Literature DB >> 22829606

Providing supplemental milk to piglets preweaning improves the growth but not survival of gilt progeny compared with sow progeny.

Y J Miller1, A M Collins, R J Smits, P C Thomson, P K Holyoake.   

Abstract

Gilt progeny have lighter weaning weights and greater postweaning medication and mortality rates compared with the progeny of older parity sows. Because weaning weight has been positively correlated with postweaning survival, this study aimed to determine whether the provision of supplemental milk preweaning could improve weaning weight and subsequent weights as well as postweaning survival of gilt progeny. The study was replicated in summer and winter as the effects of supplemental milk were expected to vary with season. The progeny of 80 gilts (parity 0) and 80 sows (parity 2 to 5) were allocated to both treatments: with or without supplemental milk in these 2 seasons with 5 sheds/season. Litter size was standardized (10 to 11 piglets) and each piglet was weighed at birth, d 21, weaning (4 wk), and 10 wk of age. Medications and mortalities were recorded both preweaning and postweaning. Pigs were housed within treatment groups postweaning, and ADFI and G:F were measured. Gilt progeny were 200 g lighter at birth in both replicates (P < 0.001) and were 500 g lighter at weaning in the winter replicate (P < 0.05) compared with sow progeny. The provision of supplemental milk improved weaning weight for both gilt and sow progeny by 800 g in summer (P < 0.05) and by 350 g in winter (P < 0.05). This improvement in weaning weight had no effect on the incidence of death or disease in milk-supplemented progeny of either gilts or sows (P > 0.05). Supplemental milk disappearance (the daily difference between the volume of milk provided and the residue left in the drinker) was greater in summer than winter (by 130 mL/piglet d(-1); P < 0.05) as were the associated weaning weight benefits. The weaning weights of supplemented gilt progeny reached or exceeded that of nonsupplemented sow progeny. Gilt progeny had greater postweaning mortality (2.6%) and medication rates (6.2%) than sow progeny (1 and 2.2%, respectively; both P < 0.05) in both seasons, but medication rates were greater in winter (7.2%) for both treatment groups than in summer (1.9%; P < 0.05). Gilt progeny also had less postweaning ADFI than sow progeny in winter (528 and 636 g, respectively; P < 0.05) with no dam parity effect on G:F (both P > 0.05). The hypothesis that supplemental milk provision did increase gilt progeny weaning weight was supported (especially in summer) but the supplementation had no effect on postweaning weights and survival. Efforts to improve gilt progeny postweaning growth and survival need to be aimed at improving health and immunity, not just weaning weight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22829606     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2011-4272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  13 in total

1.  Sows in mid parity are best foster mothers for the pre- and post-weaning performance of both light and heavy piglets1.

Authors:  Anne M S Huting; Panagiotis Sakkas; Ilias Kyriazakis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Poorer lifetime growth performance of gilt progeny compared with sow progeny is largely due to weight differences at birth and reduced growth in the preweaning period, and is not improved by progeny segregation after weaning.

Authors:  J R Craig; C L Collins; K L Bunter; J J Cottrell; F R Dunshea; J R Pluske
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Effect of soybean expeller supplementation during the final phase of sow gestation on litter birth weight.

Authors:  Santiago Masi Mignaco; Ana Alba-Casals; Alicia Carranza; Julián Parada
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2020-07-02

4.  Effect of bovine colostrum feeding in comparison with milk replacer and natural feeding on the immune responses and colonisation of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in the intestinal tissue of piglets.

Authors:  Sugiharto Sugiharto; Ann-Sofie Riis Poulsen; Nuria Canibe; Charlotte Lauridsen
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.718

5.  Providing supplementary, artificial milk for large litters during lactation: effects on performance and health of sows and piglets: a case study.

Authors:  J Pustal; I Traulsen; R Preißler; K Müller; T Große Beilage; U Börries; N Kemper
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2015-10-09

6.  The effect of double nursing, an alternative nursing strategy for the hyper-prolific sow herd, on herd performance.

Authors:  Manon A M Houben; Tijs J Tobias; Manon M C Holstege
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2017-02-16

7.  Once small always small? To what extent morphometric characteristics and post-weaning starter regime affect pig lifetime growth performance.

Authors:  A M S Huting; P Sakkas; I Wellock; K Almond; I Kyriazakis
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2018-07-23

Review 8.  Using Nutritional Strategies to Shape the Gastro-Intestinal Tracts of Suckling and Weaned Piglets.

Authors:  Anne M S Huting; Anouschka Middelkoop; Xiaonan Guan; Francesc Molist
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 9.  Management and Feeding Strategies in Early Life to Increase Piglet Performance and Welfare around Weaning: A Review.

Authors:  Laia Blavi; David Solà-Oriol; Pol Llonch; Sergi López-Vergé; Susana María Martín-Orúe; José Francisco Pérez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  The effect of creep feed composition and form on pre- and post-weaning growth performance of pigs and the utilization of low-complexity nursery diets.

Authors:  Brenda Christensen; Lee-Anne Huber
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-11-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.