Literature DB >> 22823412

Towards bloodless cystectomy: a 10-year experience of intra-operative cell salvage during radical cystectomy.

Jonathan Aning1, Jamie Dunn, Mark Daugherty, Robert Mason, Richard Pocock, Biddy Ridler, John Thompson, John S McGrath.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Study Type - Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Guidance from the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) on the use of intraoperative cell savage (ICS) has been in place for over 3 years and recommends its routine usage in all patients undergoing radical pelvic urological surgery. The current series describes the contribution of ICS to contemporary blood conservation strategies and the goal of 'bloodless' cystectomy.
OBJECTIVE: •  To describe a 10-year experience of intra-operative cell salvage (ICS) during radical cystectomy at a regional cancer centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: •  Between 1(st) January 2001 and 31(st) December 2010, 213 consecutive patients underwent radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for bladder cancer, with an ICS suction device used in theatre. •  Surgery was performed by one of three consultant surgeons using an open technique with lymph node clearance to the iliac bifurcation. Orthotopic bladder substitution was performed in 25% of patients overall. •  ICS data were collected prospectively on an electronic database and the institutional database was then cross-referenced with a complete review of patients' medical records, laboratory results and radiological investigations retrospectively. •  Data collected included patient demographics, haemoglobin levels before and after surgery, the volume of ICS blood collected and re-infused, complications related to ICS usage, the volume of allogeneic red blood cells (RBCs) transfused, length of stay and overall patient survival at 3 and 5 years after surgery.
RESULTS: •  In all 213 cases described, ICS was used without complication, with no recorded episodes of device failure and no complications related to the use of cell salvage. •  Overall, 91% of patients received ICS blood and 28% of patients avoided any further transfusion products. •  The median (range) follow-up for the cohort was 24 (9-119) months. •  Seventy percent of the transfusion requirement for patients who underwent surgery in 2001 was met using allogeneic RBC transfusion but by 2010, as blood loss markedly reduced, ICS blood was able to provide ∼70% of overall transfusion requirements. As a consequence, the percentage of patients avoiding an allogeneic RBC transfusion significantly increased during the 10-year period, such that 70% of patients avoided allogeneic RBC transfusion in 2010 compared with only 10-20% in the period 2001-2003 •  The overall survival rate at 3 and 5 years was 58% and 49%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: •  In conclusion, the use of ICS during radical cystectomy is safe; it is capable of meeting the majority of or, in some cases, the total blood product requirement for individual patients. As a result, it decreases the need for allogeneic RBC transfusion and hence the associated risks. Current follow-up shows no apparent risk of decreased long-term survival from an oncological perspective. •  The authors advocate routine availability of ICS for all major urological oncology cases.
© 2012 BJU INTERNATIONAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22823412     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11338.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  8 in total

Review 1.  Controversy over the use of intraoperative blood salvage autotransfusion during liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Bo Zhai; Xue-Ying Sun
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Enhanced recovery programmes for patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Julian Smith; Raj S Pruthi; John McGrath
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  The use of intraoperative cell salvage in urologic oncology.

Authors:  Matthew C Ferroni; Andres F Correa; Timothy D Lyon; Benjamin J Davies; Michael C Ost
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2017

4.  High-sensitivity to heparin associates with cell salvage transfusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patient undergoing posterior spinal fusion.

Authors:  Li Du; Jianqiao Zheng; Yumin Tang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-08-15

5.  Safety of Intraoperative Cell Salvage in Cancer Surgery: An Updated Meta-Analysis of the Current Literature.

Authors:  Thomas Frietsch; Andrea U Steinbicker; Audrey Horn; Matthes Metz; Gerald Dietrich; Markus A Weigand; Jonathan H Waters; Dania Fischer
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.040

Review 6.  The Preoperative Assessment and Optimization of Patients Undergoing Major Urological Surgery.

Authors:  Helen W Cui; Benjamin W Turney; John Griffiths
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  CTCs detection from intraoperative salvaged blood in RCC-IVC thrombus patients by negative enrichment and iFISH identification: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Zhang; Xiangyang Guo; Yanan Zong; Chuanya Xu; Jilian Wang; Bin Zhang; Chang Liu; Yueqing Gong; Lixiang Xue; Lulin Ma; Shudong Zhang; Yi Li; Hong Zeng
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  Coagulopathy associated with cell salvage transfusion following cerebrovascular surgery.

Authors:  Jianqiao Zheng; Li Du; Guizhi Du; Bin Liu
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.088

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.