Literature DB >> 22825034

Large quantity discrimination by North Island robins (Petroica longipes).

Alexis Garland1, Jason Low, Kevin C Burns.   

Abstract

While numerosity-representation and enumeration of different numbers of objects-and quantity discrimination in particular have been studied in a wide range of species, very little is known about the numerical abilities of animals in the wild. This study examined spontaneous relative quantity judgments (RQJs) by wild North Island robins (Petroica longipes) of New Zealand. In Experiment 1, robins were tested on a range of numerical values of up to 14 versus 16 items, which were sequentially presented and hidden. In Experiment 2, the same numerical contrasts were tested on a different group of subjects but quantities were presented as whole visible sets. Experiment 3 involved whole visible sets that comprised of exceedingly large quantities of up to 56 versus 64 items. While robins shared with other species a ratio-based representation system for representing very large values, they also appeared to have developed an object indexing system with an extended upper limit (well beyond 4) that may be an evolutionary response to ecological challenges faced by scatter-hoarding birds. These results suggest that cognitive mechanism influencing an understanding of physical quantity may be deployed more flexibly in some contexts than previously thought, and are discussed in light of findings across other mammalian and avian species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22825034     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-012-0537-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  29 in total

1.  Operational momentum for magnitude ordering in preschool children and adults.

Authors:  Hannah Dunn; Nicky Bernstein; Maria Dolores de Hevia; Viola Macchi Cassia; Hermann Bulf; Koleen McCrink
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2018-12-15

2.  Elephants have a nose for quantity.

Authors:  Joshua M Plotnik; Daniel L Brubaker; Rachel Dale; Lydia N Tiller; Hannah S Mumby; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Does the approximate number system serve as a foundation for symbolic mathematics?

Authors:  Emily Szkudlarek; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2017-01-31

Review 4.  Understanding the origin of number sense: a review of fish studies.

Authors:  Christian Agrillo; Angelo Bisazza
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Numerical assessment in the wild: insights from social carnivores.

Authors:  Sarah Benson-Amram; Geoff Gilfillan; Karen McComb
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Numerical ordinality in a wild nectarivore.

Authors:  Tas I F Vámos; Maria C Tello-Ramos; T Andrew Hurly; Susan D Healy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Developmental dyscalculia.

Authors:  Karin Kucian; Michael von Aster
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  Capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) treat small and large numbers of items similarly during a relative quantity judgment task.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

9.  Defining value through quantity and quality-Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) undervalue food quantities when items are broken.

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Theodore A Evans; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  What counts for 'counting'? Chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes, respond appropriately to relevant and irrelevant information in a quantity judgment task.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Joseph M McIntyre; Alexis Garland; Theodore A Evans
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.844

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.