Literature DB >> 22824784

The delivered dose: Applying particokinetics to in vitro investigations of nanoparticle internalization by macrophages.

Raha Ahmad Khanbeigi1, Abhinav Kumar, Fethi Sadouki, Chris Lorenz, Ben Forbes, Lea Ann Dailey, Helen Collins.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of nanoparticle dosimetry on the interpretation of results from in vitro experiments involving particle-cell interactions. Three different dose metrics were evaluated: 1) The administered dose (particle mass, number or surface area administered per volume media at the onset of an experiment), 2) the delivered dose (particle mass, number or surface area to reach the cell monolayer via diffusion and sedimentation over the duration of an experiment) and 3) the cellular dose (particle mass, number or surface area internalized by the cells during the experiment). The In Vitro Sedimentation and Diffusion and Dosimetry model (ISDD) was used to calculate particle sedimentation and diffusion in cell culture media to predict delivered dose values. These were compared with administered doses and experimentally determined cellular dose values.
METHODS: Dosing conditions and predicted delivered dose values were computed in silico using ISDD. In vitro cell association experiments were performed by exposing fluorescently labelled polystyrene beads of 50, 100, 200, 700 and 1000nm diameter to J774A.1 macrophage-like cells and determining the internalized particle content (cellular dose) via fluorescence spectroscopy. Experiments were repeated using lipopolysachharide (LPS) to activate and cytochalasin D to inhibit phagocytosis.
RESULTS: Only a small fraction (0.03-0.33%) of the administered dose was able to interact with the cells for all particle sizes tested. Measured cellular doses in non-activated J774A.1 cells corresponded well with computed delivered dose values for all particle sizes tested under six different exposure conditions. When cellular doses were averaged and normalized to their corresponding delivered doses, the percentage values of cell-associated particles were: 36 ± 10%(50 nm), 15 ± 3%(100 nm), 22 ± 6%(200 nm), 18 ± 4%(700 nm), and 42 ± 19%(1000 nm). Activation of J774A.1 cells with LPS significantly increased the cellular dose (normalized to the delivered dose) in all particle sizes except 50 nm, while cytochalasin D treatment significantly reduced the cellular dose of 100, 200 and 1000 nm particles.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that dose correction using the ISDD model (i.e. normalization of cellular dose values to the delivered dose) is essential for accurate interpretation of results derived from in vitro particle-cell interaction studies (e.g. particle uptake, cytotoxicity, mechanisms of action, pharmacodynamic studies, etc.). It is of particular relevance to the field of particulate drug delivery systems, because the low density nature of most biomaterials used as drug carriers will result in very low fractions of the administered particle dose reaching the cell monolayer under most commonly used experimental conditions.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22824784     DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.07.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  20 in total

1.  Implications of in vitro dosimetry on toxicological ranking of low aspect ratio engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  Anoop K Pal; Dhimiter Bello; Joel Cohen; Philip Demokritou
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 5.913

2.  Reaction of monocytes to polystyrene and silica nanoparticles in short-term and long-term exposures.

Authors:  Maria Mrakovcic; Claudia Meindl; Eva Roblegg; Eleonore Fröhlich
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 3.524

3.  Quantification of Internalized Silica Nanoparticles via STED Microscopy.

Authors:  Henrike Peuschel; Thomas Ruckelshausen; Christian Cavelius; Annette Kraegeloh
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Value of phagocyte function screening for immunotoxicity of nanoparticles in vivo.

Authors:  Eleonore Fröhlich
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-05-26

5.  Estimating the effective density of engineered nanomaterials for in vitro dosimetry.

Authors:  Glen DeLoid; Joel M Cohen; Tom Darrah; Raymond Derk; Liying Rojanasakul; Georgios Pyrgiotakis; Wendel Wohlleben; Philip Demokritou
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Factors affecting the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of PEGylated liposomal irinotecan (IHL-305) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Huali Wu; Jeffrey R Infante; Vicki L Keedy; Suzanne F Jones; Emily Chan; Johanna C Bendell; Wooin Lee; Whitney P Kirschbrown; Beth A Zamboni; Satoshi Ikeda; Hiroshi Kodaira; Mace L Rothenberg; Howard A Burris; William C Zamboni
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-02-10

7.  Paracelsus in nanotoxicology.

Authors:  Dominique Lison; Giulia Vietti; Sybille van den Brule
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 9.400

Review 8.  Cellular targets and mechanisms in the cytotoxic action of non-biodegradable engineered nanoparticles.

Authors:  Eleonore Fröhlich
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 9.  Review and Evaluation of the Potential Health Effects of Oxidic Nickel Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Sharlee L More; Michael Kovochich; Tara Lyons-Darden; Michael Taylor; Alexandra M Schulte; Amy K Madl
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 5.076

10.  An integrated approach for the in vitro dosimetry of engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  Joel M Cohen; Justin G Teeguarden; Philip Demokritou
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 9.400

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.