Literature DB >> 21184874

Preferences for ethnicity and sex of endoscopists in a Hispanic population in the United States.

Jorge A Zapatier1, Anand R Kumar, Alejandro Perez, Rodolfo Guevara, Alison Schneider.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preferences toward endoscopists have been shown to be a barrier to colorectal cancer screening in certain patient populations.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate sex and ethnicity preferences for endoscopists in a largely Hispanic population.
METHODS: This was a prospective cross-sectional study. Patients were given an anonymous questionnaire in which information on demographics and sex/ethnic preferences for endoscopists was determined. Bivariate and multivariate models were used to assess factors that affected outcome variables.
RESULTS: A total of 438 patients were included (213 men, 225 women; mean age 62 years). Predominant ethnicities were white (44%) and Hispanic (45%). Twenty-six percent and 17% of patients expressed sex and ethnicity preferences, respectively. Women (30.8%), particularly Hispanic women (35%), had a sex preference more often than men (20.4%; P < .05). Hispanics had an ethnicity preference more often than white patients (P < .01). Lower education level, being a first-generation immigrant, family history of colorectal cancer, having a concurrent preference for obstetrician/gynecologist, and ethnicity preference for endoscopist were associated with the presence of a sex preference for the endoscopist (P < .05). Being a first-generation immigrant and having an ethnicity preference for a primary care provider or the sex of the endoscopist were significantly associated with a preference for the ethnicity of the endoscopist (P < .05). LIMITATIONS: Results are based on self-report. Limited study factors were also assessed.
CONCLUSIONS: Among a predominant Hispanic population, sex and ethnicity preferences for endoscopists are often seen. They may coexist, increase the likelihood of the presence of one when the other is present, and likely influence compliance with colorectal cancer screening.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21184874     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  7 in total

Review 1.  Characterization of the Hispanic or latino population in health research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Abraham Aragones; Susan L Hayes; Mei Hsuan Chen; Javier González; Francesca M Gany
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-06

2.  Gender preference and implications for screening colonoscopy: impact of endoscopy nurses.

Authors:  Vui Heng Chong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Gender preference for the endoscopist among Hispanics: the results of a prospective study.

Authors:  Apurv Varia; Mihir K Patel; Rajasekhar Tanikella; Victor I Machicao; Michael B Fallon; Frank J Lukens
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-10

4.  Change to FIT increased CRC screening rates: evaluation of a US screening outreach program.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Liles; Nancy Perrin; Ana Gabriela Rosales; Adrianne C Feldstein; David H Smith; David M Mosen; Jennifer L Schneider
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 5.  Eliciting vulnerable patients' preferences regarding colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Samuel J Lee; Meghan C O'Leary; Karl E Umble; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.711

6.  Factors Contributing to Non-Attendance of GI Endoscopic Procedures in a Tertiary Care Center in the Middle East.

Authors:  Israa Hadaib; Pascale Anglade; Halah Ibrahim
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2022-01-01

7.  The preference for an endoscopist specific sex: a link between ethnic origin, religious belief, socioeconomic status, and procedure type.

Authors:  Adi Lahat; Yehudith Assouline-Dayan; Lior H Katz; Herma H Fidder
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 2.711

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.