Literature DB >> 22818072

Validation of dynamic 3-dimensional whole heart magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging against fractional flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary artery disease.

Roy Jogiya1, Sebastian Kozerke, Geraint Morton, Kalpa De Silva, Simon Redwood, Divaka Perera, Eike Nagel, Sven Plein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of dynamic 3-dimensional (3D) whole heart myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) against invasively determined fractional flow reserve (FFR) and to establish the correlation between myocardium at risk defined by using the invasive Duke Jeopardy Score (DJS) and noninvasive 3D whole heart myocardial perfusion CMR.
BACKGROUND: 3D whole heart myocardial perfusion CMR overcomes the limited spatial coverage of conventional two-dimensional perfusion CMR methods and allows estimation of the extent of ischemia. The method has shown good diagnostic accuracy for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) as defined by using quantitative coronary angiography. However, quantitative coronary angiography does not provide a functional assessment of CAD as available from pressure wire-derived FFR. In the catheter laboratory, the DJS can complement FFR to estimate the myocardium at risk.
METHODS: Fifty-three patients referred for angiography underwent rest and adenosine stress 3D whole heart myocardial perfusion CMR at 3-T. Perfusion was scored visually on a patient and coronary territory basis, and ischemic burden was calculated by quantitative segmentation of the volume of hypoenhancement. FFR was measured in vessels with ≥50% severity stenosis and an FFR <0.75 considered as hemodynamically significant. The DJS was calculated from the coronary angiograms to quantify the myocardium at risk.
RESULTS: FFR was measured in 64 of 159 coronary vessels, and 39 had an FFR <0.75. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of CMR for the detection of significant CAD were 91%, 90%, and 91%, on a patient basis and 79%, 92%, and 88%, respectively, by coronary territory. There was a strong correlation between the DJS and ischemic burden on CMR (p < 0.0001; Pearson's r = 0.82).
CONCLUSIONS: 3D whole heart myocardial perfusion CMR accurately detects functionally significant CAD as defined by using FFR and provides an assessment of ischemic burden in agreement with the invasive DJS. The accurate detection of significant CAD combined with an estimation of ischemic burden by using 3D myocardial perfusion CMR holds promise for noninvasive guidance of therapy and risk stratification of patients with CAD.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22818072     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  43 in total

Review 1.  Established and emerging cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques for the assessment of stable coronary heart disease and acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  David P Ripley; Manish Motwani; Sven Plein; John P Greenwood
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-10

Review 2.  Advances in stress cardiac MRI and computed tomography.

Authors:  Yasmin S Hamirani; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  Future Cardiol       Date:  2013-09

3.  Variability in quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion analysis.

Authors:  K Bratis; Eike Nagel
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Prognostic value of a new semiquantitative score system for adenosine stress myocardial perfusion by CMR.

Authors:  Sonia Gómez-Revelles; Xavier Rossello; José Díaz-Villanueva; Ignacio López-Lima; Esteban Sciarresi; Mariano Estofán; Francesc Carreras; Sandra Pujadas; Guillem Pons-Lladó
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Free-breathing cardiac MR stress perfusion with real-time slice tracking.

Authors:  Tamer A Basha; Sébastien Roujol; Kraig V Kissinger; Beth Goddu; Sophie Berg; Warren J Manning; Reza Nezafat
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  The assessment of ischaemic burden: validation of a functional jeopardy score against cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Shazia T Hussain; Geraint Morton; Kalpa De Silva; Roy Jogiya; Andreas Schuster; Matthias Paul; Divaka Perera; Eike Nagel
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 7.  Highlights of the year in JACC 2012.

Authors:  Anthony N DeMaria; Jeroen J Bax; Gregory K Feld; Barry H Greenberg; Jennifer L Hall; Mark A Hlatky; Wilbur Y W Lew; João A C Lima; Ehtisham Mahmud; Alan S Maisel; Sanjiv M Narayan; Steven E Nissen; David J Sahn; Sotirios Tsimikas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 8.  Cardiac MRI and Ischemic Heart Disease: Role in Diagnosis and Risk Stratification.

Authors:  Rahul N Sawlani; Jeremy D Collins
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.113

9.  Peri-infarct ischaemia assessed by cardiovascular MRI: comparison with quantitative perfusion single photon emission CT imaging.

Authors:  E Gerbaud; H Cochet; E Bullier; C Ragot; S H Gilbert; H Douard; Y Pucheu; F Laurent; P Coste; L Bordenave; M Montaudon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Integrated cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with coronary magnetic resonance angiography, stress-perfusion, and delayed-enhancement imaging for the detection of occult coronary artery disease in asymptomatic individuals.

Authors:  Kyoung Doo Song; Sung Mok Kim; Yeon Hyeon Choe; Wooin Jung; Sang-Chol Lee; Sung-A Chang; Yoon Ho Choi; Jidong Sung
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.