Literature DB >> 22833533

Promotion orientation explains why future-oriented people exercise and eat healthy: evidence from the two-factor consideration of future consequences-14 scale.

Jeff Joireman1, Monte J Shaffer, Daniel Balliet, Alan Strathman.   

Abstract

The authors extended research linking individual differences in consideration of future consequences (CFC) with health behaviors by (a) testing whether individual differences in regulatory focus would mediate that link and (b) highlighting the value of a revised, two-factor CFC-14 scale with subscales assessing concern with future consequences (CFC-Future) and concern with immediate consequences (CFC-Immediate) proper. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the revised CFC-14 scale supported the presence of two highly reliable factors (CFC-Future and CFC-Immediate; αs from .80 to .84). Moreover, structural equation modeling showed that those high in CFC-Future engage in exercise and healthy eating because they adopt a promotion orientation. Future use of the two-factor CFC-14 scale is encouraged to shed additional light on how concern with future and concern with immediate consequences (proper) differentially impact the way people resolve a host of intertemporal dilemmas (e.g., health, financial, and environmental behavior).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22833533     DOI: 10.1177/0146167212449362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0146-1672


  38 in total

1.  Psychological mechanisms associated with food security status and BMI in adults: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Candice A Myers; Robbie A Beyl; Corby K Martin; Stephanie T Broyles; Peter T Katzmarzyk
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 4.022

2.  Success in School for Justice-Involved Girls: Do Specific Aspects of Developmental Immaturity Matter?

Authors:  Emily Haney-Caron; Naomi E S Goldstein; Christy L Giallella; Kathleen Kemp; Christina Riggs Romaine
Journal:  Int J Forensic Ment Health       Date:  2016-03-17

3.  Risk-Taking, Delay Discounting, and Time Perspective in Adolescent Gamblers: An Experimental Study.

Authors:  Marina Cosenza; Mark D Griffiths; Giovanna Nigro; Maria Ciccarelli
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2017-06

4.  Physical activity and time preference.

Authors:  Vasilios D Kosteas
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2015-06-19

5.  Health Risk Behaviour Inventory Validation and its Association with Self-regulatory Dispositions.

Authors:  Alessandra Monni; L Francesca Scalas
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2022-01-31

6.  Targeting self-regulation to promote health behaviors in children.

Authors:  Alison L Miller; Ashley N Gearhardt; Emily M Fredericks; Benjamin Katz; Lilly Fink Shapiro; Kelsie Holden; Niko Kaciroti; Richard Gonzalez; Christine Hunter; Julie C Lumeng
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2017-09-28

7.  Effects of Environmental Worry on Fruit and Vegetable Intake.

Authors:  Lei Zheng; Aleksandra Luszczynska; Miao Miao; Yidi Chen; Yiqun Gan
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2021-08-02

8.  A regulatory focus perspective on eating behavior: how prevention and promotion focus relates to emotional, external, and restrained eating.

Authors:  Stefan Pfattheicher; Claudia Sassenrath
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-20

9.  Adolescent Time and Risk Preferences: Measurement, Determinants and Field Consequences.

Authors:  Anya Samek; Andre Gray; Ashlesha Datar; Nancy Nicosia
Journal:  J Econ Behav Organ       Date:  2021-02-27

Review 10.  The Role of User Behaviour in Improving Cyber Security Management.

Authors:  Ahmed A Moustafa; Abubakar Bello; Alana Maurushat
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.