Mahbubur Rahman1, Abbey B Berenson. 1. From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Women's Health, Galveston, Texas.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the National Institutes of Health's (NIH) body mass index (BMI)-based classification to identify obesity in comparison with the World Health Organization (WHO), which uses percent body fat, among white, black, and Hispanic reproductive-aged women. METHODS: Body weight, height, BMI, and percent body fat (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry generated) were determined for 555 healthy adult women aged 20-33 years (mean+/-standard deviation 26.5+/-4.0 years). Diagnostic accuracy of the NIH-based obesity definition (BMI of 30 kg/m or higher) was determined using the WHO criterion standard (percent body fat greater than 35%). RESULTS: Obesity as defined by the NIH (BMI 30 kg/m or higher) and by WHO (percent body fat greater than 35%) classified 205 (36.9%) and 350 (63.1%) of the women as obese, respectively. The NIH-defined obesity cutoff values had 47.8%, 75.0%, and 53.9% sensitivity in white, black and Hispanic, women, respectively. White and Hispanic women had 2.9% greater percent body fat than black women for a given BMI. Receiver operating characteristics curves analyses showed that the respective sensitivities improved to 85.6%, 81.3%, and 83.2%, and that 311 women (56.0%) were classified as obese as a whole when race or ethnic-specific BMI cutoff values driven by our data (BMI at or above 25.5, 28.7, and 26.2 kg/m for white, black, and Hispanic women, respectively) were used to detect percent body fat-defined obesity. CONCLUSION: Current BMI cutoff values recommended by the NIH failed to identify nearly half of reproductive-aged women who met the criteria for obesity by percent body fat. Using race or ethnic-specific BMI cutoff values would more accurately identify obesity in this population than the existing classification system.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the National Institutes of Health's (NIH) body mass index (BMI)-based classification to identify obesity in comparison with the World Health Organization (WHO), which uses percent body fat, among white, black, and Hispanic reproductive-aged women. METHODS: Body weight, height, BMI, and percent body fat (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry generated) were determined for 555 healthy adult women aged 20-33 years (mean+/-standard deviation 26.5+/-4.0 years). Diagnostic accuracy of the NIH-based obesity definition (BMI of 30 kg/m or higher) was determined using the WHO criterion standard (percent body fat greater than 35%). RESULTS:Obesity as defined by the NIH (BMI 30 kg/m or higher) and by WHO (percent body fat greater than 35%) classified 205 (36.9%) and 350 (63.1%) of the women as obese, respectively. The NIH-defined obesity cutoff values had 47.8%, 75.0%, and 53.9% sensitivity in white, black and Hispanic, women, respectively. White and Hispanic women had 2.9% greater percent body fat than black women for a given BMI. Receiver operating characteristics curves analyses showed that the respective sensitivities improved to 85.6%, 81.3%, and 83.2%, and that 311 women (56.0%) were classified as obese as a whole when race or ethnic-specific BMI cutoff values driven by our data (BMI at or above 25.5, 28.7, and 26.2 kg/m for white, black, and Hispanic women, respectively) were used to detect percent body fat-defined obesity. CONCLUSION: Current BMI cutoff values recommended by the NIH failed to identify nearly half of reproductive-aged women who met the criteria for obesity by percent body fat. Using race or ethnic-specific BMI cutoff values would more accurately identify obesity in this population than the existing classification system.
Authors: Fahad Razak; Sonia S Anand; Harry Shannon; Vladimir Vuksan; Bonnie Davis; Ruby Jacobs; Koon K Teo; Matthew McQueen; Salim Yusuf Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-04-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: José R Fernández; Moonseong Heo; Steven B Heymsfield; Richard N Pierson; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Zimian M Wang; Jack Wang; Matthew Hayes; David B Allison; Dympna Gallagher Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Robert M Blew; Luis B Sardinha; Laura A Milliken; Pedro J Teixeira; Scott B Going; Dawna L Ferreira; Margaret M Harris; Linda B Houtkooper; Timothy G Lohman Journal: Obes Res Date: 2002-08
Authors: Diana L Alba; Jeffrey A Farooq; Matthew Y C Lin; Anne L Schafer; John Shepherd; Suneil K Koliwad Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Richard N Bergman; Darko Stefanovski; Thomas A Buchanan; Anne E Sumner; James C Reynolds; Nancy G Sebring; Anny H Xiang; Richard M Watanabe Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2011-03-03 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Patricia P Katz; Jinoos Yazdany; Laura Trupin; Gabriela Schmajuk; Mary Margaretten; Jennifer Barton; Lindsey A Criswell; Edward H Yelin Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 4.794