Literature DB >> 22826625

Gender preference and implications for screening colonoscopy: impact of endoscopy nurses.

Vui Heng Chong1.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the gender preferences, specifically the gender of the nursing staff (endoscopy assistants) and the impact on acceptance for screening colonoscopy (SC).
METHODS: Patients or relatives attending the clinics or health care workers working in a tertiary center were invited to participate in this questionnaire study. The questionnaire enquired on the general demographics (1) age, gender, ethnicity, education level, and employment status, previous history of colonoscopy, family or personal history of colonic pathologies, personal and family history of any cancers; (2) subjects were asked if they would go for an SC if they had appropriate indications (age over 50 years, family history of colorectal cancer (CRC), fecal occult blood positive, anemia especially iron deficiency anemia, bleeding per rectum with or without loss of appetite, weight loss and abdominal pain) with and without symptoms attributable to CRC; and (3) preferences for the gender of the endoscopists and assistants and whether they would still undergo SC even if their preferences were not met.
RESULTS: Eighty-four point seven percent (470/550) completed questionnaire were analysed. More female subjects expressed gender preferences for the endoscopists [overall 70%; female (67.7%) and male (2.3%)] compared to male subjects [overall 62.8%; male (56%) and female (6.8%), P = 0.102]. Similarly, more female subjects expressed gender preferences for the assistants [overall 74.5%; female (73.4%) and male (1.1%)] compared to male subjects [overall 58%, male (49.3%) and female (8.7%), P < 0.001]. Overall, a third would decline an SC, despite having appropriate indications, if their preferences were not met. On univariate analysis, male gender, non-Malay ethnicity (Chinese and others) and previous colonoscopy experience were more likely to undergo an SC, even if their preferences were not met (all P < 0.05). Gender and previous experience [odds ratio (OR) 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-2.82, P < 0.05] with colonoscopy (OR 4.70, 95% CI 1.41-15.66, P < 0.05) remained significant on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION: Genders preference for the endoscopy nurses/assistants is more common than for the endoscopist among women and has implications for the success of a screening colonoscopy program.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Endoscopy; Gender preference; Patient satisfaction; Screening colonoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22826625      PMCID: PMC3400862          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  24 in total

Review 1.  Career obstacles for women in medicine: an overview.

Authors:  V Reed; B Buddeberg-Fischer
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  Women in surgery: a survey in Switzerland.

Authors:  Reto Kaderli; Ulrich Guller; Brigitte Muff; Ulrich Stefenelli; Adrian Businger
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2010-11

3.  Preferences for ethnicity and sex of endoscopists in a Hispanic population in the United States.

Authors:  Jorge A Zapatier; Anand R Kumar; Alejandro Perez; Rodolfo Guevara; Alison Schneider
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Women patients' preference for women physicians is a barrier to colon cancer screening.

Authors:  Stacy B Menees; John M Inadomi; Sheryl Korsnes; Grace H Elta
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Colorectal cancer screening behavior and willingness: an outpatient survey in China.

Authors:  Shang-Xin Deng; Jie Gao; Wei An; Jie Yin; Quan-Cai Cai; Hua Yang; Zhao-Shen Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Gender disparity in the practice of gastroenterology: the first 5 years of a career.

Authors:  Carol A Burke; Suriya V Sastri; Gordon Jacobsen; Freda L Arlow; Robyn G Karlstadt; Patricia Raymond
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Sex and familiarity of colonoscopists: patient preferences.

Authors:  H Fidler; A Hartnett; K Cheng Man; I Derbyshire; M Sheil
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths.

Authors:  Ann G Zauber; Sidney J Winawer; Michael J O'Brien; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; Benjamin F Hankey; Weiji Shi; John H Bond; Melvin Schapiro; Joel F Panish; Edward T Stewart; Jerome D Waye
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Women are different from men.

Authors:  Grace H Elta
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Patient preferences for gender of endoscopists.

Authors:  Shyam Varadarajulu; Carol Petruff; William H Ramsey
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  4 in total

1.  Israeli Druze women's sex preferences when choosing obstetricians and gynecologists.

Authors:  Jonia Amer-Alshiek; Tahani Alshiek; Yifat Amir Levy; Foad Azem; Ami Amit; Hadar Amir
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2015-06-01

2.  Reflecting strategic and conforming gendered experiences of community health workers using photovoice in rural Wakiso district, Uganda.

Authors:  David Musoke; Charles Ssemugabo; Rawlance Ndejjo; Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho; Asha S George
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2018-08-22

3.  Equity and Gender Issues Among Members of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology.

Authors:  Sheron Perera; Lana Bistritz; Melanie D Beaton
Journal:  J Can Assoc Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-08-28

4.  Identifying Gender Barriers for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Assessing the Need for a Multigender Endoscopy Team: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Harshit S Khara; Darshan Suthar; Marika Bergenstock; Andrea Berger; Jessica L McKee; Dana Stewart; Samuel R Theis; Michael Komar; Amitpal S Johal; Diego R Valencia Chavez; William B Hale; Rakhee Mangla
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 12.045

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.