maternal residence. We estimated the association between exposures to PM2.5 and NO2 in the first and second trimester and risk of gestational hypertension, mild preeclampsia, and severe preeclampsia among 268,601 births. RESULTS: In unadjusted analyses, we found evidence of a positive association between both pollutants and gestational hypertension. However, after adjustment for individual covariates, socioeconomic deprivation, and delivery hospital, we did not find evidence of an association between PM2.5 or NO2 in the first or second trimester and any of the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our data did not provide clear evidence of an effect of ambient air pollution on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Results need to be interpreted with caution considering the quality of the available exposure and health outcome measures and the uncertain impact of adjusting for hospital. Relative to previous studies, which have tended to identify positive associations with PM2.5 and NO2, our large study size, refined air pollution exposure estimates, hospital-based disease ascertainment, and little risk of confounding by socioeconomic deprivation, does not provide evidence for an association.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggested a possible association between fine particulate matter air pollution (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and the development of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, but effect sizes have been small and methodologic weaknesses preclude firm conclusions. METHODS: We linked birth certificates in New York City in 2008-2010 to hospital discharge diagnoses and estimated air pollution exposure based on maternal address. The New York City Community Air Survey provided refined estimates of PM2.5 and NO2 at the maternal residence. We estimated the association between exposures to PM2.5 and NO2 in the first and second trimester and risk of gestational hypertension, mild preeclampsia, and severe preeclampsia among 268,601 births. RESULTS: In unadjusted analyses, we found evidence of a positive association between both pollutants and gestational hypertension. However, after adjustment for individual covariates, socioeconomic deprivation, and delivery hospital, we did not find evidence of an association between PM2.5 or NO2 in the first or second trimester and any of the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our data did not provide clear evidence of an effect of ambient air pollution on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Results need to be interpreted with caution considering the quality of the available exposure and health outcome measures and the uncertain impact of adjusting for hospital. Relative to previous studies, which have tended to identify positive associations with PM2.5 and NO2, our large study size, refined air pollution exposure estimates, hospital-based disease ascertainment, and little risk of confounding by socioeconomic deprivation, does not provide evidence for an association.
Authors: Edith H van den Hooven; Yvonne de Kluizenaar; Frank H Pierik; Albert Hofman; Sjoerd W van Ratingen; Peter Y J Zandveld; Johan P Mackenbach; Eric A P Steegers; Henk M E Miedema; Vincent W V Jaddoe Journal: Hypertension Date: 2011-01-10 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Lisa C Vinikoor-Imler; Simone C Gray; Sharon E Edwards; Marie Lynn Miranda Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2011-12-16 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: Zahra Mobasher; Muhammad T Salam; T Murphy Goodwin; Frederick Lurmann; Sue A Ingles; Melissa L Wilson Journal: Environ Res Date: 2013-03-21 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Ebba Malmqvist; Kristina Jakobsson; Håkan Tinnerberg; Anna Rignell-Hydbom; Lars Rylander Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2013-01-16 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Cande V Ananth; Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou; Yongmei Huang; Zev Ross; Alexander M Friedman; Michelle A Williams; Shuang Wang; Murray A Mittleman; Joel Schwartz Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Patricia D Koman; Kelly A Hogan; Natalie Sampson; Rebecca Mandell; Chris M Coombe; Myra M Tetteh; Yolanda R Hill-Ashford; Donele Wilkins; Marya G Zlatnik; Rita Loch-Caruso; Amy J Schulz; Tracey J Woodruff Journal: World Med Health Policy Date: 2018-03-12
Authors: Emma M Rosen; Mg Isabel Muñoz; Thomas McElrath; David E Cantonwine; Kelly K Ferguson Journal: J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev Date: 2018-12-24 Impact factor: 6.393
Authors: Rong Yang; Dan Luo; Yi-Ming Zhang; Ke Hu; Zheng-Min Qian; Li-Qin Hu; Long-Jiao Shen; Hong Xian; Juliet Iwelunmor; Su-Rong Mei Journal: Curr Med Sci Date: 2019-12-16
Authors: Christine Maric-Bilkan; Vikki M Abrahams; S Sonia Arteaga; Ghada Bourjeily; Kirk P Conrad; Janet M Catov; Maged M Costantine; Brian Cox; Vesna Garovic; Eric M George; Alison D Gernand; Arun Jeyabalan; S Ananth Karumanchi; Aaron D Laposky; Menachem Miodovnik; Megan Mitchell; Victoria L Pemberton; Uma M Reddy; Mark K Santillan; Eleni Tsigas; Kent L R Thornburg; Kenneth Ward; Leslie Myatt; James M Roberts Journal: Hypertension Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 10.190