Literature DB >> 17967136

Algorithm-based qualitative and semiquantitative identification of prevalent vertebral fracture: agreement between different readers, imaging modalities, and diagnostic approaches.

Lynne Ferrar1, Guirong Jiang, John T Schousboe, Charles R DeBold, Richard Eastell.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We compared SQ and ABQ diagnosis of VF imaged by radiography and X-ray absorptiometry. Mild ABQ VF had stronger associations with osteoporosis than mild SQ VF. Interobserver agreement (radiographic diagnosis) was better for ABQ.
INTRODUCTION: Vertebral fracture (VF) assessment from images acquired by X-ray absorptiometry (VFA) is often based on a semiquantitative approach (SQ); prevalent VF is identified if vertebral height appears reduced by >20%. Algorithm-based qualitative definition of osteoporotic VF (ABQ) requires evidence of endplate depression, and there is no threshold for reduction in vertebral height. The aims of this study were to (1) compare the prevalence of VFs; (2) compare the characteristics of women with and without VFs; (3) compare interobserver agreement; and (4) compare agreement between methods and imaging modalities for ABQ and SQ definitions of VFs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Spine radiographs and absorptiometry images for 203 elderly women were assessed using ABQ (readers ABQ-1 and ABQ-2). These readings were compared with SQ assessments (readers SQ-1 and SQ-2) of the same images performed in a previous study. Agreement between readers and methods was assessed by kappa (kappa) statistics.
RESULTS: The prevalence of VF was 15-18% (radiography) and 12-24% (VFA) for ABQ and SQ, respectively. Women with ABQ or SQ fractures were older and had lower BMD than those without fracture (p < 0.01). Mild ABQ (but not SQ) VF was associated with low BMD. Kappa scores for interobserver agreement for radiography and VFA, respectively, were as follows: ABQ, kappa = 0.74 (95% CI, 0.60, 0.87) and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.48, 0.81); SQ, kappa = 0.53 (95% CI, 0.46, 0.60) and 0.51 (95% CI, 0.44, 0.58). For agreement between ABQ-1 and SQ-1, kappa = 0.55 (95% CI, 0.39, 0.72) for radiography and 0.41 (95% CI, 0.25, 0.58 for VFA.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of radiographic VF identified by ABQ and SQ was similar, but on VFA was 50% higher for SQ. Mild ABQ VF was associated with low BMD. Interobserver agreement for radiographic diagnosis was significantly better for ABQ than for SQ. Agreement between ABQ and SQ was moderate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17967136     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.071032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  28 in total

1.  Intra-and inter-reader reliability of semi-automated quantitative morphometry measurements and vertebral fracture assessment using lateral scout views from computed tomography.

Authors:  Y M Kim; S Demissie; R Eisenberg; E J Samelson; D P Kiel; M L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Association between incident and baseline vertebral fractures in European women: vertebral fracture assessment in the Osteoporosis and Ultrasound Study (OPUS).

Authors:  L Ferrar; C Roux; D Felsenberg; C-C Glüer; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Impact of level of expertise versus the statistical tool on vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) readings in cohort studies.

Authors:  B Aubry-Rozier; I Fabreguet; K Iglesias; O Lamy; D Hans
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Corrigendum to how to define an osteoporotic vertebral fracture.

Authors: 
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-11

5.  Identification of prevalent vertebral fractures using CT lateral scout views: a comparison of semi-automated quantitative vertebral morphometry and radiologist semi-quantitative grading.

Authors:  Y M Kim; S Demissie; H K Genant; X Cheng; W Yu; E J Samelson; D P Kiel; M L Bouxsein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Quantitative vertebral morphometry based on parametric modeling of vertebral bodies in 3D.

Authors:  D Stern; V Njagulj; B Likar; F Pernuš; T Vrtovec
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Review of radiological scoring methods of osteoporotic vertebral fractures for clinical and research settings.

Authors:  Ling Oei; Fernando Rivadeneira; Felisia Ly; Stephan J Breda; M Carola Zillikens; Albert Hofman; André G Uitterlinden; Gabriel P Krestin; Edwin H G Oei
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) by lateral DXA scanning may be cost-effective when used as part of fracture liaison services or primary care screening.

Authors:  E M Clark; L Carter; V C Gould; L Morrison; J H Tobias
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Quantitative, 3D Visualization of the Initiation and Progression of Vertebral Fractures Under Compression and Anterior Flexion.

Authors:  Timothy M Jackman; Amira I Hussein; Cameron Curtiss; Paul M Fein; Anderson Camp; Lidia De Barros; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Vertebral fracture assessment: impact of instrument and reader.

Authors:  B Buehring; D Krueger; M Checovich; D Gemar; N Vallarta-Ast; H K Genant; N Binkley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.