Mitchell R Goldsworthy1, Julia B Pitcher, Michael C Ridding. 1. Neuromotor Plasticity and Development, The Robinson Institute, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) suppresses the excitability of motor networks responsible for generating motor evoked potentials (MEPs), and may also modulates the excitability of inhibitory motor networks. However, its effects on intracortical inhibition are modest in comparison to the effects on MEPs. The repeated, spaced, application of cTBS protocols results in more MEP suppression than seen with a single cTBS protocol, but whether this approach is also effective at modulating intracortical inhibition has not been tested. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the paired application of cTBS effectively modulates the excitability of intracortical inhibitory motor networks. METHODS: Single and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were used to assess resting motor threshold (RMT), MEP amplitude, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) before and during two time periods (0-10 and 30-40 min) following application of either a single or paired cTBS protocols. RESULTS: Both the single and paired cTBS conditions induced a significant reduction in both MEP amplitudes and the level of SICI. While paired cTBS produced a significantly greater MEP suppression than single cTBS, the effects on SICI were similar. Neither single nor paired cTBS had an effect on RMT or LICI. CONCLUSIONS: Although the repeated application of cTBS protocols may be effective for enhancing modulation of the MEP-generating excitatory motor networks, these findings suggest that this approach offers little advantage when targeting intracortical inhibitory networks.
BACKGROUND: Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) suppresses the excitability of motor networks responsible for generating motor evoked potentials (MEPs), and may also modulates the excitability of inhibitory motor networks. However, its effects on intracortical inhibition are modest in comparison to the effects on MEPs. The repeated, spaced, application of cTBS protocols results in more MEP suppression than seen with a single cTBS protocol, but whether this approach is also effective at modulating intracortical inhibition has not been tested. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the paired application of cTBS effectively modulates the excitability of intracortical inhibitory motor networks. METHODS: Single and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were used to assess resting motor threshold (RMT), MEP amplitude, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) before and during two time periods (0-10 and 30-40 min) following application of either a single or paired cTBS protocols. RESULTS: Both the single and paired cTBS conditions induced a significant reduction in both MEP amplitudes and the level of SICI. While paired cTBS produced a significantly greater MEP suppression than single cTBS, the effects on SICI were similar. Neither single nor paired cTBS had an effect on RMT or LICI. CONCLUSIONS: Although the repeated application of cTBS protocols may be effective for enhancing modulation of the MEP-generating excitatory motor networks, these findings suggest that this approach offers little advantage when targeting intracortical inhibitory networks.
Authors: Sung Wook Chung; Nigel C Rogasch; Kate E Hoy; Caley M Sullivan; Robin F H Cash; Paul B Fitzgerald Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Brenton Hordacre; Duncan Austin; Katlyn E Brown; Lynton Graetz; Isabel Pareés; Stefania De Trane; Ann-Maree Vallence; Simon Koblar; Timothy Kleinig; Michelle N McDonnell; Richard Greenwood; Michael C Ridding; John C Rothwell Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2021-02-12 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Hamed Ekhtiari; Hosna Tavakoli; Giovanni Addolorato; Chris Baeken; Antonello Bonci; Salvatore Campanella; Luis Castelo-Branco; Gaëlle Challet-Bouju; Vincent P Clark; Eric Claus; Pinhas N Dannon; Alessandra Del Felice; Tess den Uyl; Marco Diana; Massimo di Giannantonio; John R Fedota; Paul Fitzgerald; Luigi Gallimberti; Marie Grall-Bronnec; Sarah C Herremans; Martin J Herrmann; Asif Jamil; Eman Khedr; Christos Kouimtsidis; Karolina Kozak; Evgeny Krupitsky; Claus Lamm; William V Lechner; Graziella Madeo; Nastaran Malmir; Giovanni Martinotti; William M McDonald; Chiara Montemitro; Ester M Nakamura-Palacios; Mohammad Nasehi; Xavier Noël; Masoud Nosratabadi; Martin Paulus; Mauro Pettorruso; Basant Pradhan; Samir K Praharaj; Haley Rafferty; Gregory Sahlem; Betty Jo Salmeron; Anne Sauvaget; Renée S Schluter; Carmen Sergiou; Alireza Shahbabaie; Christine Sheffer; Primavera A Spagnolo; Vaughn R Steele; Ti-Fei Yuan; Josanne D M van Dongen; Vincent Van Waes; Ganesan Venkatasubramanian; Antonio Verdejo-García; Ilse Verveer; Justine W Welsh; Michael J Wesley; Katie Witkiewitz; Fatemeh Yavari; Mohammad-Reza Zarrindast; Laurie Zawertailo; Xiaochu Zhang; Yoon-Hee Cha; Tony P George; Flavio Frohlich; Anna E Goudriaan; Shirley Fecteau; Stacey B Daughters; Elliot A Stein; Felipe Fregni; Michael A Nitsche; Abraham Zangen; Marom Bikson; Colleen A Hanlon Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Nga Yan Tse; Mitchell R Goldsworthy; Michael C Ridding; James P Coxon; Paul B Fitzgerald; Alex Fornito; Nigel C Rogasch Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 4.379