Literature DB >> 22824159

The effect of in situ augmentation on implant anchorage in proximal humeral head fractures.

Stefan Unger1, Stefanie Erhart, Franz Kralinger, Michael Blauth, Werner Schmoelz.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Fracture fixation in patients suffering from osteoporosis is difficult as sufficient implant anchorage is not always possible. One method to enhance implant anchorage is implant/screw augmentation with PMMA-cement. The present study investigated the feasibility of implant augmentation with PMMA-cement to enhance implant anchorage in the proximal humerus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A simulated three part humeral head fracture was stabilised with an angular stable plating system in 12 pairs of humeri using six head screws. In the augmentation group the proximal four screws were treated with four cannulated screws, each augmented with 0.5ml of PMMA-cement, whereas the contra lateral side served as a non-augmented control. Specimens were loaded in varus-bending or axial-rotation using a cyclic loading protocol with increasing load magnitude until failure of the osteosynthesis occurred.
RESULTS: Augmented specimens showed a significant higher number of load cycles until failure than non-augment specimens (varus-bending: 8516 (SD 951.6) vs. 5583 (SD 2273.6), P=0.014; axial-rotation: 3316 (SD 348.8) vs. 2050 (SD 656.5), P=0.003). Non-augmented specimens showed a positive correlation of load cycles until failure and measured bone mineral density (varus-bending: r=0.893, P=0.016; axial-rotation: r=0.753, P=0.084), whereas no correlation was present in augmented specimens (varus-bending: r=0,258, P=0.621; axial-rotation r=0.127, P=0.810).
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that augmentation of cannulated screws is a feasible method to enhance implant/screw anchorage in the humeral head. The improvement of screw purchase is increasing with decreasing bone mineral density.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22824159     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  20 in total

1.  Effect of augmentation techniques on the failure of pedicle screws under cranio-caudal cyclic loading.

Authors:  Richard Bostelmann; Alexander Keiler; Hans Jakob Steiger; Armin Scholz; Jan Frederick Cornelius; Werner Schmoelz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A pedicle screw system and a lamina hook system provide similar primary and long-term stability: a biomechanical in vitro study with quasi-static and dynamic loading conditions.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Wilke; Dominik Kaiser; David Volkheimer; Carsten Hackenbroch; Klaus Püschel; Michael Rauschmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of straight antegrade nailing in proximal humeral fractures: the rationale of the "proximal anchoring point".

Authors:  Simon A Euler; Maximilian Petri; Melanie B Venderley; Grant J Dornan; Werner Schmoelz; Travis Lee Turnbull; Michael Plecko; Franz S Kralinger; Peter J Millett
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Timing of PMMA cement application for pedicle screw augmentation affects screw anchorage.

Authors:  Werner Schmoelz; Christian Heinz Heinrichs; Sven Schmidt; Angel R Piñera; Felix Tome-Bermejo; Javier M Duart; Marlies Bauer; Luis Álvarez Galovich
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  [Augmentation in the treatment of proximal humeral and femoral fractures].

Authors:  Nicole M van Veelen; Frank Jp Beeres; Björn-Christian Link; Reto Babst
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-04-13

6.  [Augmentation technique on the proximal humerus].

Authors:  A Scola; F Gebhard; G Röderer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Does metaphyseal cement augmentation in fracture management influence the adjacent subchondral bone and joint cartilage?: an in vivo study in sheep stifle joints.

Authors:  Michael Goetzen; Ladina Hofmann-Fliri; Daniel Arens; Stephan Zeiter; Vincent Stadelmann; Dirk Nehrbass; R Geoff Richards; Michael Blauth
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 8.  The Applications of Finite Element Analysis in Proximal Humeral Fractures.

Authors:  Yongyu Ye; Wei You; Weimin Zhu; Jiaming Cui; Kang Chen; Daping Wang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2017-09-10       Impact factor: 2.238

9.  Operative treatment of 2-part surgical neck fractures of the proximal humerus (AO 11-A3) in the elderly: Cement augmented locking plate Philos™ vs. proximal humerus nail MultiLoc®.

Authors:  Tobias Helfen; Georg Siebenbürger; Marcel Mayer; Wolfgang Böcker; Ben Ockert; Florian Haasters
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Humeral Tip-apex-distance as a Prognostic Marker for Proximal Humeral Fractures in 203 Patients.

Authors:  Dominik Saul; Tobias Himmelmann; Klaus Dresing
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2017-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.