Literature DB >> 2282370

The nature of selective attention effects on auditory event-related potentials.

P T Michie1, H M Bearpark, J M Crawford, L C Glue.   

Abstract

The purpose of the research reported here was to examine a number of issues relating to the nature of selective attention effects on auditory event-related potentials (ERPs), namely, to determine the relative contribution of N1 and slow wave (SW) to the early and late components of Nd respectively, where Nd is defined as the negative shift of attended ERPs relative to unattended ERPs; to examine whether individual differences in Nd morphology are related to performance and the strategies that subjects use; and to determine the contribution of changes in the attended and unattended ERPs to Nd. Auditory ERPs were recorded from subjects as they carried out an auditory selective attention task and a visual target detection task. The auditory selective attention task was a multidimensional task in which stimuli varied on location, pitch and duration and in which the subject's task was to pay attention to a particular location/pitch combination and respond whenever they detected a long-duration target tone. In the visual target detection task, subjects were required to respond whenever they detected a colour change in a light-emitting diode which also acted as a fixation point. Auditory ERPs recorded during the visual task were used to provide a measure of exogenous components uncontaminated by differential effects of selective processing of auditory stimuli. The results suggested that early Nd and N1 are independently generated as Nd did not exhibit the contralateral scalp focus typical of N1, and that late Nd is independent of SW. While substantial differences in Nd morphology were observed over subjects, these differences showed no consistent relationships to performance or to task strategies. Comparison of auditory ERPs during active auditory attention with auditory ERPs recorded during the visual control task indicated that there was an early negative shift of the attended ERP, a later negative shift of the attended ERP which had a frontal focus and a later positive shift of the unattended ERP. These results suggest that there are active processes involved in the processing of stimuli from both the attended and unattended source.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2282370     DOI: 10.1016/0301-0511(90)90141-i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  12 in total

1.  Impaired Facilitatory Mechanisms of Auditory Attention After Damage of the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; Kelly G Buchanan; Humsini Viswanath; Jessica Black; Donatella Scabini; Frédérique Bonnet-Brilhault; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Load effects in auditory selective attention: evidence for distinct facilitation and inhibition mechanisms.

Authors:  Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; Constanze Mikyska; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Event-related potentials during a selective attention task with short interstimulus intervals in patients with schizophrenia.

Authors:  A Iwanami; H Isono; Y Okajima; Y Noda; K Kamijima
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 6.186

4.  Neural dynamics of attending and ignoring in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Maria Chait; Alain de Cheveigné; David Poeppel; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Effects of selective attention on the electrophysiological representation of concurrent sounds in the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Aurélie Bidet-Caulet; Catherine Fischer; Julien Besle; Pierre-Emmanuel Aguera; Marie-Helene Giard; Olivier Bertrand
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Neural tracking of the speech envelope is differentially modulated by attention and language experience.

Authors:  Rachel Reetzke; G Nike Gnanateja; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Interaction between attention and bottom-up saliency mediates the representation of foreground and background in an auditory scene.

Authors:  Mounya Elhilali; Juanjuan Xiang; Shihab A Shamma; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Human decision making based on variations in internal noise: an EEG study.

Authors:  Sygal Amitay; Jeanne Guiraud; Ediz Sohoglu; Oliver Zobay; Barrie A Edmonds; Yu-Xuan Zhang; David R Moore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Attention effects on the processing of task-relevant and task-irrelevant speech sounds and letters.

Authors:  Maria Mittag; Karina Inauri; Tatu Huovilainen; Miika Leminen; Emma Salo; Teemu Rinne; Teija Kujala; Kimmo Alho
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Rejection positivity predicts trial-to-trial reaction times in an auditory selective attention task: a computational analysis of inhibitory control.

Authors:  Sufen Chen; Robert D Melara
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.