Literature DB >> 22823988

Rebinding: or why drugs may act longer in vivo than expected from their in vitro target residence time.

Georges Vauquelin1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: It is well established that the in vivo duration of drug action not only depends on macroscopic pharmacokinetic properties like its plasma half-life, but also on the residence time of the drug-target complexes. However, drug 'rebinding' (i.e., the consecutive binding of dissociated drug molecules to the original target and/or targets nearby) can be influential in vivo as well. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: Information about rebinding is available since the 1980s but it is dispersed in the life sciences literature. This review compiles this information. In this respect, neurochemists and biopohysicians advance the same equations to describe drug rebinding. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: The rebinding mechanism is explained according to the prevailing viewpoint in different life science disciplines. There is a general consensus that high target densities, high association rates and local phenomena that hinder the diffusion of free drug molecules away from their target all promote rebinding. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Simulations presented here for the first time suggest that rebinding may increase the duration and even the constancy of the drug's clinical action. Intact cell radioligand dissociation and related ex vivo experiments offer useful indications about a drug's aptitude to experience target rebinding.

Year:  2010        PMID: 22823988     DOI: 10.1517/17460441.2010.512037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov        ISSN: 1746-0441            Impact factor:   6.098


  25 in total

Review 1.  The drug-target residence time model: a 10-year retrospective.

Authors:  Robert A Copeland
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Simplified models for heterobivalent ligand binding: when are they applicable and which are the factors that affect their target residence time.

Authors:  Georges Vauquelin
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Pharmacodynamics: Which trails are your drugs taking?

Authors:  Rumin Zhang
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 15.040

4.  Does the Lipid Bilayer Orchestrate Access and Binding of Ligands to Transmembrane Orthosteric/Allosteric Sites of G Protein-Coupled Receptors?

Authors:  Christopher T Szlenk; Jeevan B Gc; Senthil Natesan
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 5.  Link between a high k on for drug binding and a fast clinical action: to be or not to be?

Authors:  Georges Vauquelin
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.597

Review 6.  Exploring avidity: understanding the potential gains in functional affinity and target residence time of bivalent and heterobivalent ligands.

Authors:  Georges Vauquelin; Steven J Charlton
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 8.739

7.  Effects of target binding kinetics on in vivo drug efficacy: koff , kon and rebinding.

Authors:  Georges Vauquelin
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 8.  Cell membranes… and how long drugs may exert beneficial pharmacological activity in vivo.

Authors:  Georges Vauquelin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-05-29       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Distinct in vivo target occupancy by bivalent- and induced-fit-like binding drugs.

Authors:  Georges Vauquelin
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 10.  Perspective: Implications of Ligand-Receptor Binding Kinetics for Therapeutic Targeting of G Protein-Coupled Receptors.

Authors:  Wijnand J C van der Velden; Laura H Heitman; Mette M Rosenkilde
Journal:  ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci       Date:  2020-03-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.