Elena Álvaro Sanz1, Jimena Abilés1, Margarita Garrido Siles2, Elísabeth Pérez Ruíz3, Julia Alcaide García3, Antonio Rueda Domínguez4. 1. Área de Farmacia y Nutrición, Hospital Costa del Sol, Agencia Sanitaria Costa del Sol, A7, km. 187, 29603, Marbella, Málaga, Spain. 2. Área de Farmacia y Nutrición, Hospital Costa del Sol, Agencia Sanitaria Costa del Sol, A7, km. 187, 29603, Marbella, Málaga, Spain. garridosiles.marga@gmail.com. 3. Oncology service, Hospital Costa del Sol, A7, km 187, 29603, Marbella, Málaga, Spain. 4. UGCI Oncología Médica, Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria, IBIMA, P° Limonar, 2, Bq3, 5°A, Málaga, Spain.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Among the prognostic factors relevant to the condition of oncological patients, nutritional status (NS) has the greatest single impact on quality of life (QL). The goals of our study were to evaluate the influence of NS, weight loss (WL), and the presence of cachexia, prior to the initiation of chemotherapy, on the patient's QL. METHODS: Adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) diagnosed with solid tumours for whom chemotherapy was started between April 2016 and June 2017 were eligible for inclusion in the study. They were asked to complete a QL questionnaire (Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment (FACT-G)) at the beginning. The presence or absence of cachexia was evaluated at the outset, following the definition proposed by Fearon and nutritional assessment by the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) scale. RESULTS: A total of 177 patients completed the FACT-G, the 60% receiving curative therapy. At the start of the treatment, 58.2% of patients had experienced WL, with an average of 4.4 ± 7.4%, and 19% were at risk of malnutrition. Patient who presented cachexia at diagnosis, were treated with palliative intention, had a Nutriscore ≥ 5 points or presented malnutrition in accordance with PG-SGA had a poorer QL (p < 0.05). Greater WL was associated with a worsened QL (p = 0.001). Breast cancer patients presented an inverse correlation between the %WL and the initial score in the FACT-G (r = - 0.304, p = 0.023), whereas no such correlation was observed for the other types of tumour (r = - 0.012, p = 0.892). CONCLUSIONS: These results underline the relation of NS before starting chemotherapy and QL. Greater WL was associated with a worsened QL, especially in women with breast cancer.
PURPOSE: Among the prognostic factors relevant to the condition of oncological patients, nutritional status (NS) has the greatest single impact on quality of life (QL). The goals of our study were to evaluate the influence of NS, weight loss (WL), and the presence of cachexia, prior to the initiation of chemotherapy, on the patient's QL. METHODS: Adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) diagnosed with solid tumours for whom chemotherapy was started between April 2016 and June 2017 were eligible for inclusion in the study. They were asked to complete a QL questionnaire (Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment (FACT-G)) at the beginning. The presence or absence of cachexia was evaluated at the outset, following the definition proposed by Fearon and nutritional assessment by the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) scale. RESULTS: A total of 177 patients completed the FACT-G, the 60% receiving curative therapy. At the start of the treatment, 58.2% of patients had experienced WL, with an average of 4.4 ± 7.4%, and 19% were at risk of malnutrition. Patient who presented cachexia at diagnosis, were treated with palliative intention, had a Nutriscore ≥ 5 points or presented malnutrition in accordance with PG-SGA had a poorer QL (p < 0.05). Greater WL was associated with a worsened QL (p = 0.001). Breast cancerpatients presented an inverse correlation between the %WL and the initial score in the FACT-G (r = - 0.304, p = 0.023), whereas no such correlation was observed for the other types of tumour (r = - 0.012, p = 0.892). CONCLUSIONS: These results underline the relation of NS before starting chemotherapy and QL. Greater WL was associated with a worsened QL, especially in women with breast cancer.
Entities:
Keywords:
Body-weight trajectory; Cachexia; Nutritional Status; Quality of life
Authors: Ab A Aaldriks; Lydia G M van der Geest; Erik J Giltay; Saskia le Cessie; Johanneke E A Portielje; Bea C Tanis; Johan W R Nortier; Ed Maartense Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2013-04-30 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Mercè Planas; Julia Álvarez-Hernández; Miguel León-Sanz; Sebastián Celaya-Pérez; Krysmarú Araujo; Abelardo García de Lorenzo Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Angel Segura; Josep Pardo; Carlos Jara; Luis Zugazabeitia; Joan Carulla; Ramón de Las Peñas; Encarna García-Cabrera; María Luz Azuara; Josefina Casadó; Carmen Gómez-Candela Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: C Gómez-Candela; M A Canales Albendea; S Palma Milla; R de Paz Arias; J Díaz Gómez; D Rodríguez-Durán; M Villarino-Sanz; L Arribas Hortigüela; R Burgos Peláez Journal: Nutr Hosp Date: 2012 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.057
Authors: Sergio Rodríguez-Cañamero; Ana Isabel Cobo-Cuenca; Juan Manuel Carmona-Torres; Diana Patricia Pozuelo-Carrascosa; Esmeralda Santacruz-Salas; Joseba Aingerun Rabanales-Sotos; Tatiana Cuesta-Mateos; José Alberto Laredo-Aguilera Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2022-04-11 Impact factor: 4.711