| Literature DB >> 22827830 |
Mieke C E Hermans1, Catharina G Faber, Sebastiaan C A M Bekkers, Christine E M de Die-Smulders, Monique M Gerrits, Ingemar S J Merkies, Gabriel Snoep, Yigal M Pinto, Simon Schalla.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (MD1) is a neuromuscular disorder with potential involvement of the heart and increased risk of sudden death. Considering the importance of cardiomyopathy as a predictor of prognosis, we aimed to systematically evaluate and describe structural and functional cardiac alterations in patients with MD1.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22827830 PMCID: PMC3461413 DOI: 10.1186/1532-429X-14-48
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ISSN: 1097-6647 Impact factor: 5.364
Clinical and genetic characteristics according to clinical phenotype category
| Male | 5 (56%) | 33 (52%) | 7 (88%) | 45 (56%) |
| Age in years (range) | 60 (46–70) | 47 (24–64) | 32 (24–51) | 48 (24–70) |
| Age at onset in years (range) | 52 (50–65)* | 27 (10–51) | 6.5 (0–10) | 27 (0–65) |
| Muscle strength sumscore (range) | 110 (107–110) | 96 (73–109) | 100 (78–109) | 98 (73–110) |
| Abnormal ECG | 1 (11%) | 41 (65%) | 7 (88%) | 49 (61%) |
| Abnormal CMR | 3 (33%) | 28 (44%) | 4 (50%) | 35 (44%) |
*age at onset of neuromuscular signs and symptoms could not be determined in 3 patients, since they were still asymptomatic.
CMR results
| LV ejection fraction, % (range) | 58 (38–73) | 57 (45–73) | 61 (38–71) |
| LV systolic dysfunction, n (%) | 20 (25%) | 16 (36%) | 4 (11%) |
| LV enddiastolic volume, ml/m2 (range) | 72 (38–117) | 77 (41–117) | 67 (38–104) |
| LV endsystolic volume, ml/m2 (range) | 31 (11–63) | 35 (14–63) | 28 (11–56) |
| LV dilatation, n (%) | 7 (9%) | 6 (13%) | 1 (3%) |
| LV mass, g/m2 (range) | 47(30–79) | 50 (36–79) | 41(30–67) |
| LV wall hypertrophy, n (%) | 6 (8%) | 4 (9%) | 2 (6%) |
| RV ejection fraction, % (range) | 64 (38–77) | 60 (38–77) | 67 (50–76) |
| RV systolic dysfunction, n (%) | 4 (5%) | 4 (9%) | 0 |
| RV enddiastolic volume, ml/m2 (range) | 66 (40–117) | 71 (40–117) | 61 (40–102) |
| RV endsystolic volume, ml/m2 (range) | 23 (10–66) | 28 (10–66) | 20 (10–46) |
| RV dilatation, n (%) | 1 (1%) | 1 (2%) | 0 |
| RV outflow tract, mm (range) | 26 (21–37) | 27 (22–37) | 25 (21–29) |
| Myocardial fibrosis, n (%) | 10 (13%) | 7 (16%) | 3 (9%) |
Figure 1Ventricular dysfunction in myotonic dystrophy type 1 by CMR. Cine images in four-chamber long-axis view in diastole and systole of a patient with impaired systolic left ventricular function (ejection fraction 38%): septal and apical hypokinesia (arrows).
Figure 2Myocardial fibrosis in myotonic dystrophy type 1 by CMR. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images in short axis (A, B and C) and 4-chamber long axis views (D) of 4 patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1. Between arrows are regions of increased signal intensity, indicating focal fibrosis, visible as mid-myocardial enhancement to epicardial enhancement with endocardial sparing.
Electrocardiography results
| Frequency, bpm (range) | 70 (40–95) |
| Sinusbradycardia, n (%) | 14 (18%) |
| Atrial fibrillation, n (%) | 2 (3%) |
| PR interval, ms (range) | 200 (136–460) |
| Prolonged PR interval, n (%) | 30 (38%) |
| QRS duration, ms (range) | 100 (80–164) |
| Intraventricular conduction delay, n (%) | 26 (33%) |
| Left anterior fascicular block, n (%) | 6 (8%) |
| Left posterior fascicular block, n (%) | 1 (1%) |
* sinusbradycardia was defined as frequency <60 bpm.
Figure 3Graphic reproduction of cardiac evaluation in myotonic dystrophy patients showing ECG and CMR findings. The majority of patients with ECG abnormalities had functional or structural cardiac abnormalities. However, a substantial number of patients with normal ECG also showed myocardial alterations. NT-proBNP levels did not help to distinguish between patients with and without impaired myocardial functioning (presented as median (range)).