Literature DB >> 22819403

Content and construct validation of a robotic surgery curriculum using an electromagnetic instrument tracker.

Timothy J Tausch1, Timothy M Kowalewski, Lee W White, Patrick S McDonough, Timothy C Brand, Thomas S Lendvay.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Rapid adoption of robot-assisted surgery has outpaced our ability to train novice roboticists. Objective metrics are required to adequately assess robotic surgical skills and yet surrogates for proficiency, such as economy of motion and tool path metrics, are not readily accessible directly from the da Vinci® robot system. The trakSTAR™ Tool Tip Tracker is a widely available, cost-effective electromagnetic position sensing mechanism by which objective proficiency metrics can be quantified. We validated a robotic surgery curriculum using the trakSTAR device to objectively capture robotic task proficiency metrics.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Through an institutional review board approved study 10 subjects were recruited from 2 surgical experience groups (novice and experienced). All subjects completed 3 technical skills modules, including block transfer, intracorporeal suturing/knot tying (fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery) and ring tower transfer, using the da Vinci robot with the trakSTAR device affixed to the robotic instruments. Recorded objective metrics included task time and path length, which were used to calculate economy of motion. Student t test statistics were performed using STATA®.
RESULTS: The novice and experienced groups consisted of 5 subjects each. The experienced group outperformed the novice group in all 3 tasks. Experienced surgeons described the simulator platform as useful for training and agreed with incorporating it into a residency curriculum.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic surgery curricula can be validated by an off-the-shelf instrument tracking system. This platform allows surgical educators to objectively assess trainees and may provide credentialing offices with a means of objectively assessing any surgical staff member seeking robotic surgery privileges at an institution.
Copyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22819403     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  12 in total

1.  Construct validity of nine new inanimate exercises for robotic surgeon training using a standardized setup.

Authors:  Anthony M Jarc; Myriam Curet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Assessment of Robotic Console Skills (ARCS): construct validity of a novel global rating scale for technical skills in robotically assisted surgery.

Authors:  May Liu; Shreya Purohit; Joshua Mazanetz; Whitney Allen; Usha S Kreaden; Myriam Curet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Development and evaluation of rhinoplasty spreader graft suture simulator for novice surgeons.

Authors:  Connie J Oh; Prem B Tripathi; Jeffrey T Gu; Pamela Borden; Brian J-F Wong
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  "Alarm-corrected" ergonomic armrest use could improve learning curves of novices on robotic simulator.

Authors:  Kun Yang; Manuela Perez; Gabriela Hossu; Nicolas Hubert; Cyril Perrenot; Jacques Hubert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Using virtual reality to maintain surgical skills during periods of robotic surgery inactivity.

Authors:  Loredana M Guseila; Archana Saranathan; Eric L Jenison; Karen M Gil; John J Elias
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-04-29

6.  Development and Validation of Objective Performance Metrics for Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Andrew J Hung; Jian Chen; Anthony Jarc; David Hatcher; Hooman Djaladat; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Virtual reality robotic surgery warm-up improves task performance in a dry laboratory environment: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Thomas S Lendvay; Timothy C Brand; Lee White; Timothy Kowalewski; Saikiran Jonnadula; Laina D Mercer; Derek Khorsand; Justin Andros; Blake Hannaford; Richard M Satava
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Uncontrolled manifold analysis of arm joint angle variability during robotic teleoperation and freehand movement of surgeons and novices.

Authors:  Ilana Nisky; Michael H Hsieh; Allison M Okamura
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Effects of robotic manipulators on movements of novices and surgeons.

Authors:  Ilana Nisky; Allison M Okamura; Michael H Hsieh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Validity of robotic simulation for high-stakes examination: a pilot study.

Authors:  Adrienne Jarocki; David Rice; Michael Kent; Daniel Oh; Jules Lin; Rishindra M Reddy
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-05-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.