Literature DB >> 22830786

Interactive semiautomatic contour delineation using statistical conditional random fields framework.

Yu-Chi Hu1, Michael D Grossberg, Abraham Wu, Nadeem Riaz, Carmen Perez, Gig S Mageras.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Contouring a normal anatomical structure during radiation treatment planning requires significant time and effort. The authors present a fast and accurate semiautomatic contour delineation method to reduce the time and effort required of expert users.
METHODS: Following an initial segmentation on one CT slice, the user marks the target organ and nontarget pixels with a few simple brush strokes. The algorithm calculates statistics from this information that, in turn, determines the parameters of an energy function containing both boundary and regional components. The method uses a conditional random field graphical model to define the energy function to be minimized for obtaining an estimated optimal segmentation, and a graph partition algorithm to efficiently solve the energy function minimization. Organ boundary statistics are estimated from the segmentation and propagated to subsequent images; regional statistics are estimated from the simple brush strokes that are either propagated or redrawn as needed on subsequent images. This greatly reduces the user input needed and speeds up segmentations. The proposed method can be further accelerated with graph-based interpolation of alternating slices in place of user-guided segmentation. CT images from phantom and patients were used to evaluate this method. The authors determined the sensitivity and specificity of organ segmentations using physician-drawn contours as ground truth, as well as the predicted-to-ground truth surface distances. Finally, three physicians evaluated the contours for subjective acceptability. Interobserver and intraobserver analysis was also performed and Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate agreement.
RESULTS: Liver and kidney segmentations in patient volumetric CT images show that boundary samples provided on a single CT slice can be reused through the entire 3D stack of images to obtain accurate segmentation. In liver, our method has better sensitivity and specificity (0.925 and 0.995) than region growing (0.897 and 0.995) and level set methods (0.912 and 0.985) as well as shorter mean predicted-to-ground truth distance (2.13 mm) compared to regional growing (4.58 mm) and level set methods (8.55 mm and 4.74 mm). Similar results are observed in kidney segmentation. Physician evaluation of ten liver cases showed that 83% of contours did not need any modification, while 6% of contours needed modifications as assessed by two or more evaluators. In interobserver and intraobserver analysis, Bland-Altman plots showed our method to have better repeatability than the manual method while the delineation time was 15% faster on average.
CONCLUSIONS: Our method achieves high accuracy in liver and kidney segmentation and considerably reduces the time and labor required for contour delineation. Since it extracts purely statistical information from the samples interactively specified by expert users, the method avoids heuristic assumptions commonly used by other methods. In addition, the method can be expanded to 3D directly without modification because the underlying graphical framework and graph partition optimization method fit naturally with the image grid structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22830786      PMCID: PMC3412434          DOI: 10.1118/1.4728979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  17 in total

1.  Construction of an abdominal probabilistic atlas and its application in segmentation.

Authors:  Hyunjin Park; Peyton H Bland; Charles R Meyer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  What energy functions can be minimized via graph cuts?

Authors:  Vladimir Kolmogorov; Ramin Zabih
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.226

3.  Automated model-based organ delineation for radiotherapy planning in prostatic region.

Authors:  Vladimir Pekar; Todd R McNutt; Michael R Kaus
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Computer-aided measurement of liver volumes in CT by means of geodesic active contour segmentation coupled with level-set algorithms.

Authors:  Kenji Suzuki; Ryan Kohlbrenner; Mark L Epstein; Ademola M Obajuluwa; Jianwu Xu; Masatoshi Hori
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Interactive live-wire boundary extraction.

Authors:  W A Barrett; E N Mortensen
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Automatic liver segmentation technique for three-dimensional visualization of CT data.

Authors:  L Gao; D G Heath; B S Kuszyk; E K Fishman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Automatic segmentation of liver structure in CT images.

Authors:  K T Bae; M L Giger; C T Chen; C E Kahn
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Liver segmentation in living liver transplant donors: comparison of semiautomatic and manual methods.

Authors:  Laurent Hermoye; Ismael Laamari-Azjal; Zhujiang Cao; Laurence Annet; Jan Lerut; Benoit M Dawant; Bernard E Van Beers
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-11-24       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Does registration of PET and planning CT images decrease interobserver and intraobserver variation in delineating tumor volumes for non-small-cell lung cancer?

Authors:  Jana L Fox; Ramesh Rengan; William O'Meara; Ellen Yorke; Yusuf Erdi; Sadek Nehmeh; Steven A Leibel; Kenneth E Rosenzweig
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Comparison of human and automatic segmentations of kidneys from CT images.

Authors:  Manjori Rao; Joshua Stough; Yueh-Yun Chi; Keith Muller; Gregg Tracton; Stephen M Pizer; Edward L Chaney
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  5 in total

1.  Iterative mesh transformation for 3D segmentation of livers with cancers in CT images.

Authors:  Difei Lu; Yin Wu; Gordon Harris; Wenli Cai
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 4.790

2.  Semiautomatic tumor segmentation with multimodal images in a conditional random field framework.

Authors:  Yu-Chi Hu; Michael Grossberg; Gikas Mageras
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-06-28

3.  Accelerated learning-based interactive image segmentation using pairwise constraints.

Authors:  Jamshid Sourati; Deniz Erdogmus; Jennifer G Dy; Dana H Brooks
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 10.856

4.  Kidney segmentation in CT sequences using SKFCM and improved GrowCut algorithm.

Authors:  Hong Song; Wei Kang; Qian Zhang; Shuliang Wang
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2015-09-01

5.  Interactive contour delineation and refinement in treatment planning of image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Wu Zhou; Yaoqin Xie
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.