Literature DB >> 22824117

The concept of error and malpractice in radiology.

Antonio Pinto1, Luca Brunese, Fabio Pinto, Riccardo Reali, Stefania Daniele, Luigia Romano.   

Abstract

Since the early 1970s, physicians have been subjected to an increasing number of medical malpractice claims. Radiology is one of the specialties most liable to claims of medical negligence. The etiology of radiological error is multifactorial. Errors fall into recurrent patterns. Errors arise from poor technique, failures of perception, lack of knowledge, and misjudgments. Every radiologist should understand the sources of error in diagnostic radiology as well as the elements of negligence that form the basis of malpractice litigation. Errors are an inevitable part of human life, and every health professional has made mistakes. To improve patient safety and reduce the risk from harm, we must accept that some errors are inevitable during the delivery of health care. We must play a cultural change in medicine, wherein errors are actively sought, openly discussed, and aggressively addressed.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22824117     DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2012.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR        ISSN: 0887-2171            Impact factor:   1.875


  25 in total

Review 1.  Long head of the biceps tendon and rotator interval.

Authors:  M Zappia; A Reginelli; A Russo; G F D'Agosto; F Di Pietto; E A Genovese; F Coppolino; L Brunese
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2013-08-15

2.  Lesions of the rotator cuff footprint: diagnostic performance of MR arthrography compared with arthroscopy.

Authors:  L P Stoppino; P Ciuffreda; M Rossi; M Lelario; C Bristogiannis; R Vinci; E A Genovese; L Macarini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2013-08-15

Review 3.  Physician centred imaging interpretation is dying out - why should I be a nuclear medicine physician?

Authors:  Roland Hustinx
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Errors in multidetector row computed tomography.

Authors:  M A Mazzei; L Volterrani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 5.  Errors in neuroradiology.

Authors:  Ferdinando Caranci; Enrico Tedeschi; Giuseppe Leone; Alfonso Reginelli; Gianluca Gatta; Antonio Pinto; Ettore Squillaci; Francesco Briganti; Luca Brunese
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 6.  Artificial intelligence as an emerging technology in the current care of neurological disorders.

Authors:  Urvish K Patel; Arsalan Anwar; Sidra Saleem; Preeti Malik; Bakhtiar Rasul; Karan Patel; Robert Yao; Ashok Seshadri; Mohammed Yousufuddin; Kogulavadanan Arumaithurai
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Do radiologists need to review abdominal ultrasound examinations reported as 'normal' by the sonographer?

Authors:  Martin Necas; Yi Shen; Qi Hao Ong; Kara Prout; Wendy Wackrow
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2020-02-28

Review 8.  Rehabilitation and surgical management of ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  E Lubrano; D Astorri; M Taddeo; A Salzmann; E Cesarano; L Brunese; M Giganti; A Spadaro
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2013-08-15

9.  Sources of error in emergency ultrasonography.

Authors:  Antonio Pinto; Fabio Pinto; Angela Faggian; Giuseppe Rubini; Ferdinando Caranci; Luca Macarini; Eugenio Annibale Genovese; Luca Brunese
Journal:  Crit Ultrasound J       Date:  2013-07-15

10.  Diagnosis of Cerebral Aneurysm Via Magnetic Resonance Angiography Screening: Emphasis on Legal Responsibility Increases False Positive Rate.

Authors:  Su-Hee Cho; Ji-Ye Lee; Kyeong-Hwa Ryu; Dae Chul Suh
Journal:  Neurointervention       Date:  2018-03-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.