OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of obesity and how accurately standard anthropometric measures identify obesity among men and women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was performed for 141 persons with RA (56 men and 85 women). Two anthropometric proxies of obesity (body mass index [BMI] and waist circumference [WC]) were compared to a DXA-based obesity criterion. Receiver operating characteristic curves determined optimal cut points for each anthropometric measure, relative to DXA. The association of body fat and anthropometric obesity measures with disease status and cardiovascular risk was assessed in multiple regression analyses, controlling for age and glucocorticoid use. All analyses were performed separately for men and women. RESULTS: A total of 20%, 32%, and 44% of women and 41%, 36%, and 80% of men were classified as obese by BMI, WC, and DXA, respectively. Cut points were identified for anthropometric measures to better approximate DXA estimates of percent body fat (BMI ≥26.1 kg/m(2) for women and ≥24.7 kg/m(2) for men; WC ≥83 cm for women and ≥96 cm for men). For women and men, higher percent fat was associated with poorer RA status. Anthropometric measures were more closely linked to RA status for women, but identified cardiovascular risk for both women and men. CONCLUSION: A large percentage of this RA sample was overfat; DXA-defined obesity was twice as common in men as in women. Utility of revised BMI and WC cut points compared to traditional cut points remains to be examined in prospective studies, but results suggest that lower, sex-specific cut points may be warranted to better identify individuals at risk for poor RA and/or cardiovascular outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of obesity and how accurately standard anthropometric measures identify obesity among men and women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was performed for 141 persons with RA (56 men and 85 women). Two anthropometric proxies of obesity (body mass index [BMI] and waist circumference [WC]) were compared to a DXA-based obesity criterion. Receiver operating characteristic curves determined optimal cut points for each anthropometric measure, relative to DXA. The association of body fat and anthropometric obesity measures with disease status and cardiovascular risk was assessed in multiple regression analyses, controlling for age and glucocorticoid use. All analyses were performed separately for men and women. RESULTS: A total of 20%, 32%, and 44% of women and 41%, 36%, and 80% of men were classified as obese by BMI, WC, and DXA, respectively. Cut points were identified for anthropometric measures to better approximate DXA estimates of percent body fat (BMI ≥26.1 kg/m(2) for women and ≥24.7 kg/m(2) for men; WC ≥83 cm for women and ≥96 cm for men). For women and men, higher percent fat was associated with poorer RA status. Anthropometric measures were more closely linked to RA status for women, but identified cardiovascular risk for both women and men. CONCLUSION: A large percentage of this RA sample was overfat; DXA-defined obesity was twice as common in men as in women. Utility of revised BMI and WC cut points compared to traditional cut points remains to be examined in prospective studies, but results suggest that lower, sex-specific cut points may be warranted to better identify individuals at risk for poor RA and/or cardiovascular outcomes.
Authors: Lori G Borrud; Katherine M Flegal; Anne C Looker; James E Everhart; Tamara B Harris; John A Shepherd Journal: Vital Health Stat 11 Date: 2010-04
Authors: Antonios Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou; Giorgos S Metsios; Yiannis Koutedakis; George D Kitas Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2010-10-19 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Francisca Lago; Rodolfo Gómez; Javier Conde; Morena Scotece; Juan Jesus Gómez-Reino; Oreste Gualillo Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Annemarie Koster; Sari Stenholm; Dawn E Alley; Lauren J Kim; Eleanor M Simonsick; Alka M Kanaya; Marjolein Visser; Denise K Houston; Barbara J Nicklas; Frances A Tylavsky; Suzanne Satterfield; Bret H Goodpaster; Luigi Ferrucci; Tamara B Harris Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2010-04-15 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Jon T Giles; Matthew Allison; Roger S Blumenthal; Wendy Post; Allan C Gelber; Michelle Petri; Russell Tracy; Moyses Szklo; Joan M Bathon Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2010-11
Authors: Patricia Katz; Steven Gregorich; Jinoos Yazdany; Laura Trupin; Laura Julian; Edward Yelin; Lindsey A Criswell Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Joshua F Baker; Jon T Giles; David Weber; Mary B Leonard; Babette S Zemel; Jin Long; Said Ibrahim; Patricia P Katz Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Maria Fernanda Brandão de Resende Guimarães; Marcus Vinícius Melo de Andrade; Carla Jorge Machado; Érica Leandro Marciano Vieira; Maria Raquel da Costa Pinto; Antônio Lúcio Teixeira Júnior; Adriana Maria Kakehasi Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2018-06-11 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: James S Andrews; Laura Trupin; Gabriela Schmajuk; Jennifer Barton; Mary Margaretten; Jinoos Yazdany; Edward H Yelin; Patricia P Katz Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Joshua F Baker; Jin Long; Said Ibrahim; Mary B Leonard; Patricia Katz Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: James S Andrews; Laura Trupin; Edward H Yelin; Catherine L Hough; Kenneth E Covinsky; Patricia P Katz Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2017-01-23 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Katherine D Wysham; Dolores M Shoback; John B Imboden; Patricia P Katz Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2018-05-09 Impact factor: 4.794