Literature DB >> 22831822

Comparison of the sensitivity of a pre-MRI questionnaire and point of care eGFR testing for detection of impaired renal function.

Philip Chang1, Elise Saddleton, Anne E Laumann, Brenda Schmitz, Dennis P West, Steven M Belknap, Sudharshan Parthasarathy, Beatrice J Edwards, June M McKoy, Frank H Miller.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: The Food and Drug Administration recommends renal function estimation using laboratory testing for patients at risk for chronically reduced kidney function before the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs). Point-of-care (POC) estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) testing was added to the pre-magnetic resonance (MR) questionnaire at our institution in June 2008 for all patients undergoing a contrast-enhanced MR exam. This study was done to evaluate the effectiveness of a pre-MR screening questionnaire about kidney disease and to assess POC eGFR detection of additional patients at risk for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by our institutional review board and determined to be Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant. Medical records, laboratory data, and pre-MR questionnaires of all patients who presented for contrast-enhanced MR scans during October 2008 were reviewed. The National Kidney Disease Education Program isotope-dilution mass spectrometry-traceable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation was used to calculate eGFRs using the POC creatinine laboratory value, age, race, and gender. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using 2 × 2 tables, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated with exact binomial confidence intervals.
RESULTS: A total of 1167 individuals presented for contrast-enhanced MR scans. Of 13 individuals on dialysis, 2 did not report renal disease. Of 1154 individuals not on dialysis, 25 had an eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (95% CI 1.41%-3.18%). Of these 25, 13 did and 12 did not report renal disease. The sensitivity of the questionnaire for identifying patients with an eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) was 63.2%. POC eGFR estimations identified a prevalence of 2.17% (95% CI: 1.41%-3.18%) of the total individuals not on dialysis, with an eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Patients who denied kidney dysfunction had a 1.08% (95% CI: 0.56%-1.88%) posttest probability of having an eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2).
CONCLUSIONS: POC eGFR testing identified a significant number of individuals with renal dysfunction not found by the pre-MR imaging questionnaire alone.
Copyright © 2012 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22831822      PMCID: PMC3600374          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  18 in total

Review 1.  Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy: the first 6 years.

Authors:  Shawn E Cowper
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  Using serum creatinine to estimate glomerular filtration rate: accuracy in good health and in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Andrew D Rule; Timothy S Larson; Erik J Bergstralh; Jeff M Slezak; Steven J Jacobsen; Fernando G Cosio
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Gadolinium--a specific trigger for the development of nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis?

Authors:  Thomas Grobner
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 5.992

4.  Impact on hospital policy: Yale experience.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Weinreb
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Gadodiamide-associated nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: why radiologists should be concerned.

Authors:  Dale R Broome; Mark S Girguis; Pedro W Baron; Alfred C Cottrell; Ingrid Kjellin; Gerald A Kirk
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Evaluation of rapid point-of-care creatinine testing in the radiology service of a large academic medical center: impact on clinical operations and patient disposition.

Authors:  Elizabeth Lee-Lewandrowski; Connie Chang; Kimberly Gregory; Kent Lewandrowski
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 3.786

7.  Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: risk factors and incidence estimation.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Sadowski; Lindsey K Bennett; Micah R Chan; Andrew L Wentland; Andrea L Garrett; Robert W Garrett; Arjang Djamali
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Prediction of GFR in liver transplant candidates.

Authors:  Paul A Skluzacek; Robert G Szewc; Charles R Nolan; Daniel J Riley; Shuko Lee; Pablo E Pergola
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 8.860

9.  Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy with systemic involvement.

Authors:  William W Ting; Mary Seabury Stone; Kathi C Madison; Kevin Kurtz
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2003-07

10.  Low-dose gadobenate dimeglumine versus standard dose gadopentetate dimeglumine for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver: an intra-individual crossover comparison.

Authors:  Gunther Schneider; Rainer Maas; Leo Schultze Kool; Ernst Rummeny; Hans-Bjorn Gehl; Klaus-Peter Lodemann; Miles A Kirchin
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.016

View more
  3 in total

1.  Long term prognosis of acute coronary syndrome with chronic renal dysfunction treated in different therapy units at department of cardiology: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Cong Fu; Zulong Sheng; Yuyu Yao; Xin Wang; Chaojun Yu; Genshan Ma
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

2.  Can a structured questionnaire identify patients with reduced renal function?

Authors:  Manal Azzouz; Janne Rømsing; Henrik S Thomsen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Post-contrast acute kidney injury. Part 2: risk stratification, role of hydration and other prophylactic measures, patients taking metformin and chronic dialysis patients : Recommendations for updated ESUR Contrast Medium Safety Committee guidelines.

Authors:  Aart J van der Molen; Peter Reimer; Ilona A Dekkers; Georg Bongartz; Marie-France Bellin; Michele Bertolotto; Olivier Clement; Gertraud Heinz-Peer; Fulvio Stacul; Judith A W Webb; Henrik S Thomsen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 5.315

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.