Literature DB >> 32597739

Psychological mechanisms associated with food security status and BMI in adults: a mixed methods study.

Candice A Myers1, Robbie A Beyl1, Corby K Martin1, Stephanie T Broyles1, Peter T Katzmarzyk1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined psychological constructs (delay discounting, grit, future time perspective and subjective social status) in relation to food security status and body weight.
DESIGN: A simultaneous triangulation mixed methods design was used to collect quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data were collected in fifty-six adults. Independent variables included food security status (food secure or food insecure) and BMI category (normal weight or overweight/obese). Participants, matched on race (African American and White), were categorised into four food security status by BMI category groups. Psychological constructs were measured via validated questionnaires. Qualitative data were collected in a subsample of twelve participants via in-depth interviews.
SETTING: This study was conducted in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. PARTICIPANTS: The sample was 66 % female and 48 % African American with a mean age of 32·3 (sd 9·2) years and BMI of 28·8 (sd 7·7) kg/m2.
RESULTS: Quantitative results showed that food-insecure participants with overweight/obesity had greater delay discounting (-3·78 v. -6·16, P = 0·01; -3·78 v. -5·75, P = 0·02) and poorer grit (3·37 v. 3·99, P = 0·02; 3·37 v. 4·02, P = 0·02 ) than their food-secure counterparts and food-insecure participants with normal weight. Food-insecure participants with overweight/obesity also had a shorter time period for financial planning (0·72 v. 4·14, P = 0·02) than food-secure participants with normal weight. Qualitative data largely supported quantitative findings with participants discussing varied perceptions of psychological constructs.
CONCLUSIONS: This study found differences in delaying gratification, grit and financial planning between food security status and body weight groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI; Delay discounting; Food security; Future time perspective; Grit; Psychological mechanisms; Subjective social status

Year:  2020        PMID: 32597739      PMCID: PMC7483214          DOI: 10.1017/S1368980020000889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nutr        ISSN: 1368-9800            Impact factor:   4.022


  41 in total

1.  The Association between Food Insecurity and Diet Quality Varies by Race/Ethnicity: An Analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011-2014 Results.

Authors:  Cindy W Leung; June M Tester
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 4.910

Review 2.  Food insecurity and chronic disease.

Authors:  Barbara A Laraia
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 8.701

3.  No food for thought: moderating effects of delay discounting and future time perspective on the relation between income and food insecurity.

Authors:  Leonard H Epstein; Noelle Jankowiak; Henry Lin; Rocco Paluch; Mikhail N Koffarnus; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Automating Scoring of Delay Discounting for the 21- and 27-Item Monetary Choice Questionnaires.

Authors:  Brent A Kaplan; Michael Amlung; Derek D Reed; David P Jarmolowicz; Todd L McKerchar; Shea M Lemley
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2016-08-19

5.  Does hunger cause obesity?

Authors:  W H Dietz
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Dietary behaviors mediate the association between food insecurity and obesity among socioeconomically disadvantaged youth.

Authors:  Chang-Han Wu; Chung-Ying Lin; Yi-Ping Hsieh; Carol Strong; Camilla Meshki; Yi-Ching Lin; Meng-Che Tsai
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  Food insecurity is positively related to overweight in women.

Authors:  M S Townsend; J Peerson; B Love; C Achterberg; S P Murphy
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Food insecurity and cardiovascular health: Findings from a statewide population health survey in Wisconsin.

Authors:  Augustine M Saiz; Allison M Aul; Kristen M Malecki; Andrew J Bersch; Rachel S Bergmans; Tamara J LeCaire; F Javier Nieto
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Bleak Present, Bright Future: Online Episodic Future Thinking, Scarcity, Delay Discounting, and Food Demand.

Authors:  Yan Yan Sze; Jeffrey S Stein; Warren K Bickel; Rocco A Paluch; Leonard H Epstein
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-05-02

10.  Accumulating Data to Optimally Predict Obesity Treatment (ADOPT) Core Measures: Psychosocial Domain.

Authors:  Angelina R Sutin; Kerri Boutelle; Susan M Czajkowski; Elissa S Epel; Paige A Green; Christine M Hunter; Elise L Rice; David M Williams; Deborah Young-Hyman; Alexander J Rothman
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.002

View more
  1 in total

1.  The effect of food insecurity and stress on delay discounting across families: a COVID-19 natural experiment.

Authors:  Amanda K Crandall; Nayana Madhudi; Bernadette Osborne; Autum Carter; Aliaya K Williams; Jennifer L Temple
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.135

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.