B Tang1, B Dean, E A Thomas. 1. Department of Molecular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Abstract
Increasing evidence suggests that epigenetic factors have critical roles in gene regulation in neuropsychiatric disorders and in aging, both of which are typically associated with a wide range of gene expression abnormalities. Here, we have used chromatin immunoprecipitation-qPCR to measure levels of acetylated histone H3 at lysines 9/14 (ac-H3K9K14), two epigenetic marks associated with transcriptionally active chromatin, at the promoter regions of eight schizophrenia-related genes in n=82 postmortem prefrontal cortical samples from normal subjects and those with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. We find that promoter-associated ac-H3K9K14 levels are correlated with gene expression levels, as measured by real-time qPCR for several genes, including, glutamic acid decarboxylase 1 (GAD1), 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2C (HTR2C), translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 70 homolog A (TOMM70A) and protein phosphatase 1E (PPM1E). Ac-H3K9K14 levels of several of the genes tested were significantly negatively associated with age in normal subjects and those with bipolar disorder, but not in subjects with schizophrenia, whereby low levels of histone acetylation were observed in early age and throughout aging. Consistent with this observation, significant hypoacetylation of H3K9K14 was detected in young subjects with schizophrenia when compared with age-matched controls. Our results demonstrate that gene expression changes associated with psychiatric disease and aging result from epigenetic mechanisms involving histone acetylation. We further find that treatment with a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor alters the expression of several candidate genes for schizophrenia in mouse brain. These findings may have therapeutic implications for the clinical use of HDAC inhibitors in psychiatric disorders.
Increasing evidence suggests that epigenetic factors have critical roles in gene regulation in neuropsychiatric disorders and in aging, both of which are typically associated with a wide range of gene expression abnormalities. Here, we have used chromatin immunoprecipitation-qPCR to measure levels of acetylated histone H3 at lysines 9/14 (ac-H3K9K14), two epigenetic marks associated with transcriptionally active chromatin, at the promoter regions of eight schizophrenia-related genes in n=82 postmortem prefrontal cortical samples from normal subjects and those with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. We find that promoter-associated ac-H3K9K14 levels are correlated with gene expression levels, as measured by real-time qPCR for several genes, including, glutamic acid decarboxylase 1 (GAD1), 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2C (HTR2C), translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 70 homolog A (TOMM70A) and protein phosphatase 1E (PPM1E). Ac-H3K9K14 levels of several of the genes tested were significantly negatively associated with age in normal subjects and those with bipolar disorder, but not in subjects with schizophrenia, whereby low levels of histone acetylation were observed in early age and throughout aging. Consistent with this observation, significant hypoacetylation of H3K9K14 was detected in young subjects with schizophrenia when compared with age-matched controls. Our results demonstrate that gene expression changes associated with psychiatric disease and aging result from epigenetic mechanisms involving histone acetylation. We further find that treatment with a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor alters the expression of several candidate genes for schizophrenia in mouse brain. These findings may have therapeutic implications for the clinical use of HDAC inhibitors in psychiatric disorders.
Epigenetic mechanisms of gene regulation involve both DNA methylation and
posttranslational modifications of histone proteins.[1] Although it is known that DNA methylation of cytosine
residues at CpG dinucleotide sites results in gene silencing, the effects of
posttranslational modifications on histone proteins are more
complex.[2] Histone tails are
subjected to many kinds of chemical modifications, such as methylation,
acetylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination and ribosylation,[3] which can lead to diverse effects on
chromatin structure and gene activity. For example, acetylation of lysine
residues usually correlates with chromatin accessibility and transcriptional
activation, whereby lysine methylation has either activating or repressive
effects on gene regulation.[3]During the last several years, there has been an increased interest in the
epigenetic origins of psychiatric diseases.[4,
5, 6,
7] Of the diverse epigenetic
machinery associated with gene regulation, DNA methylation has been the most
widely studied in the context of psychiatric disorders. Altered methylation
status of CpG sites has been found within the regulatory regions of several
candidate genes in subjects with schizophrenia, including
HTR1A,[8]
HTR2A,[9] glutamic acid
decarboxylase 1 (GAD1),[10, 11]
REELIN,[12, 13]
COMT,[14]
DRD2[15] and
SOX10.[16] More
recently, epigenome-wide profiling has revealed large scale changes in
DNA-methylation associated with major psychosis, some of which involve genes
associated with neuronal development as well as genes involved with
glutamatergic and GABAergic neurotransmission.[17]To date, much less is known about alterations in histone modifications in
schizophrenia. Previous studies have quantified global levels of histone
phosphorylation, acetylation and methylation, at different lysine (K), serine
(S) and arginine (R) residues of histones H3 and H4. Overall, no significant
differences in the levels of these histone marks were found in the prefrontal
cortex of individuals with schizophrenia compared with normal control
subjects;[18] however, higher
methylation levels of histone H3 at R17 were detected within a subset of
affected patients.[18] More recently,
decreases in trimethylated H3 at K4 were found specifically at the GAD1
locus in the prefrontal cortex of patients with schizophrenia compared with
control subjects, in correlation with reduced GAD1 mRNA levels.[11] These data suggest that changes in
histone modifications at specific genomic loci, rather than on a global scale,
may be occurring in schizophrenia, and identification of such loci may unveil
the role of epigenetic regulation of gene expression in schizophrenia.Given the widespread changes in gene expression that have been associated with
psychiatric disorders,[19, 20] we investigated the contribution of
histone acetylation at specific gene promoters to gene expression regulation in
schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Previous studies have shown that acetylation
levels of histone H3 at K9 (ac-H3K9) and at K14 (ac-H3K14) are highest at the
predicted transcriptional start sites of active genes and are positively
correlated with one another, as well as with transcriptional activity across a
range of yeast genes.[21] Therefore, we
measured histone acetylation at K9 and K14 at the proximal promoter regions of
eight selected genes representing diverse functionalities that have been
implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.We find that histone acetylation at K9 and K14 is associated with gene expression
levels for eight schizophrenia-related genes, and that histone acetylation
patterns at specific loci show distinct disease and age-related effects in
normal subjects and those with schizophrenia and/or bipolar disorder.
Importantly, understanding the role of histone acetylation in schizophrenia and
bipolar disorder may have relevant therapeutic implications, whereby the use of
histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors may be clinically beneficial by means of
restoring abnormal histone acetylation patterns and accompanying gene expression
deficits in schizophrenia and with aging in normal subjects.
Materials and methods
Samples
This study utilizes postmortem human brain samples (n=82 in
total) from two different brain banks: The Harvard Brain Tissue Resource
Center (HBT) and the Victorian Brain Bank Network (VBBN) at the Mental
Health Research Institute. For the VBBN samples, approval was obtained from
both the Ethics Committee of the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine
and the Mental Health Research and Ethics Committee of Melbourne Health.
Cases were split into two groups. The first group consists of brains from
the HBT collection: the prefrontal cortex (Brodmann area 10) from
n=50 subjects (n=18 normal subjects,
n=16 subjects with schizophrenia and
n=16 subjects with bipolar disorder). The second group
consisted of young subjects from the VBBN collection: the prefrontal cortex
(Brodmann area 46) from n=16 subjects (n=8
control, n=8 subjects with schizophrenia; 18–36 years
of age) and old subjects from the HBT collection: the prefrontal cortex
(Brodmann area 10) from n=16 subjects (n=8
control and n=8 subjects with schizophrenia; 55–92
years of age). Demographic data for individual subjects are shown in
Supplementary Table 1. Ascertainment and
diagnosis of all subjects were based on the diagnostic and statistical
manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV) criteria (American Psychiatric
Association 1994). In the case of the VBBN collection, an additional
validated instrument, the Diagnostic Instrument for Brain Studies, was
used.[22] None of the
subjects had a record of treatment with valproic acid, an HDAC inhibitor.
For the VBBN subjects, cadavers had been refrigerated within 5 h from
death to ensure slowing of any autolysis of the CNS tissue; the recorded
postmortem intervals (PMIs) include refrigeration times. For these samples,
tissue integrity was assessed by pH, which is now recognized as a better
measure of tissue preservation than PMI,[23] and all samples with pH<6.1 were excluded.
For all samples, RNA quality was assessed by Bioanalyzer tracings or gel
electrophoresis and spectrophotometric measurements, which showed no
evidence for degradation products or protein contamination.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation
Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-PCR was performed on postmortem human
brain samples using an adaptation of a method previously described in
detail.[24] Briefly,
∼60–100 mg of the prefrontal cortex from human postmortem
brain was fixed with 1% of formaldehyde for 15 min at room
temperature then homogenized to isolate nuclei. DNA was sonicated in lysis
buffer (1% SDS, 10 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1
× protease inhibitors cocktail (Roche, Germany)) to
∼0.2—0.8 kb in size of DNA fragments. 100 μl of
precleared nuclear lysate was diluted with dilution buffer (1% Triton
× 100, 2 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM
NaCl and 1 × protease inhibitors cocktail), and incubated with
3 μg of histone ac-H3K9K14 (Upstate, Billerica, MA, USA),
3 μg rabbit control IgG (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA,
USA) or total histone H3 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) antibodies overnight at
4 °C. 60 μl of Protein A Agarose beads (Millipore, CA,
USA) were added and incubated for 2 h to capture the immune
complexes. The protein–DNA complexes were washed and eluted in elution
buffer (1% SDS and 0.1 M NaHCO3) at
65 °C for 20 min. The proteins were digested by proteinase
K, and the cross-linking reaction was reversed at 65 °C
overnight. DNA was purified with phenol/chloroform and ethanol
precipitation, and analyzed by real-time PCR analysis.
Gene expression analysis
Real-time qPCR analysis was performed using the ABI PRISMs 7900HT Sequence
Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) on the recovered
DNA from the ChIP experiments using primers directed against the proximal
promoter regions of schizophrenia-related genes (Supplementary Table 2), or on cDNA prepared from the same
samples using the primers designed in the exonic regions of selected genes
(Supplementary Table 2) as described
previously.[25, 26] The proximal promoter region
(∼1 kb upstream from transcription start site) of each gene was
obtained from UCSC browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgGateway). Primers were
designed to generate amplicons of 80–150 nucleotides with similar
melting temperatures (64°C) using Invitrogen's Primer Designer and
their specificity for binding to the desired sequences was searched against
the NCBI database. We analyzed the ChIP-qPCR data using the Percent Input
Method (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Briefly, the amplification
efficiency (AE) of the qPCR reaction for each primer pair and sample was
determined by the input DNA using the formula AE=10^(-1/slope).
The threshold cycle (Ct) value of Input, which is 1% of the
immunoprecipitation (IP) reaction was adjusted to 100% by subtracting
6.644 cycles (log2 of 100), and then the percent input was calculated by the
formula 100 × AE∧(adjusted input Ct-IP Ct). For gene
expression, the amount of cDNA in each sample was calculated using SDS2.1
software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) by the comparative Ct
method and expressed as 2exp (Ct) using beta-2-microglobulin (B2M)
as an internal control.Differences in the levels of microarray expression values, from our
previously published microarray dataset,[27] were calculated by ANOVA, performed using the
National Institutes of Aging Array Tools,[28] with the FDR controlled at a default setting of
0.1, according to Benjamini and Hochberg.[29]
Statistics
The demographic characteristics for each cohort were compared using
Student's t-tests to verify matching for age, sex ratio, PMIs
and tissue pH. The PMI between the two brain banks were significantly
different (46.13±2.43 vs 21.3±1.74 h;
P<0.0001) (Supplementary Table
1), which could be due, in part, to different criteria for
defining PMI (see above). Importantly, the PMIs did not show any significant
difference when compared by cohort. The gene expression and ChIP-qPCR data
values were analyzed for normal distribution using the
Kolmogorov–Smirnov method, which confirmed that the data were normally
distributed for all subjects. Given that the data were normally distributed,
each data set was interrogated for outliers using the Grubbs' test,
which resulted in the removal of ChIP-qPCR values from one of the old
control subjects from the HBT collection. For assessment of disease effects
of the qPCR and ChIP-qPCR data among the control, schizophrenia and bipolar
disorder cohorts, significant differences were determined by one-way ANOVA
and Student's unpaired t-tests (GraphPad 5.0; San Diego, CA,
USA). The effects of demographic and brain collection parameters (age, sex,
PMI and tissue pH) on the disease effect for all data were assessed by
ANCOVA (XLSTAT software, Addinsoft, New York, NY, USA). From this analysis,
age showed a significant contribution to data variation in gene expression
and/or ChIP data for all genes tested (Supplementary Table 3). Tissue pH showed a significant
effect on gene expression only for translocase of outer mitochondrial
membrane 70 homolog A (TOMM70A) in the schizophrenia comparison and
for GAD1 in the bipolar disorder comparison, but no significant
effects of pH on ChIP data were observed for any genes (Supplementary Table 3). Pearson's product moment
correlation analysis was further performed for the ac-H3K9K14 levels (as
percentage input) and the B2M-normalized expression values against
the age of the subjects, and for ac-H3K9K14 levels against the gene
expression values.
Results
Disease effects on gene expression
We selected eight diverse “schizophrenia-related” genes (Table 1) for this study based on the following
criteria: (1) genes showing differential expression in schizophrenia
and/or bipolar disorder from published microarray studies;[30, 31]
(2) genes showing CNS cell type-specific expression patterns based on
comparison with previous transcriptome studies performed on isolated
astrocytes, neurons and oligodendrocytes;[32] (3) genes representing different
functions/pathways related to schizophrenia based on review of the
literature.[20, 33, 34,
35] Additionally, these selected
genes are representative of different gene co-expression networks, based on
our previous studies, which identified over 20 gene co-expression modules in
the prefrontal cortex from subjects with schizophrenia and bipolar
disorder.[36] We first
tested for expression differences for five neuronally expressed genes,
GABAergic neurotransmission: GAD1; mitochondrial
function/import: TOMM70A; neurotransmitter receptor signaling:
serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 2C (HTR2C) and regulator of
G protein signaling 4 (RGS4); signal transduction: protein
phosphatase, Mg2+/Mn2+ dependent, 1E
(PPM1E) in the postmortem prefrontal cortex (Brodmann area 10)
from a cohort of subjects with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder from the
Harvard Tissue Resource Center (group 1; Supplementary
Table 1). Real-time qPCR analysis revealed decreased
expression of HTR2C, TOMM70A, RGS4 and PPM1E in subjects
with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder compared with matched controls, and
a decrease expression in GAD1 only in subjects with schizophrenia
(Figure 1).
Table 1
Summary of genes selected for this study
Gene ID
Gene description
Cell type associationa
Function
SCZb
SCZc
BPc
GAD1
Glutamic acid decarboxylase 1
Neuron
GABAergic neurotransmission
↓
↓
↓
HTR2C
5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) receptor 2C
Neuron
Neurotransmitter receptor signaling
↓
↑
↓
RGS4
Regulator of G-protein signaling 4
Neuron
↓
—
↓
TOMM70A
Translocase of outer mitochondrial membrane 70 homolog A
Neuron
Mitochondrial function/import
↓
↓
↓
PPM1E
Protein phosphatase,
Mg2+/Mn2+ dependent,
1E
Neuron
Signal transduction
↓
↓
↑
MBP
Myelin basic protein
Oligodendrocyte
Myelination-associated
↓
↓
↓
UGT8
UDP glycosyltransferase 8
Oligodendrocyte
White matter function
↓
↓
H1FNT
H1 histone family, member N
Ubiquitous
Chromatin-related
↓
NP
NP
The arrows designate the direction of the significant gene expression
change in schizophrenia (SCZ) or bipolar disorder (BP) from previous
microarray studies.
‘–' designates no significant change in expression;
NP, indicates not present in the dataset.
Cell-type specific expression was determined by comparing with
transcriptome datasets for astrocytes, neurons and oligodendrocytes,
from Cahoy et al.[32]
From Narayan et al.[30]
From the Stanley Medical Research Database,
>https://www.stanleygenomics.org/ and Kim and
Webster.[31]
Figure 1
Real-time PCR analysis for the indicated genes in subjects with
schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and non-psychiatric controls. Real-time qPCR
assays were performed as described in the materials and methods on
postmortem Brodmann area (BA) 10 from subjects with schizophrenia, bipolar
disorder and matched controls (group 1; n=50 total). Data
shown are gene expression values normalized by the housekeeping gene,
B2M. Asterisks denote significant differences in expression as
determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Student's t-test:
*P<0.05; +P<0.08;
**P<0.01;
***P<0.001.
Histone acetylation at gene promoters
To test for correlations between gene expression activity and promoter
histone acetylation, we performed ChIP-qPCR assays on cortical samples from
these same subjects, using an antibody directed against ac-H3K9K14, followed
by real-time qPCR analysis using primers directed against the proximal
promoter regions of these genes. Linear regression analysis revealed that
gene expression levels were correlated with promoter-associated ac-H3K9K14
levels for GAD1, TOMM70A, HTR2C and PP1ME, but not for
RGS4, in all 50 subjects (psychiatric cases and controls)
(Figure 2). Ac-H3K9K14 levels were also
compared among all psychiatric cases and controls, and no significant
differences were detected (data not shown).
Figure 2
Correlation between gene expression levels and acetylation of histone H3 at
K9 and K14. ChIP-qPCR assays were performed on postmortem BA10 from the same
subjects as in Figure 1, measuring ac-H3K9K14
levels at the promoter regions of the indicated genes (as designated by
UniGene IDs). Rabbit IgG was used as a negative control for the pull-down.
Histone acetylation is presented as percentage input DNA. Gene expression
levels were determined by real-time qPCR, from Figure
1. Each point represents one subject. Pink, control subjects;
blue, subjects with schizophrenia; black, subjects with bipolar disorder.
Pearson's correlation (r) values are indicated within each
graph.
Age effects on gene activity
ANCOVA of the demographic and sample variables with the experimental data
values revealed that age significantly contributed to the variation in gene
expression and/or ac-H3K9K14 levels among disease cohorts for all genes
tested. Therefore, we further highlighted the effects of age on ac-H3K9K14
levels by performing Pearson's linear correlation analyses. Promoter
associated ac-H3K9K14 levels were significantly negatively associated with
age for GAD1, RGS4, PPM1E, HTR2C and TOMM70A in normal
subjects (Table 2). Importantly, there was also
an effect of age on levels of gene expression in normal subjects for all
genes except HTR2C (Table 2). The same
effects of age on histone acetylation and gene expression levels were
observed for GAD1, TOMM70A and PPM1E in subjects with
bipolar disorder (Table 2); however, in marked
contrast, and with the exception of GAD1, there was no effect of
age on histone acetylation levels in the prefrontal cortex from subjects
with schizophrenia (Table 2).
Table 2
Correlation analysis (Pearsons's (r) values) of ChIP-qPCR and
gene expression data against age
ChIP-qPCR data
Gene Expression data:
Normal
Schizophrenia
Bipolar disorder
Normal
Schizophrenia
Bipolar disorder
Gene ID
Age, r-value
P-value
Age, r-value
P-value
Age, r-value
P-value
Age, r-value
P-value
Age, r-value
P-value
Age, r-value
P-value
RGS4
−0.658
0.020
−0.079
0.788
−0.241
0.406
−0.503
0.056
−0.307
0.285
−0.879
<0.0001
PPM1E
−0.731
0.007
0.306
0.288
−0.681
0.007
−0.579
0.023
−0.350
0.221
−0.809
0.001
GAD1-1
−0.557
0.048
−0.623
0.017
−0.789
0.001
−0.527
0.043
−0.460
0.098
−0.737
0.003
GAD1-2
−0.581
0.023
−0.167
0.550
ND
ND
−0.504
0.005
0.128
0.500
ND
ND
HTR2C-1
−0.602
0.023
−0.008
0.978
−0.448
0.108
−0.078
0.781
−0.252
0.385
−0.812
0.000
HTR2C-2
−0.429
0.111
−0.245
0.361
ND
ND
−0.499
0.006
0.244
0.194
ND
ND
TOMM70A-1
−0.756
0.002
−0.132
0.652
−0.604
0.022
−0.491
0.063
−0.384
0.175
−0.829
0.000
TOMM70A-2
−0.261
0.341
0.266
0.320
ND
ND
−0.529
0.003
0.271
0.148
ND
ND
MBP
−0.682
0.005
0.416
0.109
ND
ND
−0.505
0.005
0.590
0.001
ND
ND
UGT8
−0.376
0.166
0.138
0.610
ND
ND
0.153
0.428
0.527
0.003
ND
ND
H1FNT
−0.480
0.082
−0.300
0.260
ND
ND
−0.053
0.786
0.252
0.179
ND
ND
ND, not determined.
Bold font indicates a statistically significant correlation.
The values for GAD1-2, HTR2C-2, TOMM70A-2, MBP, UGT8 and H1FNT are
from subjects in group 2, with the gene expression data reflecting
the microarray correlations shown in Supplementary Figure 1.
Histone acetylation differences in young vs old subjects
To further explore the age effect on histone acetylation, we measured
ac-H3K9K14 levels at the promoter regions of three of the neuronal genes,
GAD1, TOMM70A and HTR2C, plus two
oligodendrocyte-expressing genes, myelin basic protein (MBP) and
UDP glycosyltransferase 8 (UGT8), and a ubiquitously-expressed
gene, H1 histone family, member N (H1FNT) in the postmortem
prefrontal cortex from a second cohort of subjects (group 2; Supplementary Table 1). This cohort was comprised
of young subjects (18–36 years of age) and old subjects
(55–92 years of age) with schizophrenia and age-matched
controls (n=32 in total). Consistent with the results from
subjects in group 1 above, Pearson's correlation analysis of ac-H3K9K14
levels against age revealed strong negative correlation with age in normal
subjects (Table 2; Figure
3), but not in subjects with schizophrenia, despite measuring
levels in a cohort of subjects with a greater age range (18–91 years).
Examining our previous microarray data generated from the prefrontal cortex
from case and control subjects ranging in age from 18–81 years
(GEO accession #GSE21138),[30,
37] which consisted of one-half
of the same young subjects as used in this study, we similarly find that the
expression levels of these genes decreases with age (Supplementary Figure 1).
Figure 3
Ac-H3K9K14 levels as a function of age in control subjects and those with
schizophrenia. ChIP-qPCR assays were performed on postmortem BA46 from
control subjects (closed circles, solid line) and those with schizophrenia
(open circles, dashed line) representing a wide age range (group 2;
n=32 subjects in total). Pearson's (r)
values are shown in Table 2.
From the linear plots shown in Figure 3, it is
apparent that for several genes, ac-H3K9K14 levels do not decrease with
advanced age because levels are low in subjects with schizophrenia at an
early age, and remain low throughout aging. Hence, we performed group-wise
comparisons of the ChIP-qPCR data according to age. This analysis revealed
hypoacetylation of H3K9K14, the promoter regions of GAD1, UGT8,
HTR2C and H1FNT in young subjects with schizophrenia
compared with matched controls (Figure 4A). In
contrast, only HTR2C showed a decrease in ac-H3K9K14 levels in old
subjects compared with matched controls, although this did not reach
significance (P=0.071) (Figure
4A). Interestingly, ac-H3K9K14 levels at the MBP promoter were
significantly increased in old subjects compared with matched controls
(Figure 4A).
Figure 4
Histone H3K9K14 is hypoacetylated at the promoter regions of genes in young
subjects with schizophrenia and associated with decreased gene expression
levels. (a) ChIP-qPCR assays were performed on young and old subjects
with schizophrenia and age-matched controls (group 2; n=32
subjects in total), measuring ac-H3K9K14 levels at the promoter regions of
the indicated genes (UniGene IDs). Asterisks denote significant differences
in ac-H3K9K14 levels, as determined by Student's t-test:
*, P<0.05, +,
P<0.08. (b) Significant differences in microarray
expression values were determined by ANOVA as described in Materials and
methods; *, P<0.05, **,
P<0.01.
Again, we examined whether the expression of these genes from our previous
microarray studies (GEO accession #GSE21138), which were performed on the prefrontal
cortex from one-half of the same young subjects,[30] was associated with ac-H3K9K14 levels. We also
examined gene expression from subjects at late stage, although they were
different than those used for ChIP-qPCR in the current study. Consistent
with the observed hypoacetylation of H3K9K14 in young subjects with
schizophrenia, we find that the expression of GAD1, TOMM70A, HTR2C, MBP,
UGT8 and H1FNT are decreased in young-aged subjects
compared with age-matched controls (Figure 4B).
Old-aged subjects with schizophrenia compared with their age-matched
controls showed no significant changes in expression of these genes,
consistent with the lack of difference in ac-H3K9K14 levels in older
subjects (Figure 4B).
HDAC inhibitors and schizophrenia candidate genes
The role of histone acetylation on gene regulation is especially pertinent
because of the therapeutic potential of HDAC inhibitors, which have gained
considerable attention as a relevant therapeutic option for many
neurological disorders[38, 39] including psychiatric
disorders.[5, 40] Our previous studies have focused on novel,
HDAC1/3-selective HDAC inhibitors, including HDACi
4b.[25, 41] To gain insight into the potential
usefulness of novel selective HDAC inhibitors, such as HDACi 4b, we
screened our previously published microarray data from HDACi
4b-treated mouse brain[25](GEO accession #GSE26317) for schizophrenia candidate genes as
determined from the SZGene database (www.szgene.org). We found that HDACi 4b
treatment altered the expression of several candidate genes for
schizophrenia; from the top 45 candidate genes listed on the SZGene
database, 17 genes, including RGS4 and MBP, two genes from
this study, were found to be altered in the mouse brain by 4b
(Figure 5). This is a significant
overrepresentation of 4b-regulated candidate genes than would be
expected by chance (Fisher's exact test; P=0.02). For
most of these genes, which have been shown to be decreased in expression in
schizophrenia, HDACi 4b caused an elevation of gene expression
(Figure 5).
Figure 5
Heatmap depiction of the 17 schizophrenia candidate genes found to be
significantly regulated by HDACi 4b treatment in the mouse brain.
Official UniGene symbols are shown for each gene. Each colored pixel
represents an individual gene expression value. Relative decreases in gene
expression are indicated by green and increases in expression by red.
Two-dimensional hierarchical clustering of the samples is shown along the
top.
Discussion
In this study, we measured gene expression and promoter-associated histone
ac-H3K9K14 levels in human postmortem cortex for eight genes representing
diverse functions associated with schizophrenia in order to assess the role of
epigenetic mechanisms on gene activity. In particular, we included assessment of
GAD1, which encodes the 67-kDa glutamate decarboxylase GABA
synthesis enzyme. Deficits in the expression of GAD1 are considered to
be among the most frequently replicated findings in schizophrenia postmortem
brain[42, 43](reviewed in ref. 44).
The major findings from this study are: (1) histone ac-H3K9K14 levels are
correlated with gene expression levels for several schizophrenia-related genes,
including GAD1; (2) age is strongly negatively associated with
promoter-associated histone acetylation levels in normal subjects and those with
bipolar disorder, but not schizophrenia and (3) histone H3K9K14 levels are
hypoacetylated at the promoter regions of important genes in young subjects with
schizophrenia.Epigenetic mechanisms of gene regulation involve both DNA methylation and an
array of posttranslational modifications of histone proteins.[1] Although DNA methylation has been more
widely studied in the context of psychiatric disorders, in this study we focused
on histone acetylation at two specific lysine residues, K9 and K14. We
demonstrated correlation of ac-H3K9K14 levels with expression levels of selected
genes in the postmortem human prefrontal cortex. These findings are consistent
with previous studies showing that acetylation of histone H3 at K9 and K14 are
positively correlated with one another and associated with transcriptional
activity across a majority of yeast genes.[21] Epigenetic studies in yeast have also found that ac-H3K9
and ac-H3K14 levels are correlated with levels of trimethylated H3K4 (H3K4me3),
another epigenetic mark associated with active gene transcription and abundant
at the transcription start sites of genes. Genome-wide maps of histone H3K4me3
have been previously identified in the human prefrontal cortex[45] and these data are freely available on
the UCSC web browser (http://genome.ucsc.edu). Again, consistent with the findings from
yeast, we found that the promoter loci bearing ac-H3K9K14 marks for GAD1,
RGS4, HTR2C, PPM1E and UGT8 also harbor H3K4me3 marks in the
human prefrontal cortex. An example of this overlap is shown for UGT8
in Supplementary Figure 2.The second major finding from this study is that age is strongly negatively
correlated with promoter-associated histone acetylation levels in normal
subjects. Normal aging is known to be accompanied by genomic instability and
changes in gene expression,[46] and
evidence now suggests that epigenetic factors are a major cause of these
age-related changes in mice and humans.[47,
48] Most epigenetic studies of the
aging brain have focused on DNA methylation where positive correlations between
DNA methylation and chronological age have been demonstrated for selected genes,
such as GAD1,[49] as well as
genome wide.[47, 48, 49] However,
information on how histone modifications change with age is more
limited.[50] Here, we have shown
that histone acetylation levels are negatively correlated with age at several
gene promoters, including GAD1, RGS4, HTR2C, PPM1E and
MBP and that the expression levels of these genes are similarly
negatively correlated with age. The gene expression data are consistent with a
previous study showing that the expression of several schizophrenia candidate
genes, including RGS4 and GAD1, decreases with age in the
postmortem prefrontal cortex from normal individuals.[51] We also found that promoter-associated histone
acetylation levels were significantly negatively correlated with age in subjects
with bipolar disorder, but not schizophrenia, indicating disease-specific
effects of epigenetic gene regulation. We further show that these effects are
not unique to cell type-specific gene promoters, as acetylation changes were
detected in both neuron- and glia-expressed genes.The mechanism of the reduced site-specific acetylation with age is unclear;
however, a few possibilities could be considered. Altered acetylation levels of
histones could occur by changes in the activities of HDAC enzymes. For example,
a decrease in HDAC activity has been observed in normal rat liver with
increasing age.[52] Another possibility
is that acetylated histones are replaced by newly synthesized unmodified ones.
Although it has been shown that histone turnover in the brain is
slow,[53] it could be
potentially substantial with aging. It is also possible that some histone
modifications decay with time at the promoters of genes that are not active in
aged individuals. The lack of an age effect on histone acetylation observed in
the brains of subjects with schizophrenia could be due to abnormalities in any
of the above-mentioned mechanisms.Thirdly, we demonstrated that histone H3 is hypoacetylated in young subjects with
schizophrenia when compared with age-matched controls. Such hypoacetylation of
histone proteins could be reversed by the actions of HDAC inhibitors, thereby
improving the associated gene expression deficits. To date, 18 humanHDAC
subtypes have been identified, which can be divided into four main groups,
classes I–IV.[38] Valproic acid,
an inhibitor of class I HDACs,[54] has a
long and established history of efficacy in the treatment of bipolar disorder.
Reports have further shown that typical and atypical antipsychotics are more
potent, more efficacious and less toxic if they are co-administered with
valproic acid,[55, 56, 57] although, some
studies did not report such benefit.[58,
59, 60] Nonetheless, the beneficial effects of valproic acid
that were observed in schizophrenia suggest that more potent and/or more
selective HDAC inhibitors may represent a new opportunity for pharmacological
interventions for this disorder. Consistent with this view, previous studies
have shown that another class I HDAC inhibitor, MS-275, potently activates
GAD1 gene expression in NT2 cells accompanied by decreased
GAD1 promoter methylation,[10] and in the current study, we have shown that HDACi
4b altered the levels of 17 schizophrenia candidate genes in the
mouse brain (see Figure 5). Consistent with these
findings, previous studies have demonstrated that inhibition of the class I
HDACs, HDAC2 and HDAC3, enhances cognition and memory function in
rodents.[61, 62]One final note is that the similarity between histone hypoacetylation observed
with normal aging and in young subjects with schizophrenia is consistent with
emerging data showing phenotypic overlap between normal aging and early-stage
schizophrenia. Normal aging has been linked to alterations in white matter
density and volume, gray matter volume decline, cognitive dysfunction, shortened
telomeres, microglia activation and psychotic symptoms,[63, 64, 65, 66] which also
characterize schizophrenia at first episode or recent onset.[67, 68, 69, 70, 71] Furthermore, our own previous studies
have demonstrated that normal human aging and early-stage schizophrenia share
common molecular phenotypes.[37]In summary, our data demonstrate that gene expression changes associated with
psychiatric disease and aging result from epigenetic mechanisms of gene
regulation involving histone acetylation. These findings provide a relevant
basis for the use of HDAC inhibitors as therapeutic treatment for schizophrenia,
particularly in young subjects (that is, <36 years of age), whereby
the use of HDAC inhibitors may be therapeutically beneficial by means of
restoring abnormal histone acetylation patterns and accompanying gene expression
deficits in schizophrenia leading to improved clinical symptoms. Similarly, HDAC
inhibitors may also be useful for treatment of age-related phenotypes, such as
psychosis and cognitive decline, which are similar to those typically observed
in subjects with schizophrenia.
Authors: Stephen I Deutsch; Richard B Rosse; John Mastropaolo; Katrice D Long; Brooke L Gaskins Journal: Clin Neuropharmacol Date: 2008 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.592
Authors: S Akbarian; M M Huntsman; J J Kim; A Tafazzoli; S G Potkin; W E Bunney; E G Jones Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 1995 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Arturas Petronis; Irving I Gottesman; Peixiang Kan; James L Kennedy; Vincenzo S Basile; Andrew D Paterson; Violeta Popendikyte Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2003 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Ji-Song Guan; Stephen J Haggarty; Emanuela Giacometti; Jan-Hermen Dannenberg; Nadine Joseph; Jun Gao; Thomas J F Nieland; Ying Zhou; Xinyu Wang; Ralph Mazitschek; James E Bradner; Ronald A DePinho; Rudolf Jaenisch; Li-Huei Tsai Journal: Nature Date: 2009-05-07 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Tonya M Gilbert; Nicole R Zürcher; Christine J Wu; Anisha Bhanot; Baileigh G Hightower; Minhae Kim; Daniel S Albrecht; Hsiao-Ying Wey; Frederick A Schroeder; Anais Rodriguez-Thompson; Thomas M Morin; Kamber L Hart; Amelia M Pellegrini; Misha M Riley; Changning Wang; Steven M Stufflebeam; Stephen J Haggarty; Daphne J Holt; Marco L Loggia; Roy H Perlis; Hannah E Brown; Joshua L Roffman; Jacob M Hooker Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2018-12-10 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Janitza L Montalvo-Ortiz; Daniel W Fisher; Guadalupe Rodríguez; Deyu Fang; John G Csernansky; Hongxin Dong Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2017-04-18 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Leonidas Chouliaras; Daniel L A van den Hove; Gunter Kenis; Michael van Draanen; Patrick R Hof; Jim van Os; Harry W M Steinbusch; Christoph Schmitz; Bart P F Rutten Journal: Curr Alzheimer Res Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Janitza L Montalvo-Ortiz; Jack Keegan; Christopher Gallardo; Nicolas Gerst; Kazuhiro Tetsuka; Chris Tucker; Mitsuyuki Matsumoto; Deyu Fang; John G Csernansky; Hongxin Dong Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2013-12-24 Impact factor: 7.853