Literature DB >> 22822912

When analoging is not enough: scaffold discovery in medicinal chemistry.

Hongyu Zhao1, Irini Akritopoulou-Zanze.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: As an integral part of lead generation and optimization, scaffold discovery has broad implications in drug discovery. Currently available chemical scaffolds might be inadequate to provide drug-like ligands for new targets such as phosphatases and protein-protein interactions and therapeutically useful chemical space needs to be continuously explored. New scaffolds are often desired to overcome major hurdles (e.g., potency plateau, selectivity, pharmacokinetics, etc.) in lead generation and optimization. Timely discovery of proof-of-concept compounds facilitates target validation, diversifies clinical candidates and improves the overall success rate of drug discovery. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: This analysis discusses the strategies involved in finding new scaffolds (i.e., fragment-, ligand- and structure-based design) and their applications (e.g., improve potency/selectivity, multiple ligand design, protein-protein interactions, etc.) in drug discovery. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: The readers will learn the strategies involved in scaffold design and the problems that they solve. They will also gain the understanding of the circumstances suitable for using scaffold design. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Scaffold is defined by the authors as a biological target dependent concept. Therapeutically useful scaffolds are limited and the identification of new scaffolds is sometimes required to overcome major optimization hurdles. However, depending on the promiscuity of the binding pocket of the target and the validity of the optimization protocol, finding better scaffolds can be a challenging task. Several strategies in scaffold discovery have emerged or matured owing to recent trends such as pursuit of targets from new proteomic families, lack of validated targets, advances in synthesis and biological assays and adoption of in vitro activity-driven screening paradigms.

Year:  2010        PMID: 22822912     DOI: 10.1517/17460440903584874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov        ISSN: 1746-0441            Impact factor:   6.098


  5 in total

Review 1.  Chemistry and biology of multicomponent reactions.

Authors:  Alexander Dömling; Wei Wang; Kan Wang
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Medicinal chemistry for 2020.

Authors:  Seetharama D Satyanarayanajois; Ronald A Hill
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.808

Review 3.  Engineered biological entities for drug delivery and gene therapy protein nanoparticles.

Authors:  Joan Domingo-Espín; Ugutz Unzueta; Paolo Saccardo; Escarlata Rodríguez-Carmona; José Luís Corchero; Esther Vázquez; Neus Ferrer-Miralles
Journal:  Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.622

Review 4.  Spirocyclic Motifs in Natural Products.

Authors:  Evgeny Chupakhin; Olga Babich; Alexander Prosekov; Lyudmila Asyakina; Mikhail Krasavin
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-11-17       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 5.  Heterocycle-Based Multicomponent Reactions in Drug Discovery: From Hit Finding to Rational Design.

Authors:  Pau Nadal Rodríguez; Ouldouz Ghashghaei; Andrea Bagán; Carmen Escolano; Rodolfo Lavilla
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-06-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.