Literature DB >> 22821994

The congenital bicuspid aortic valve can experience high-frequency unsteady shear stresses on its leaflet surface.

Choon Hwai Yap1, Neelakantan Saikrishnan, Gowthami Tamilselvan, Nikolai Vasilyev, Ajit P Yoganathan.   

Abstract

The bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a common congenital malformation of the aortic valve (AV) affecting 1% to 2% of the population. The BAV is predisposed to early degenerative calcification of valve leaflets, and BAV patients constitute 50% of AV stenosis patients. Although evidence shows that genetic defects can play a role in calcification of the BAV leaflets, we hypothesize that drastic changes in the mechanical environment of the BAV elicit pathological responses from the valve and might be concurrently responsible for early calcification. An in vitro model of the BAV was constructed by surgically manipulating a native trileaflet porcine AV. The BAV valve model and a trileaflet AV (TAV) model were tested in an in vitro pulsatile flow loop mimicking physiological hemodynamics. Laser Doppler velocimetry was used to make measurements of fluid shear stresses on the leaflet of the valve models using previously established methodologies. Furthermore, particle image velocimetry was used to visualize the flow fields downstream of the valves and in the sinuses. In the BAV model, flow near the leaflets and fluid shear stresses on the leaflets were much more unsteady than for the TAV model, most likely due to the moderate stenosis in the BAV and the skewed forward flow jet that collided with the aorta wall. This additional unsteadiness occurred during mid- to late-systole and was composed of cycle-to-cycle magnitude variability as well as high-frequency fluctuations about the mean shear stress. It has been demonstrated that the BAV geometry can lead to unsteady shear stresses under physiological flow and pressure conditions. Such altered shear stresses could play a role in accelerated calcification in BAVs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22821994      PMCID: PMC3468455          DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00829.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  45 in total

1.  Direction and magnitude of blood flow shear stresses on the leaflets of aortic valves: is there a link with valve calcification?

Authors:  Liang Ge; Fotis Sotiropoulos
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Diet-induced aortic valve disease in mice haploinsufficient for the Notch pathway effector RBPJK/CSL.

Authors:  Meritxell Nus; Donal MacGrogan; Beatriz Martínez-Poveda; Yolanda Benito; Jesús C Casanova; Francisco Fernández-Avilés; Javier Bermejo; José Luis de la Pompa
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 8.311

3.  Experimental technique of measuring dynamic fluid shear stress on the aortic surface of the aortic valve leaflet.

Authors:  Choon Hwai Yap; Neelakantan Saikrishnan; Gowthami Tamilselvan; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 4.  Calcific aortic valve stenosis: methods, models, and mechanisms.

Authors:  Jordan D Miller; Robert M Weiss; Donald D Heistad
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Discovery of shear- and side-specific mRNAs and miRNAs in human aortic valvular endothelial cells.

Authors:  Casey J Holliday; Randall F Ankeny; Hanjoong Jo; Robert M Nerem
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.733

6.  Experimental measurement of dynamic fluid shear stress on the aortic surface of the aortic valve leaflet.

Authors:  Choon Hwai Yap; Neelakantan Saikrishnan; Gowthami Tamilselvan; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2011-03-18

7.  Dynamic hemodynamic energy loss in normal and stenosed aortic valves.

Authors:  Choon-Hwai Yap; Lakshmi P Dasi; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Notch1 represses osteogenic pathways in aortic valve cells.

Authors:  Vishal Nigam; Deepak Srivastava
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 5.000

9.  Elevated cyclic stretch alters matrix remodeling in aortic valve cusps: implications for degenerative aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Kartik Balachandran; Philippe Sucosky; Hanjoong Jo; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 4.733

10.  Hemodynamic environments from opposing sides of human aortic valve leaflets evoke distinct endothelial phenotypes in vitro.

Authors:  Eli J Weinberg; Peter J Mack; Frederick J Schoen; Guillermo García-Cardeña; Mohammad R Kaazempur Mofrad
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng       Date:  2010-03
View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Fibrocalcific aortic valve disease: opportunity to understand disease mechanisms using mouse models.

Authors:  Robert M Weiss; Jordan D Miller; Donald D Heistad
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  Fully coupled fluid-structure interaction model of congenital bicuspid aortic valves: effect of asymmetry on hemodynamics.

Authors:  Gil Marom; Hee-Sun Kim; Moshe Rosenfeld; Ehud Raanani; Rami Haj-Ali
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-03-10       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Effect of hinge gap width of a St. Jude medical bileaflet mechanical heart valve on blood damage potential--an in vitro micro particle image velocimetry study.

Authors:  Brian H Jun; Neelakantan Saikrishnan; Sivakkumar Arjunon; B Min Yun; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Bone morphogenetic protein-4 and transforming growth factor-beta1 mechanisms in acute valvular response to supra-physiologic hemodynamic stresses.

Authors:  Ling Sun; Philippe Sucosky
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-26

Review 5.  Review of molecular and mechanical interactions in the aortic valve and aorta: implications for the shared pathogenesis of aortic valve disease and aortopathy.

Authors:  Varun K Krishnamurthy; Richard C Godby; G R Liu; J Michael Smith; Loren F Hiratzka; Daria A Narmoneva; Robert B Hinton
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Bicuspid aortic valves experience increased strain as compared to tricuspid aortic valves.

Authors:  Kai Szeto; Peter Pastuszko; Juan C del Álamo; Juan Lasheras; Vishal Nigam
Journal:  World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg       Date:  2013-10

Review 7.  Aortic valve: mechanical environment and mechanobiology.

Authors:  Sivakkumar Arjunon; Swetha Rathan; Hanjoong Jo; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Two MicroRNAs, miR-34a and miR-125a, Are Implicated in Bicuspid Aortopathy by Modulating Metalloproteinase 2.

Authors:  Yuntao Lu; Lingfei Zhang; Hongyue Tao; Xiaotian Sun; Yun Zhao; Limin Xia; Xiaoning Sun; Jinqiang Shen; Jiahui Fu; Mohammad Rafi Hamidi; Huan Liu; Wenshuo Wang; Mofang Liu; Lai Wei
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 1.890

9.  Patient-Specific Bicuspid Aortic Valve Biomechanics: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Integrated Fluid-Structure Interaction Approach.

Authors:  Monica Emendi; Francesco Sturla; Ram P Ghosh; Matteo Bianchi; Filippo Piatti; Francesca R Pluchinotta; Daniel Giese; Massimo Lombardi; Alberto Redaelli; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 10.  Heart Valve Biomechanics: The Frontiers of Modeling Modalities and the Expansive Capabilities of Ex Vivo Heart Simulation.

Authors:  Matthew H Park; Yuanjia Zhu; Annabel M Imbrie-Moore; Hanjay Wang; Mateo Marin-Cuartas; Michael J Paulsen; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.