Literature DB >> 22834397

The impact of the type and configuration of abutments and their (repeated) removal on the attachment level and marginal bone.

Eric Rompen1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The quality and stability of the soft tissue-implant interface is most likely of paramount importance for the preservation of marginal bone and for the long-term prognosis of oral implants. The aim of the present review was to screen existing data in the literature concerning the influence of transmucosal components' composition, type, design and disconnection on peri-implant tissues.
RESULTS: The influence of the type of implant system (one-piece or soft tissue level implants versus two-piece or bone level implants) has been poorly studied in humans, and data from animal studies are controversial; both concepts demonstrated comparable long-term stability of peri-implant tissues. The chemical composition of abutments has been mostly studied in animals, with the conclusion that only a few materials (namely titanium, aluminium and zirconium oxides) allow the proper formation of a soft tissue interface. However, there is a severe lack of information about the clinical impact of this parameter, as well as of surface contamination of abutments. Mobility of transmucosal components has been shown to increase marginal bone loss in animals, while the influence of abutment disconnection is more controversial. Only one clinical study suggests that a 'one abutment-one time' technique preserves marginal bone. Studies investigating the influence of platform switching suggest that using an abutment narrower than the implant's platform could have a positive effect on the fate of marginal bone. But those studies are extremely heterogenous and their results controversial.
CONCLUSION: There is still a severe lack of information about the clinical impact of implant type, of implant/abutment connection, and of abutment composition and stability on peri-implant bone remodelling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22834397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 1756-2406            Impact factor:   3.123


  10 in total

1.  A new method using insert-based systems (IBS) to improve cell behavior study on flexible and rigid biomaterials.

Authors:  Charlotte Grenade; Nicolas Moniotte; Eric Rompen; Alain Vanheusden; Amélie Mainjot; Marie-Claire De Pauw-Gillet
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  Effect Morphology and Surface Treatment of the Abutments of Dental Implants on the Dimension and Health of Peri-Implant Biological Space.

Authors:  Ibrahim Dib-Zaitum; Yasmina Guadilla-González; Javier Flores-Fraile; Juan Dib-Zakkour; Lorena Benito-Garzón; Javier Montero
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.748

3.  Cross-sectional evaluation of clinical and immunological parameters at partially microgrooved vs machined abutments in humans.

Authors:  Gerhard Iglhaut; Sebastian Salomon; Tobias Fretwurst; Peter Thomas; Janina Endres; Selina Kessler; Burkhard Summer
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-05-25

4.  Interaction of titanium, zirconia and lithium disilicate with peri-implant soft tissue: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Katharina Kuhn; Heike Rudolph; Michael Graf; Matthias Moldan; Shaoxia Zhou; Martin Udart; Andrea Böhmler; Ralph G Luthardt
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 5.  One-time versus repeated abutment connection for platform-switched implant: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qing-Qing Wang; Ruoxi Dai; Chris Ying Cao; Hui Fang; Min Han; Quan-Li Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Peri-Implant Tissue Adaptation after Implant Rehabilitation with Shoulderless Abutments with 24 Months of Follow-Up.

Authors:  Luca Casula; Alex Gillone; Davide Musu
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2021-01-07

7.  Laser microgrooved vs. machined healing abutment disconnection/reconnection: a comparative clinical, radiographical and biochemical study with split-mouth design.

Authors:  Renzo Guarnieri; Gabriele Miccoli; Rodolfo Reda; Alessandro Mazzoni; Dario Di Nardo; Luca Testarelli
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-03-17

8.  An In-Vitro Analysis of Peri-Implant Mucosal Seal Following Photofunctionalization of Zirconia Abutment Materials.

Authors:  Masfueh Razali; Wei Cheong Ngeow; Ros Anita Omar; Wen Lin Chai
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-01-15

9.  Osteoblast integration of dental implant materials after challenge by sub-gingival pathogens: a co-culture study in vitro.

Authors:  Bingran Zhao; Henny C van der Mei; Minie Rustema-Abbing; Henk J Busscher; Yijin Ren
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 6.344

Review 10.  Effects of modified abutment characteristics on peri-implant soft tissue health: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ignacio Sanz-Martín; Ignacio Sanz-Sánchez; Ana Carrillo de Albornoz; Elena Figuero; Mariano Sanz
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 5.977

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.