OBJECTIVES: Besides survival time quality of life (QoL) is the most important criterion for measuring the success of the therapy and rehabilitation of patients with carcinoma of the oral cavity. Interestingly, assessments by doctors sometimes differ from those of patients concerning QoL and level of information. Particularly the probability of cancer recurrence is unclear for many patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fear of recurrence (FOR) data were gathered from a total collective of 1761 patients from 38 hospitals within the German-language area of Germany, Austria and Switzerland (DÖSAK-REHAB-STUDIE) yielding 1652 patient questionnaires containing 147 items which were evaluated. They refer to periods at least 6 months after therapy. QoL was determined by the patient and ranges from 0% to 100% and FOR was measured using a Likert scale. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 19.0. RESULTS: FOR affected 80% of the patients to a varying degree and influenced QoL very significantly. Patients with a high level of FOR were also more mentally instable. Their functional impairment in particular contributed to a reduced QoL. They felt less informed by their doctors about their illness and rehabilitation. The medical parameters had a smaller influence on FOR and QoL. CONCLUSION: The patients' knowledge of their medical situation must be improved to make patient assessment of QoL more realistic, particularly when patients with good prospects indicate low QoL. The patients' subjective evaluations have to be more strongly integrated into the concept of the multi-disciplinary team in establishing a comprehensive therapy and rehabilitation plan.
OBJECTIVES: Besides survival time quality of life (QoL) is the most important criterion for measuring the success of the therapy and rehabilitation of patients with carcinoma of the oral cavity. Interestingly, assessments by doctors sometimes differ from those of patients concerning QoL and level of information. Particularly the probability of cancer recurrence is unclear for many patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fear of recurrence (FOR) data were gathered from a total collective of 1761 patients from 38 hospitals within the German-language area of Germany, Austria and Switzerland (DÖSAK-REHAB-STUDIE) yielding 1652 patient questionnaires containing 147 items which were evaluated. They refer to periods at least 6 months after therapy. QoL was determined by the patient and ranges from 0% to 100% and FOR was measured using a Likert scale. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 19.0. RESULTS: FOR affected 80% of the patients to a varying degree and influenced QoL very significantly. Patients with a high level of FOR were also more mentally instable. Their functional impairment in particular contributed to a reduced QoL. They felt less informed by their doctors about their illness and rehabilitation. The medical parameters had a smaller influence on FOR and QoL. CONCLUSION: The patients' knowledge of their medical situation must be improved to make patient assessment of QoL more realistic, particularly when patients with good prospects indicate low QoL. The patients' subjective evaluations have to be more strongly integrated into the concept of the multi-disciplinary team in establishing a comprehensive therapy and rehabilitation plan.
Authors: Elena Álvaro Sanz; Jimena Abilés; Margarita Garrido Siles; Elísabeth Pérez Ruíz; Julia Alcaide García; Antonio Rueda Domínguez Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-05-18 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Rocío Barrios; Manuel Bravo; Jose Antonio Gil-Montoya; Ildefonso Martínez-Lara; Blas García-Medina; Georgios Tsakos Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2015-01-23 Impact factor: 3.186