Literature DB >> 22833558

Psychosocial risk assessment: French validation of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ).

Emilie Dupret1, Christine Bocéréan, Mardjane Teherani, Martine Feltrin, Jan Hyld Pejtersen.   

Abstract

AIMS: This study presents a French version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) and analyses its psychometric properties for the purpose of validation. The questionnaire assesses psychosocial risk factors at work. The French questionnaire (derived from the Danish short version) is composed of 32 items grouped into 17 scales measuring five domains and eight additional questions assessing aggressive behaviour at work.
METHOD: The questionnaire was administered to 935 employees of a large firm in the Parisian area.
RESULTS: All psychometric analyses performed (internal consistency of the scales, exploratory factor analysis, concurrent validity analysis) gave satisfactory results and demonstrated the validity of the French COPSOQ.
CONCLUSIONS: A new questionnaire is now available in French. A large body of data is currently being gathered in view of comparing occupations and types of firms using this new instrument.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22833558     DOI: 10.1177/1403494812453888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Public Health        ISSN: 1403-4948            Impact factor:   3.021


  17 in total

1.  Quantifying Multiple Work-Related Psychosocial Risk Factors: Proposal for a Composite Indicator Based on the COPSOQ II.

Authors:  Adrienne Stauder; Katalin Nistor; Tünde Zakor; Anita Szabó; Anikó Nistor; Szilvia Ádám; Barna Konkolÿ Thege
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2017-12

2.  Is the effect of work-related psychosocial exposure on depressive and anxiety disorders short-term, lagged or cumulative?

Authors:  Stéphanie Boini; Martin Kolopp; Michel Grzebyk; Guy Hédelin; Dominique Chouanière
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Effects of a Multimodal Program Including Simulation on Job Strain Among Nurses Working in Intensive Care Units: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Radia El Khamali; Atika Mouaci; Sabine Valera; Marion Cano-Chervel; Camille Pinglis; Céline Sanz; Amel Allal; Valérie Attard; Julie Malardier; Magali Delfino; Fifina D'Anna; Pierre Rostini; Stéphan Aguilard; Karine Berthias; Béatrice Cresta; Frédéric Iride; Valérie Reynaud; Jérémie Suard; Wlady Syja; Cécile Vankiersbilck; Nicole Chevalier; Karen Inthavong; Jean-Marie Forel; Karine Baumstarck; Laurent Papazian
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in a large sample of French employees.

Authors:  Christine Bocéréan; Emilie Dupret
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.630

5.  Measuring psychosocial exposures: validation of the Persian of the copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire (COPSOQ).

Authors:  Omid Pournik; Leila Ghalichi; Alireza TehraniYazdi; Seyed Mohammad Tabatabaee; Mostafa Ghaffari; Eva Vingard
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2015-06-13

6.  The Iranian version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) for assessment of psychological risk factors at work.

Authors:  Mohammad Aminian; Iman Dianat; Anvar Miri; Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi
Journal:  Health Promot Perspect       Date:  2016-12-18

7.  The Portuguese long version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire II (COPSOQ II) - a validation study.

Authors:  Susel Rosário; Luís F Azevedo; João A Fonseca; Albert Nienhaus; Matthias Nübling; José Torres da Costa
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.646

8.  Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire - A validation study using the Job Demand-Resources model.

Authors:  Hanne Berthelsen; Jari J Hakanen; Hugo Westerlund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Malay Validation of Copenhagen Psychosocial Work Environment Questionnaire in Context of Second Generation Statistical Techniques.

Authors:  Ahmad Shahrul Nizam Isha; Muhammad Umair Javaid; Amir Zaib Abbasi; Sobia Bano; Muhammad Zahid; Mumtaz Ali Memon; Umair Rehman; Matthias Nübling; Asrar Ahmed Sabir; Saif Ur Rehman; Nazish Imtiaz
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  The Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire.

Authors:  Hermann Burr; Hanne Berthelsen; Salvador Moncada; Matthias Nübling; Emilie Dupret; Yucel Demiral; John Oudyk; Tage S Kristensen; Clara Llorens; Albert Navarro; Hans-Joachim Lincke; Christine Bocéréan; Ceyda Sahan; Peter Smith; Anne Pohrt
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2019-11-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.