Literature DB >> 22834396

Mechanical, chemical and laser treatments of the implant surface in the presence of marginal bone loss around implants.

Joerg Meyle1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this review was to summarise current evidence with regard to the decontamination of implant surfaces by mechanical, chemical and physical methods in the presence of marginal bone loss arising from peri-implant infections.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PubMed search identified studies and publications dealing with 'peri-implantitis', 'treatment', 'surface decontamination', 'laser application' 'air-abrasive treatment' and 'photodynamic therapy'. Only studies in international peer-reviewed journals were selected for further evaluation; case reports were not included.
RESULTS: Several therapeutic approaches were identified such as mechanical treatment, antiseptics and air-abrasive treatment, photodynamic treatment, and laser applications. Since treatment of infected surfaces with air-powder +/- citric acid, gauze soaked with saline + citric acid or gauze soaked with chlorhexidine led to similar results in experimental studies, cotton pellets with saline may be adequate for cleaning micro-rough surfaces. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy can effectively reduce the prevalence of pathogens on implant surfaces, but the clinical benefits remain unknown. The increase in temperature of the implant surface caused by the CO2 laser poses a risk. The Er:YAG laser is considered to possess the best properties for implant surface decontamination. In vivo, no single method of surface decontamination (chemical agents, air abrasives or lasers) was found to be superior. In several animal experiments, thorough cleaning of the infected implant surfaces and implantation of these previously infected devices into freshly prepared sites resulted in re-osseointegration, while currently there are no controlled clinical trials where re-osseointegration has been demonstrated in patients.
CONCLUSIONS: For decontamination of the infected implant surfaces, rinsing with saline (or cleaning with cotton pellets soaked with sterile saline) and air-abrasive treatment seem to work. Laser decontamination of the surface does not improve healing results. Non-surgical therapy of implants with peri-implantitis does not lead to successful treatment outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22834396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 1756-2406            Impact factor:   3.123


  12 in total

1.  The effects of Er:YAG on the treatment of peri-implantitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Mingdong Yan; Miaomiao Liu; Min Wang; Fengying Yin; Haibin Xia
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 2.  The efficiency of laser application on the enamel surface: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maryam Karandish
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2014

3.  Treatment outcome following use of the erbium, chromium:yttrium, scandium, gallium, garnet laser in the non-surgical management of peri-implantitis: a case series.

Authors:  R Al-Falaki; M Cronshaw; F J Hughes
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Mesenchymal stromal cell and osteoblast responses to oxidized titanium surfaces pre-treated with λ = 808 nm GaAlAs diode laser or chlorhexidine: in vitro study.

Authors:  Flaminia Chellini; Marco Giannelli; Alessia Tani; Lara Ballerini; Larissa Vallone; Daniele Nosi; Sandra Zecchi-Orlandini; Chiara Sassoli
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Titanium particles: An emerging risk factor for peri-implant bone loss.

Authors:  Zoë Berryman; Laura Bridger; Haizal Mohd Hussaini; Alison M Rich; Momen Atieh; Andrew Tawse-Smith
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2019-10-08

6.  Bacterial reduction effect of four different dental lasers on titanium surfaces in vitro.

Authors:  W Patrick Misischia; Pinelopi Xenoudi; Raymond A Yukna; Michael J Schurr
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Peri-implantitis. Part 3: current modes of management.

Authors:  A Alani; K Bishop
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.626

8.  Implant decontamination with phosphoric acid during surgical peri-implantitis treatment: a RCT.

Authors:  Diederik F M Hentenaar; Yvonne C M De Waal; Hans Strooker; Henny J A Meijer; Arie-Jan Van Winkelhoff; Gerry M Raghoebar
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2017-07-17

9.  Detoxification of implant surfaces affected by peri-implant disease: an overview of surgical methods.

Authors:  Pilar Valderrama; Thomas G Wilson
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2013-08-04

10.  Detoxification of Implant Surfaces Affected by Peri-Implant Disease: An Overview of Non-surgical Methods.

Authors:  Pilar Valderrama; Jonathan A Blansett; Mayra G Gonzalez; Myrna G Cantu; Thomas G Wilson
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2014-05-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.