Literature DB >> 23949942

Lesions of the rotator cuff footprint: diagnostic performance of MR arthrography compared with arthroscopy.

L P Stoppino1, P Ciuffreda, M Rossi, M Lelario, C Bristogiannis, R Vinci, E A Genovese, L Macarini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance arthrography (MR-A) of the shoulder in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears involving the humeral insertion of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendon (footprint), using arthroscopy as the reference standard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population included 90 consecutive patients with history and clinical diagnosis of instability of the shoulder, rotator cuff tear or posterosuperior glenoid impingement. A total of 108 MR arthrograms were performed, since 18 patients had undergone a bilateral procedure. Arthroscopy, which was performed within 45 days after MR-A, was used as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values were then calculated.
RESULTS: Magnetic resonance arthrography showed a sensitivity of 92 % and a specificity of 78 % for the overall detection of tears involving the rotator cuff footprint. The diagnostic accuracy was 90 %, and the positive and negative predictive values were 95 and 64 %, respectively. Ten lesions were non-classifiable on surgery, of which eight were non-classifiable on MR-A also.
CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance arthrography is extremely accurate for the detection and classification of rotator cuff footprint tears. Most of these lesions are articular-sided (partial articular-sided supraspinatus tendon avulsion lesions) with predominance in younger patients and concealed type of tear (concealed interstitial delamination lesions).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23949942     DOI: 10.1007/s12306-013-0289-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg        ISSN: 2035-5114


  28 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder: rotator cuff.

Authors:  Jenny T Bencardino; Ana I Garcia; William E Palmer
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-02

2.  Rim-rent tear of the rotator cuff: a common and easily overlooked partial tear.

Authors:  Emily N Vinson; Clyde A Helms; Laurence D Higgins
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Current perspectives on rotator cuff anatomy.

Authors:  Michael J DeFranco; Brian J Cole
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Tears at the rotator cuff footprint: prevalence and imaging characteristics in 305 MR arthrograms of the shoulder.

Authors:  Christoph Schaeffeler; Dirk Mueller; Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Petra Wolf; Ernst J Rummeny; Klaus Woertler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  MR arthrography of the shoulder: comparison with conventional MR imaging.

Authors:  B Flannigan; S Kursunoglu-Brahme; S Snyder; R Karzel; W Del Pizzo; D Resnick
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  MR arthrography of partial thickness tears of the undersurface of the rotator cuff: an arthroscopic correlation.

Authors:  Keith Meister; Jim Thesing; William J Montgomery; Peter A Indelicato; Steve Walczak; William Fontenot
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Sacroplasty for local or massive localization of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Antonio Basile; Dimitrios Tsetis; Maide Cavalli; Paolo Fiumara; Francesco Di Raimondo; Francesco Coppolino; Carmelo Coppolino; Elena Mundo; Carla Desiderio; Antonio Granata; Maria Teresa Patti
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  3-T MRI of the shoulder: is MR arthrography necessary?

Authors:  Thomas Magee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Pathology and pathogenesis of the intratendinous tearing of the rotator cuff viewed from en bloc histologic sections.

Authors:  H Fukuda; K Hamada; T Nakajima; A Tomonaga
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Anterior versus posterior, and rim-rent rotator cuff tears: prevalence and MR sensitivity.

Authors:  M J Tuite; J R Turnbull; J F Orwin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  5 in total

1.  Arthroscopic treatment for intratendinous rotator cuff tear results in satisfactory clinical outcomes and structural integrity.

Authors:  Sang Jin Cheon; Hyo Yeol Lee; Woong Ki Jeon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Detecting Rotator Cuff Tears: A Network Meta-analysis of 144 Diagnostic Studies.

Authors:  Fanxiao Liu; Jinlei Dong; Wun-Jer Shen; Qinglin Kang; Dongsheng Zhou; Fei Xiong
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-02-05

3.  Comparison of magnetic resonance arthrography with arthroscopy for imaging of shoulder injuries: retrospective study.

Authors:  R Saqib; J Harris; L Funk
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography, MRI and MR arthrography in the characterisation of rotator cuff disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jean-Sébastien Roy; Caroline Braën; Jean Leblond; François Desmeules; Clermont E Dionne; Joy C MacDermid; Nathalie J Bureau; Pierre Frémont
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Outcomes and Tendon Integrity After Arthroscopic Treatment for Articular-Sided Partial-Thickness Tears of the Supraspinatus Tendon: Results at Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Matthias Brockmeyer; Alexander Haupert; Anna-Lena Lausch; Gudrun Wagenpfeil; Jonas Stroeder; Guenther Schneider; Dieter Kohn; Olaf Lorbach
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-02-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.