BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: CSM is a common neurologic disease that results in progressive disability and eventual paralysis without appropriate treatment. Imaging plays a significant role in the evaluation of CSM and has evolved with recent technical advances. We sought to systematically explore the relationship between clinical disease severity and DTI in CSM, and to investigate the potential use of DTI in surgical decision-making models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR imaging studies and clinical assessments were prospectively collected on 30 patients with CSM. Spearman correlations were used to investigate associations between clinical disease severity and FA at the time of diagnosis. Clinical assessment was performed using mJOA, Nurick, Short Form-36, and NDI scores. Fifteen patients with CSM subsequently underwent decompressive surgery; Spearman correlation and logistic regression were applied to this cohort to study the relationship between baseline DTI measurements and postoperative outcome. Conventional imaging (spinal cord T2 signal intensity and degree of stenosis) was evaluated for comparison with DTI. RESULTS: At diagnosis, FA demonstrated a strong correlation with baseline mJOA (r = 0.62, P < .01) and Nurick (r = -0.46, P = .01) scores. After surgery, recovery of function demonstrated by improvement in NDI score was associated with higher FA values on preoperative DTI (r = -0.61, P = .04). Severely affected patients with CSM with disproportionately high FA tended to achieve greater mJOA scores after surgery compared with subjects with lower FA (P = .08). T2 signal intensity was associated with functional status at baseline but did not predict postoperative outcome; degree of stenosis lacked any significant correlation with clinical parameters. CONCLUSIONS: DTI may be a useful diagnostic tool for assessing disease severity in CSM. The predictive value of DTI regarding postoperative outcome may improve surgical decision-making and facilitate health care outcomes research.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: CSM is a common neurologic disease that results in progressive disability and eventual paralysis without appropriate treatment. Imaging plays a significant role in the evaluation of CSM and has evolved with recent technical advances. We sought to systematically explore the relationship between clinical disease severity and DTI in CSM, and to investigate the potential use of DTI in surgical decision-making models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR imaging studies and clinical assessments were prospectively collected on 30 patients with CSM. Spearman correlations were used to investigate associations between clinical disease severity and FA at the time of diagnosis. Clinical assessment was performed using mJOA, Nurick, Short Form-36, and NDI scores. Fifteen patients with CSM subsequently underwent decompressive surgery; Spearman correlation and logistic regression were applied to this cohort to study the relationship between baseline DTI measurements and postoperative outcome. Conventional imaging (spinal cord T2 signal intensity and degree of stenosis) was evaluated for comparison with DTI. RESULTS: At diagnosis, FA demonstrated a strong correlation with baseline mJOA (r = 0.62, P < .01) and Nurick (r = -0.46, P = .01) scores. After surgery, recovery of function demonstrated by improvement in NDI score was associated with higher FA values on preoperative DTI (r = -0.61, P = .04). Severely affected patients with CSM with disproportionately high FA tended to achieve greater mJOA scores after surgery compared with subjects with lower FA (P = .08). T2 signal intensity was associated with functional status at baseline but did not predict postoperative outcome; degree of stenosis lacked any significant correlation with clinical parameters. CONCLUSIONS: DTI may be a useful diagnostic tool for assessing disease severity in CSM. The predictive value of DTI regarding postoperative outcome may improve surgical decision-making and facilitate health care outcomes research.
Authors: Yusuhn Kang; Joon Woo Lee; Young Hwan Koh; Saebeom Hur; Su Jin Kim; Jee Won Chai; Heung Sik Kang Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Saurabh Guleria; Rakesh K Gupta; Sona Saksena; Anil Chandra; R N Srivastava; Mazhar Husain; Ramkishore Rathore; Ponnada A Narayana Journal: J Neurosci Res Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Aditya Vedantam; Ping Hou; T Linda Chi; Patrick M Dougherty; Kenneth R Hess; Ashwin Viswanathan Journal: Stereotact Funct Neurosurg Date: 2017-01-14 Impact factor: 1.875
Authors: Tomasz Tykocki; Philip English; David Minks; Arunkumar Krishnakumar; Guy Wynne-Jones Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2018-09-19 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: A R Martin; B De Leener; J Cohen-Adad; D W Cadotte; S Kalsi-Ryan; S F Lange; L Tetreault; A Nouri; A Crawley; D J Mikulis; H Ginsberg; M G Fehlings Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-04-20 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Rory K J Murphy; Peng Sun; Junqian Xu; Yong Wang; Samir Sullivan; Paul Gamble; Joanne Wagner; Neill N Wright; Ian G Dorward; Daniel Riew; Paul Santiago; Michael P Kelly; Kathryn Trinkaus; Wilson Z Ray; Sheng-Kwei Song Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 3.468