Literature DB >> 22818137

Conservative surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: resection margins and long-term oncological control.

Prodromos Philippou1, Majid Shabbir, Peter Malone, Raj Nigam, Asif Muneer, David J Ralph, Suks Minhas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the oncological outcome of penile conserving surgery and identified parameters predicting local recurrence, including resection margins.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 179 patients with invasive penile cancer treated with organ sparing surgery at a tertiary center between 2002 and 2010 fulfilled our study criteria. Demographic, histopathological, management and followup data were recorded in a prospective database. Local, regional and distant recurrence rates, time to recurrence and survival rates were calculated. Survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis was used to identify predictors of local recurrence.
RESULTS: Mean followup was 42.8 months (range 4 to 107). Local, regional and distant metastatic recurrence developed in 16 (8.9%), 19 (10.6%) and 9 patients (5.0%) at a mean of 26.1, 26.8 and 11.7 months, respectively. The 5-year disease specific survival rate after recurrence was 54.7% (95% CI 46.1-63.3). For patients with isolated local recurrence the 5-year disease specific survival rate was 91.7% compared to 38.4% for those with regional recurrence. The overall 5-year local recurrence-free rate was 86.3% (95% CI 82.6-90.4). Tumor grade (p = 0.003), stage (p = 0.021) and lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.014) were identified as predictors of local recurrence on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Penile conserving surgery is oncologically safe and a surgical excision margin of less than 5 mm is adequate. Higher local recurrence rates are associated with lymphovascular invasion, and higher tumor stage and grade. Local recurrence has no negative impact on long-term survival.
Copyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22818137     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  40 in total

1.  Sexual function after surgical treatment for penile cancer: Which organ-sparing approach gives the best results?

Authors:  Omid Sedigh; Marco Falcone; Carlo Ceruti; Massimiliano Timpano; Mirko Preto; Marco Oderda; Franklin Kuehhas; Mattia Sibona; Arianna Gillo; Paolo Gontero; Luigi Rolle; Bruno Frea
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Surgical treatment of primary disease for penile squamous cell carcinoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database analysis.

Authors:  Yao Zhu; Wei-Jie Gu; Hong-Kai Wang; Cheng-Yuan Gu; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 3.  MRI of common penile pathologies and penile prostheses.

Authors:  Abdul-Rahman Abualruz; Ryan O'Malley; Janardhana Ponnatapura; Brenda L Holbert; Pat Whitworth; Rafel Tappouni; Neeraj Lalwani
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09

Review 4.  Male genital premalignant dermatoses.

Authors:  Oliver Kayes; Majid Shabbir; Suks Minhas
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Making surgery safer by centralization of care: impact of case load in penile cancer.

Authors:  Joren Vanthoor; Anita Thomas; Igor Tsaur; Maarten Albersen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Penile preserving and reconstructive surgery in the management of penile cancer.

Authors:  Arthur L Burnett
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 7.  Challenges and controversies in the management of penile cancer.

Authors:  Majid Shabbir; Oliver Kayes; Suks Minhas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 8.  [Reconstructive surgery in penile cancer].

Authors:  M Sohn; M Dietrich; A Wirthmann; U M Rieger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Contemporary management of penile cancer: greater than 15 year MSKCC experience.

Authors:  Kelvin A Moses; Andrew Winer; John P Sfakianos; Stephen A Poon; Matthew Kent; Melanie Bernstein; Paul Russo; Guido Dalbagni
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.344

Review 10.  Review of penile reconstructive techniques.

Authors:  Sverrir Kristinsson; Mark Johnson; David Ralph
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 2.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.