Literature DB >> 22833263

Integration of transanal specimen extraction into laparoscopic anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a consecutive series of 179 patients.

Morris E Franklin1, Song Liang, Karla Russek.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This prospective study focused on patients with rectal cancer who underwent transanal specimen extraction after laparoscopic anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and specifically aims to investigate whether the transanal approach can be accepted as a safe and effective method for extracting the malignant specimen from the peritoneal cavity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospectively designed database of a consecutive series of patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal malignancy with various tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classifications from April 1991 to May 2011 at the Texas Endosurgery Institute was analyzed. Patient selection for transanal specimen extraction and intracorporeal anastomosis was made on the basis of size of the pathology and distance of rectal lesions from the anal verge.
RESULTS: 179 anterior resections were completed laparoscopically with intracorporeal anastomosis and transanal specimen extraction. The operating time for the entire procedures including resection, anastomosis, and specimen extraction was 170.9 ± 51.2 min, blood loss during the procedures was 86.4 ± 37.7 ml, and distance of the lower edge of the lesion from the anal verge was measured to be 11.3 ± 7.3 cm. Postoperatively, three patients developed anastomotic leakage with a leak rate of 1.7%, and the overall major complication rate after the procedures was 5.0%. Length of hospital stay was 6.9 ± 2.8 days. Two-year follow-up showed development of anal stenosis in three patients (2.0%) and erectile dysfunction in one patient (0.36%) after surgery. Finally, 9 out of 179 patients who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection with transanal specimen extraction were confirmed to have cancer recurrence, with 2-year local recurrence rate of 5.0%.
CONCLUSIONS: Transanal specimen extraction in laparoscopic rectal cancer resection is a safe and effective approach with comparable local cancer recurrence rate and postoperative complication rates, suggesting it can be integrated into laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22833263     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2440-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  29 in total

1.  Laparoscopic low anterior resection using a triple stapling technique.

Authors:  H Idani; M Narusue; H Kin; K Uda; M Muro; A Kaneko; H Sasaki; K Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.719

2.  Laparoscopic-assisted sigmoidectomy with transanal specimen extraction: a bridge to NOTES?

Authors:  J Knol; M D'Hondt; E J Dozois; J Vanden Boer; P Malisse
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Hybrid surgery: combined laparoscopy and natural orifice surgery.

Authors:  Jonathan P Pearl; Jeffrey M Marks; Jeffrey L Ponsky
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2008-04

4.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: long-term oncologic results.

Authors:  Christophe Laurent; Fabien Leblanc; Philippe Wütrich; Mathieu Scheffler; Eric Rullier
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Should completely intracorporeal anastomosis be considered in obese patients who undergo laparoscopic colectomy for benign or malignant disease of the colon?

Authors:  Ioannis Raftopoulos; Anita P Courcoulas; David Blumberg
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 6.  Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  S Breukink; J Pierie; T Wiggers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

7.  Laparoscopic colonic procedures.

Authors:  M E Franklin; R Ramos; D Rosenthal; W Schuessler
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Laparoscopic and open anterior resection for upper and mid rectal cancer: an evaluation of outcomes.

Authors:  Wai Lun Law; Yee Man Lee; Hok Kwok Choi; Chi Leung Seto; Judy W C Ho
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Long-term study of port-site incisional hernia after laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Abdulzahra Hussain; Hind Mahmood; Tarun Singhal; Santosh Balakrishnan; Jackie Nicholls; Shamsi El-Hasani
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  21 in total

1.  Laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bin Ma; Xuan-Zhang Huang; Peng Gao; Jun-Hua Zhao; Yong-Xi Song; Jing-Xu Sun; Xiao-Wan Chen; Zhen-Ning Wang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Shifting Paradigms in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Applications of Transanal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Grace Clara Lee; Patricia Sylla
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

3.  Current evidence in gastrointestinal surgery: natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  New trends in colorectal surgery: single port and natural orifice techniques.

Authors:  Ronald Daher; Elie Chouillard; Yves Panis
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Meta-analysis of natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jiajing Lin; Suyong Lin; Zhihua Chen; Bingqiu Zheng; Yilin Lin; Yan Zheng; Yisu Liu; Shao Qin Chen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  A case of local recurrence following transanal total mesorectal excision: a new form of port-site metastasis?

Authors:  S K Perdawood
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 7.  Evolution of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision.

Authors:  Heather Carmichael; Patricia Sylla
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2020-04-28

8.  Short-term outcomes after transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  A O Rasulov; Z Z Mamedli; S S Gordeyev; N A Kozlov; H E Dzhumabaev
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 9.  Improving outcomes and cost-effectiveness of colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Scott R Steele; Joshua Bleier; Brad Champagne; Imran Hassan; Andrew Russ; Anthony J Senagore; Patricia Sylla; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Comparison of early experience of robotic and transanal total mesorectal excision using propensity score matching.

Authors:  Wai Lun Law; Dominic C C Foo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.