| Literature DB >> 22823504 |
Anne R Johnston1, Nicola M Anthony.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Duikers in the subfamily Cephalophinae are a group of tropical forest mammals believed to have first originated during the late Miocene. However, knowledge of phylogenetic relationships, pattern and timing of their subsequent radiation is poorly understood. Here we present the first multi-locus phylogeny of this threatened group of tropical artiodactyls and use a Bayesian uncorrelated molecular clock to estimate divergence times.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22823504 PMCID: PMC3523051 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-120
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Sequence variability
| MGF | 759 | 696 (617–727) | 137 (18) | 64 (8) | 0.85, 0.871 | HKY + G |
| PKRCl | 552 | 535 (469–548) | 88 (16) | 54 (10) | 0.892, 0.884 | HKY + G |
| SPTBN1 | 894 | 843 (508–871) | 130 (15) | 64 (7) | 0.873, 0.912 | HKY + I |
| THY | 775 | 694 (372–770) | 104 (13) | 46 (6) | 0.891, 0.912 | HKY + G |
| Mitochondrial | 1172 | 1117 (514–1172) | 447 (38) | 368 (31) | 0.417, 0.621 | HKY + G + I |
| Nuclear | 2980 | 2770 (2158–2895) | 459 (15) | 208 (7) | 0.823, 0.846 | HKY + G |
Patterns of sequence variability among individual mitochondrial and nuclear markers, combined mitochondrial genes, combined nuclear loci, and combined mitochondrial and nuclear loci. These data comprise the number and percentage of variable sites, the number and percentage of parsimony informative characters (PIC), the consistency (CI) and retention (RI) indices, and the suggested model of nucleotide substitution, as selected under the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). GTR, HKY, G and I represent the General Time Reversible model, the Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano model, the alpha shape parameter describing gamma distributed rate variation, and a proportion of invariant sites, respectively.
Figure 1MGF gene genealogy. Majority-rule consensus tree showing the Bayesian estimate of nuclear gene trees for MGF. Thickened branches indicate nodal support by both BA posterior probability (PP) values ≥ 0.95 and ML bootstrap support (BS) ≥ 75. Additional file 1: Table S1 lists support values by node for this phylogeny.
Figure 2PRKCl gene genealogy. Majority-rule consensus tree showing the Bayesian estimate of nuclear gene trees for PRKCl. Thickened branches indicate nodal support by both BA posterior probability (PP) values ≥ 0.95 and ML bootstrap support (BS) ≥ 75. Additional file 1: Table S1 lists support values by node for this phylogeny.
Figure 3SPTBN gene genealogy. Majority-rule consensus tree showing the Bayesian estimate of nuclear gene trees for SPTBN. Thickened branches indicate nodal support by both BA posterior probability (PP) values ≥ 0.95 and ML bootstrap support (BS) ≥ 75. Additional file 1: Table S1 lists support values by node for this phylogeny.
Figure 4THY gene genealogy. Majority-rule consensus tree showing the Bayesian estimate of nuclear gene trees for THY. Thickened branches indicate nodal support by both BA posterior probability (PP) values ≥ 0.95 and ML bootstrap support (BS) ≥ 75. Additional file 1: Table S1 lists support values by node for this phylogeny.
Figure 5Mitochondrial gene genealogy. Majority-rule consensus tree showing the Bayesian estimate of the complete mitochondrial dataset. Thickened branches indicate nodal support by both BA posterior probability (PP) values ≥ 0.95 and ML bootstrap support (BS) ≥ 75. Additional file 1: Table S1 lists support values by node for this phylogeny.
Figure 6Combined nuclear tree. Majority-rule consensus cladogram showing the Bayesian estimate of the species tree from nuclear concatenated (left) and mitochondrial datasets. Thickened branches nodal indicate support by both BA posterior probability (PP) values ≥ 0.95 and ML bootstrap support (BS) ≥ 75. Additional file 1: Table S1 lists support values by node for this phylogeny. Boxes show major lineages on a grey scale, starting with the giant duikers in white, then the savannah duiker, the east African red duikers, the west African red duikers, and the dwarf duikers in darkest grey.
Figure 7Species tree. Chronogram illustrating species relationships and divergence times based on Bayesian analysis of the total evidence (i.e. concatenated mitochondrial and nuclear DNA). Node numbers refer to divergence time estimations given in Table 2. Thickened branches indicate nodal support by both BA posterior probability (PP) values ≥ 0.95 and ML bootstrap support (BS) ≥ 75. Additional file 1: Table S1 lists support values by node for this phylogeny.
Divergence times
| 1 | Origin of branch leading to Tragelaphini | 17.87 [13.29-22.58] | 18.11 [13.79-22.47] |
| 2 | Origin of branch leading to | 15.92 [11.38-20.22] | 13.35 [9.27-18.15] |
| 3 | Origin of branch leading to | 13.73 [9.91-17.72] | |
| 4 | Origin of branch leading to | 13.01 [9.25-16.75] | |
| 5 | 8.73 [6.27-11.43] | 7.55 [8.49-17.07] | |
| 6 | Giant and savanna/East and west African red duiker lineages diverge | 7.03 [5.02-9.19] | |
| 7 | Origin of branch leading to | 6.59 [4.59-8.55] | 4.22 [2.50-6.59] |
| 8 | Origin of branch leading to | 6.20 [4.37-8.15] | 5.25 [4.15-8.66] |
| 9 | Giant/savanna duiker lineages diverge | 5.87 [4.16-7.78] | |
| 10 | East/west African red duiker lineages diverge | 4.98 [3.58-6.69] | 3.53 [2.19-5.29] |
| 11 | 3.93 [2.68-5.31] | 3.03 [1.70-4.75] | |
| 12 | Origin of branch leading to C. niger | 3.70 [2.52-4.97] | 2.69 [1.59-4.18] |
| 13 | 3.67 [2.53-4.93] | | |
| 14 | 3.25 [2.15-4.47] | 1.91 [0.80-3.44] | |
| 15 | Origin of branch leading to | 3.16 [2.13-4.27] | 1.43 [0.58-2.48] |
| 16 | 2.60 [1.74-3.54] | 1.63 [0.75-2.80] | |
| 17 | 1.72 [1.18-2.38] | | |
| 18 | 0.87 [0.51-1.26] | | |
| 19 | 1.31 [0.80-1.91] | 0.98 [0.19-1.29] | |
| 20 | 0.48 [0.25-0.78] | 0.49 [0.29-1.52] | |
| 21 | 0.30 [0.74-1.74] | 1.03 [0.47-1.82] |
Divergence times estimated by BEAST based on either total evidence (mitochondrial and nuclear) or nuclear only datasets. Divergence time estimates are the median age of the posterior distributions in million years of age and the 95% highest posterior density (HPD) intervals are indicated in brackets. Label numbers refer to the topology of Figure 4.