Literature DB >> 22819578

Impact of prosthetic design on clinical and radiologic outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective study.

Helen Razmjou1, Richard Holtby, Monique Christakis, Terry Axelrod, Robin Richards.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This prospective longitudinal study compared clinical and radiologic outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) using 3 different prosthetic designs, the Neer II system, the Bigliani-Flatow (BF), and a stemless prosthesis, the Total Evolutive Shoulder System (TESS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint who underwent TSA were followed up for 2 years. Four patient-oriented disability outcomes were used. The clinical data collected before surgery and at follow-up assessments during a 2-year period included active range of motion (ROM) in 6 directions and strength. Radiographic signs of glenoid and humeral component loosening were recorded. The incidence of humeral head subluxation was documented.
RESULTS: Seventy-four patients completed the study. There was a significant improvement in the 4 disability measures, ROM, and strength at 2 years in all 3 groups (P < .0001). Active external rotation at 90° abduction was statistically significantly lower in the Neer II group (P = .001). The incidence of lucent lines around the glenoid component was higher in the Neer II group (P = .0002). No statistically significant relationship was seen between type of prosthesis and patient satisfaction (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The 3 types of TSA prostheses used in this study all provided significant improvement in pain and function and were associated with high patient satisfaction. The Neer II was associated with less active external rotation and more lucent lines.
Copyright © 2013 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22819578     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  22 in total

1.  Total shoulder arthroplasty: are the humeral components getting shorter?

Authors:  Luke Harmer; Thomas Throckmorton; John W Sperling
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

2.  Stemless shoulder arthroplasty: a literature review.

Authors:  Dario Petriccioli; Celeste Bertone; Giacomo Marchi
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-06-08

3.  Short to mid-term results of stemless reverse shoulder arthroplasty in a selected patient population compared to a matched control group with stem.

Authors:  Philipp Moroder; Lukas Ernstbrunner; Christine Zweiger; Maximilian Schatz; Gerd Seitlinger; Robert Skursky; Johannes Becker; Herbert Resch; Rolf Michael Krifter
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Use of scoring systems for assessing and reporting the outcome results from shoulder surgery and arthroplasty.

Authors:  Simon Booker; Nawaf Alfahad; Martin Scott; Ben Gooding; W Angus Wallace
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-03-18

5.  Neuropathic Pain after Shoulder Arthroplasty: Prevalence, Impact on Physical and Mental Function, and Demographic Determinants.

Authors:  Helen Razmjou; Linda J Woodhouse; Richard Holtby
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 1.037

6.  Porous metals and alternate bearing surfaces in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shannon R Carpenter; Ivan Urits; Anand M Murthi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

7.  Conversion of stemmed hemi- or total to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: advantages of a modular stem design.

Authors:  Karl Wieser; Paul Borbas; Eugene T Ek; Dominik C Meyer; Christian Gerber
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Mid-term results of a stemless ceramic on polyethylene shoulder prosthesis - A prospective multicentre study.

Authors:  R W Jordan; C P Kelly; G Pap; T Joudet; R W Nyffeler; F Reuther; U Irlenbusch
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-08-14

9.  Are there differences between stemless and conventional stemmed shoulder prostheses in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Michael W Maier; Sarah Lauer; Matthias C Klotz; Matthias Bülhoff; David Spranz; Felix Zeifang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 10.  Anatomic stemless shoulder arthroplasty and related outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nael Hawi; Mark Tauber; Michael Joseph Messina; Peter Habermeyer; Frank Martetschläger
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.