Literature DB >> 22833779

A review of statistical methods for protein identification using tandem mass spectrometry.

Oliver Serang1, William Noble.   

Abstract

Tandem mass spectrometry has emerged as a powerful tool for the characterization of complex protein samples, an increasingly important problem in biology. The effort to efficiently and accurately perform inference on data from tandem mass spectrometry experiments has resulted in several statistical methods. We use a common framework to describe the predominant methods and discuss them in detail. These methods are classified using the following categories: set cover methods, iterative methods, and Bayesian methods. For each method, we analyze and evaluate the outcome and methodology of published comparisons to other methods; we use this comparison to comment on the qualities and weaknesses, as well as the overall utility, of all methods. We discuss the similarities between these methods and suggest directions for the field that would help unify these similar assumptions in a more rigorous manner and help enable efficient and reliable protein inference.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22833779      PMCID: PMC3402235          DOI: 10.4310/sii.2012.v5.n1.a2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Interface        ISSN: 1938-7989            Impact factor:   0.582


  31 in total

1.  Correctness of local probability in graphical models with loops.

Authors:  Y Weiss
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search.

Authors:  Andrew Keller; Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Eugene Kolker; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  A method for reducing the time required to match protein sequences with tandem mass spectra.

Authors:  Robertson Craig; Ronald C Beavis
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 4.  The ABC's (and XYZ's) of peptide sequencing.

Authors:  Hanno Steen; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 94.444

5.  Computational prediction of proteotypic peptides for quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Parag Mallick; Markus Schirle; Sharon S Chen; Mark R Flory; Hookeun Lee; Daniel Martin; Jeffrey Ranish; Brian Raught; Robert Schmitt; Thilo Werner; Bernhard Kuster; Ruedi Aebersold
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-12-31       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  A hierarchical statistical model to assess the confidence of peptides and proteins inferred from tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Changyu Shen; Zhiping Wang; Ganesh Shankar; Xiang Zhang; Lang Li
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Emergence of novel color vision in mice engineered to express a human cone photopigment.

Authors:  Gerald H Jacobs; Gary A Williams; Hugh Cahill; Jeremy Nathans
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  A survey of computational methods and error rate estimation procedures for peptide and protein identification in shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  Alexey I Nesvizhskii
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 4.044

9.  Efficient marginalization to compute protein posterior probabilities from shotgun mass spectrometry data.

Authors:  Oliver Serang; Michael J MacCoss; William Stafford Noble
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Spectral probabilities and generating functions of tandem mass spectra: a strike against decoy databases.

Authors:  Sangtae Kim; Nitin Gupta; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 4.466

View more
  29 in total

1.  Nonparametric Bayesian evaluation of differential protein quantification.

Authors:  Oliver Serang; A Ertugrul Cansizoglu; Lukas Käll; Hanno Steen; Judith A Steen
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.466

2.  Drift time-specific collision energies enable deep-coverage data-independent acquisition proteomics.

Authors:  Ute Distler; Jörg Kuharev; Pedro Navarro; Yishai Levin; Hansjörg Schild; Stefan Tenzer
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  A Scalable Approach for Protein False Discovery Rate Estimation in Large Proteomic Data Sets.

Authors:  Mikhail M Savitski; Mathias Wilhelm; Hannes Hahne; Bernhard Kuster; Marcus Bantscheff
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Bayesian proteoform modeling improves protein quantification of global proteomic measurements.

Authors:  Bobbie-Jo M Webb-Robertson; Melissa M Matzke; Susmita Datta; Samuel H Payne; Jiyun Kang; Lisa M Bramer; Carrie D Nicora; Anil K Shukla; Thomas O Metz; Karin D Rodland; Richard D Smith; Mark F Tardiff; Jason E McDermott; Joel G Pounds; Katrina M Waters
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.911

5.  Mass spectrometry-based protein identification with accurate statistical significance assignment.

Authors:  Gelio Alves; Yi-Kuo Yu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 6.  Improving protein identification from tandem mass spectrometry data by one-step methods and integrating data from other platforms.

Authors:  Sinjini Sikdar; Ryan Gill; Susmita Datta
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 11.622

7.  Quantitative Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics: An Overview.

Authors:  Svitlana Rozanova; Katalin Barkovits; Miroslav Nikolov; Carla Schmidt; Henning Urlaub; Katrin Marcus
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

8.  A non-parametric cutout index for robust evaluation of identified proteins.

Authors:  Oliver Serang; Joao Paulo; Hanno Steen; Judith A Steen
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Full-Featured Search Algorithm for Negative Electron-Transfer Dissociation.

Authors:  Nicholas M Riley; Marshall Bern; Michael S Westphall; Joshua J Coon
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Recognizing uncertainty increases robustness and reproducibility of mass spectrometry-based protein inferences.

Authors:  Oliver Serang; Luminita Moruz; Michael R Hoopmann; Lukas Käll
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 4.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.