PURPOSE OF REVIEW: HIV co-receptor tropism testing is recommended before therapy when the C-C chemokine receptor type 5 antagonist maraviroc is initiated. This review addresses the use of population genotypic tropism testing in relation to clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: Genotypic tropism tests predict viral co-receptor tropism based on the sequence of the V3 loop of the viral envelope. HIV occurs in a swarm of variants in the patient's body, called quasispecies. As next-generation sequencing techniques are not generally accessible to date, triplicate testing is often performed to improve sensitivity of population-based approaches, but no prospective studies assessing the performance of single and triplicate procedures related to clinical outcome have been performed yet. For interpretation of the genotype several web-based algorithms have been developed. Varying the cut-off of the commonly used geno2pheno[co-receptor] algorithm changes the sensitivity and specificity of the tropism prediction. In retrospective analyses of clinical studies and cohorts genotypic population tropism testing demonstrated equal correlation with clinical outcome on maraviroc compared with phenotypic assays.In patients with suppressed viraemia, proviral DNA testing is a well tolerated alternative to HIV-RNA testing. SUMMARY: Population genotypic methods have greater accessibility, lower cost, and faster turnaround time than other methods. Despite limited sensitivity for minority variants HIV genotypic population tropism testing showed good correlation with clinical outcome.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: HIV co-receptor tropism testing is recommended before therapy when the C-C chemokine receptor type 5 antagonist maraviroc is initiated. This review addresses the use of population genotypic tropism testing in relation to clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: Genotypic tropism tests predict viral co-receptor tropism based on the sequence of the V3 loop of the viral envelope. HIV occurs in a swarm of variants in the patient's body, called quasispecies. As next-generation sequencing techniques are not generally accessible to date, triplicate testing is often performed to improve sensitivity of population-based approaches, but no prospective studies assessing the performance of single and triplicate procedures related to clinical outcome have been performed yet. For interpretation of the genotype several web-based algorithms have been developed. Varying the cut-off of the commonly used geno2pheno[co-receptor] algorithm changes the sensitivity and specificity of the tropism prediction. In retrospective analyses of clinical studies and cohorts genotypic population tropism testing demonstrated equal correlation with clinical outcome on maraviroc compared with phenotypic assays.In patients with suppressed viraemia, proviral DNA testing is a well tolerated alternative to HIV-RNA testing. SUMMARY: Population genotypic methods have greater accessibility, lower cost, and faster turnaround time than other methods. Despite limited sensitivity for minority variants HIV genotypic population tropism testing showed good correlation with clinical outcome.
Authors: Julia Dina; Stephanie Raymond; Anne Maillard; Helene Le Guillou-Guillemette; Audrey Rodalec; Agnes Beby-Defaux; Genevieve Giraudeau; Sophie Vallet; Thomas Mourez; Christopher Payan; Astrid Vabret; Annick Ruffault; Virginie Ferre; Jacques Izopet; Jean-Christophe Plantier Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2013-06-26 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Iris Chen; Wei Huang; Matthew B Connor; Arne Frantzell; Vanessa Cummings; Geetha G Beauchamp; Sam Griffith; Sheldon D Fields; Hyman M Scott; Steven Shoptaw; Carlos Del Rio; Manya Magnus; Sharon Mannheimer; Hong-Van Tieu; Darrell P Wheeler; Kenneth H Mayer; Beryl A Koblin; Susan H Eshleman Journal: HIV Clin Trials Date: 2016-06-14
Authors: Jan Weber; Ana C Vazquez; Dane Winner; Richard M Gibson; Ariel M Rhea; Justine D Rose; Doug Wylie; Kenneth Henry; Alison Wright; Kevin King; John Archer; Eva Poveda; Vicente Soriano; David L Robertson; Paul D Olivo; Eric J Arts; Miguel E Quiñones-Mateu Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Luke C Swenson; Celia K S Chui; Chanson J Brumme; Dennison Chan; Conan K Woods; Theresa Mo; Winnie Dong; Doug Chapman; Marilyn Lewis; James F Demarest; Ian James; Simon Portsmouth; James Goodrich; Jayvant Heera; Hernan Valdez; P Richard Harrigan Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2013-09-30 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Sarah Lilian Pett; Janaki Amin; Andrejz Horban; Jaime Andrade-Villanueva; Marcelo Losso; Norma Porteiro; Juan Sierra Madero; Waldo Belloso; Elise Tu; David Silk; Anthony Kelleher; Richard Harrigan; Andrew Clark; Wataru Sugiura; Marcelo Wolff; John Gill; Jose Gatell; Martin Fisher; Amanda Clarke; Kiat Ruxrungtham; Thierry Prazuck; Rolf Kaiser; Ian Woolley; Juan Alberto Arnaiz; David Cooper; Jürgen K Rockstroh; Patrick Mallon; Sean Emery Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2016-04-05 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Saleta Sierra; J Nikolai Dybowski; Alejandro Pironti; Dominik Heider; Lisa Güney; Alex Thielen; Stefan Reuter; Stefan Esser; Gerd Fätkenheuer; Thomas Lengauer; Daniel Hoffmann; Herbert Pfister; Björn Jensen; Rolf Kaiser Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Richard M Gibson; Ashley M Meyer; Dane Winner; John Archer; Felix Feyertag; Ezequiel Ruiz-Mateos; Manuel Leal; David L Robertson; Christine L Schmotzer; Miguel E Quiñones-Mateu Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-01-27 Impact factor: 5.191