Literature DB >> 2282774

The structure of graphemic representations.

A Caramazza1, G Miceli.   

Abstract

The analysis of the spelling performance of a brain-damaged dysgraphic subject is reported. The subject's spelling performance was affected by various graphotactic factors, such as the distinction between consonant and vowel and graphosyllabic structure. For example, while the subject produced many consonant and vowel deletion errors when these were part of consonant and vowel clusters, respectively (e.g., sfondo----sondo; giunta----gunta), deletions were virtually never produced for single consonants flanked by two vowels (e.g., onesto----oesto) or for single vowels flanked by two consonants (e.g., tirare----trare). The demonstration that graphosyllabic factors affect spelling performance disconfirms the hypothesis that graphemic representations consist simply of linearly ordered sets of graphemes. It is concluded that graphemic representations are multidimensional structures: one dimension specifies the grapheme identities that comprise the spelling of a word; a second dimension specifies the consonant/vowel status of the graphemes; a third dimension represents the graphosyllabic structure of the grapheme string; and, a fourth dimension provides information about geminate features.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2282774     DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90047-n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  25 in total

1.  Processing complex graphemes in handwriting production.

Authors:  Sonia Kandel; Elsa Spinelli
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-09

2.  Representation of letter position in spelling: evidence from acquired dysgraphia.

Authors:  Simon Fischer-Baum; Michael McCloskey; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-04-08

3.  Impact of phonology on the generation of handwritten responses: evidence from picture-word interference tasks.

Authors:  Qingfang Zhang; Markus F Damian
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

4.  Shared orthographic neuronal representations for spelling and reading.

Authors:  Jeremy J Purcell; Xiong Jiang; Guinevere F Eden
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  The independence of letter identity and letter doubling in reading.

Authors:  Simon Fischer-Baum
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

6.  Temporal stability and representational distinctiveness: key functions of orthographic working memory.

Authors:  Vanessa Costa; Simon Fischer-Baum; Rita Capasso; Gabriele Miceli; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Distinctions between orthographic long-term memory and working memory.

Authors:  Adam Buchwald; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Neural bases of orthographic long-term memory and working memory in dysgraphia.

Authors:  Brenda Rapp; Jeremy Purcell; Argye E Hillis; Rita Capasso; Gabriele Miceli
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Single-case cognitive neuropsychology in the age of big data.

Authors:  Jared Medina; Simon Fischer-Baum
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Developmental dysgraphia: An overview and framework for research.

Authors:  Michael McCloskey; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.