Literature DB >> 22830785

Radiation shielding materials and radiation scatter effects for interventional radiology (IR) physicians.

J P McCaffrey1, F Tessier, H Shen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure the attenuation effectiveness and minimize the weight of new non-Pb radiation shielding materials used for radiation protection by interventional radiology (IR) physicians, to compare the accuracy of the different standard measurement geometries of these materials, and to determine x-ray qualities that correspond to the scattered radiation that IR physicians typically encounter.
METHODS: Radiation attenuation capabilities of non-Pb materials were investigated. Typically, most studies of non-Pb materials have focused on the attenuating properties of metal powders. In this study, layers of materials incorporating non-Pb powdered compounds such as Bi(2)O(3), Gd(2)O(3), and BaSO(4) were measured individually, as bilayers, and as a Bi(2)O(3)-loaded hand cream. Attenuation measurements were performed in narrow-beam (fluorescence excluded) and broad beam (fluorescence included) geometries, demonstrating that these different geometries provided significantly different results. The Monte Carlo (MC) program EGSnrc was used to calculate the resulting spectra after attenuation by radiation shielding materials, and scattered x-ray spectra after 90° scattering of eight ASTM Standard primary x-ray beams. Surrogate x-ray qualities that corresponded to these scattered spectra were tabulated.
RESULTS: Radiation shielding materials incorporating Bi(2)O(3) were found to provide equivalent or superior attenuation compared with commercial Pb-based and non-Pb materials across the 60-130 kVp energy range. Measurements were made for single layers of the Bi(2)O(3) compound and for bilayers where the ordering was low atomic number (Z) layer closest to x-ray source∕high Z (Bi(2)O(3)) layer farthest from the x-ray source. Narrow-beam Standard test methods which do not include the contribution from fluorescence overestimated the attenuating capabilities of Pb and non-Pb materials. Measurements of a newly developed, quick-drying, and easily removable Bi(2)O(3)-loaded hand cream demonstrated better attenuation capabilities than commercial Bi(2)O(3)-loaded gloves. Scattered radiation measurements and MC simulations illustrated that the spectra resulting from 90° scattering of primary x-ray beam qualities can be approximated by surrogate x-ray qualities which are more representative of the radiation actually encountered by IR physicians. A table of surrogate qualities of the eight ASTM F2547-06 Standard qualities was compiled.
CONCLUSIONS: New non-Pb compound materials, particularly single layers or bilayers incorporating Bi(2)O(3), can reduce the weight of radiation protection materials while providing equivalent or better protection compared to Pb-based materials. Attenuation measurements in geometries that exclude the contribution from fluorescence substantially underestimate the quantity of transmitted radiation. A new Bi(2)O(3)-loaded hand cream demonstrated a novel and effective approach for hand protection. Standard testing protocols for radiation protection materials used by IR physicians specify a wider kVp range than is necessary. A more realistic range would acknowledge the lower kVp resulting from scatter and allow IR physicians to confidently utilize lighter-weight materials while still receiving adequate protection. Standards protocols incorporating the adjustments described in this work would maintain the safety of IR personnel and lessen the physical repercussions of long hours wearing unnecessarily heavy radiation protection garments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22830785     DOI: 10.1118/1.4730504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  7 in total

1.  Protection evaluation of non-lead radiation-shielding fabric: preliminary exposure-dose study.

Authors:  Ju Hee Kang; Song Hee Oh; Jung-Il Oh; Seong-Hun Kim; Yong-Suk Choi; Eui-Hwan Hwang
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 2.  What are useful methods to reduce occupational radiation exposure among radiological medical workers, especially for interventional radiology personnel?

Authors:  Koichi Chida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2022-05-24

3.  Assessment of the Radiation Attenuation Properties of Several Lead Free Composites by Monte Carlo Simulation.

Authors:  M Kazempour; M Saeedimoghadam; F Shekoohi Shooli; N Shokrpour
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2015-06-01

4.  Evaluation and verification of a simplified lead equivalency measurement method.

Authors:  Richard Ryan Wargo; Areej Fawzi Aljabal; Pei-Jan Paul Lin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Evaluation of lead equivalence of radiation protection apparatuses as a function of tube potential and spectral shaping filter.

Authors:  Areej Fawzi Aljabal; Richard Ryan Wargo; Pei-Jan Paul Lin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Characterisation and mapping of scattered radiation fields in interventional radiology theatres.

Authors:  M Nowak; P Carbonez; M Krauss; F R Verdun; J Damet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Assessment of Health Professionals' Attitudes on Radiation Protection Measures.

Authors:  Aspasia Goula; Athanasios Chatzis; Maria-Aggeliki Stamouli; Martha Kelesi; Evridiki Kaba; Emmanouil Brilakis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.