Literature DB >> 22834564

Reliance on pollinators predicts defensive chemistry across tobacco species.

Lynn S Adler1, Megan G Seifert, Michael Wink, Geoffrey E Morse.   

Abstract

Defensive traits are typically studied in the context of avoiding antagonists, but may also mediate key interactions with mutualists. Plant chemical defences occur in flowers, suggesting pollinators may be agents of selection on defence. We hypothesised that floral defences would deter pollinators, and therefore, pollinators would select for lower defences in outcrossing than self-pollinating species. We measured pollinator reliance and alkaloid levels in 32 greenhouse-grown Nicotiana species. Using a comparative phylogenetic approach, we found significantly lower nectar, floral and leaf nicotine concentrations in outcrossing than selfing species, with a 15-fold decrease in leaf nicotine levels. Nicotine concentrations were positively correlated across tissues, suggesting that selection against floral defences could constrain the evolution of leaf defences. Thus, pollinators could shape the evolution not only of floral defences but also of defences in other tissues where herbivores have traditionally been considered the dominant agent of selection.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22834564     DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01838.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  30 in total

1.  Difference in defense strategy in flower heads and leaves of Asteraceae: multiple-species approach.

Authors:  Michio Oguro; Satoki Sakai
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Stochastic eco-evolutionary model of a prey-predator community.

Authors:  Manon Costa; Céline Hauzy; Nicolas Loeuille; Sylvie Méléard
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Detoxification and elimination of nicotine by nectar-feeding birds.

Authors:  S Lerch-Henning; E E Du Rand; S W Nicolson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.200

Review 4.  Evolutionary ecology of nectar.

Authors:  Amy L Parachnowitsch; Jessamyn S Manson; Nina Sletvold
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Plant mating system transitions drive the macroevolution of defense strategies.

Authors:  Stuart A Campbell; André Kessler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Nectar Attracts Foraging Honey Bees with Components of Their Queen Pheromones.

Authors:  Fanglin Liu; Jie Gao; Nayan Di; Lynn S Adler
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Chemical defense lowers plant competitiveness.

Authors:  Daniel J Ballhorn; Adrienne L Godschalx; Savannah M Smart; Stefanie Kautz; Martin Schädler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Herbivory and Time Since Flowering Shape Floral Rewards and Pollinator-Pathogen Interactions.

Authors:  Luis A Aguirre; Julie K Davis; Philip C Stevenson; Lynn S Adler
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Lotus japonicus flowers are defended by a cyanogenic β-glucosidase with highly restricted expression to essential reproductive organs.

Authors:  Daniela Lai; Martina Pičmanová; Maher Abou Hachem; Mohammed Saddik Motawia; Carl Erik Olsen; Birger Lindberg Møller; Fred Rook; Adam M Takos
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.076

10.  Immediate effects of nectar robbing by Palestine sunbirds (Nectarinia osea) on nectar alkaloid concentrations in tree tobacco (Nicotiana glauca).

Authors:  Rainee L Kaczorowski; Avi Koplovich; Frank Sporer; Michael Wink; Shai Markman
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.