Literature DB >> 22817977

Assessment of liver tumor response by high-field (3 T) MRI after radiofrequency ablation: short- and mid-term evolution of diffusion parameters within the ablation zone.

Tri-Linh Lu1, Fabio Becce, Pierre Bize, Alban Denys, Reto Meuli, Sabine Schmidt.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of malignant liver lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) before and after successful radiofrequency ablation (RF ablation).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with 43 malignant liver lesions (23/20: metastases/hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC)) underwent liver MRI (3.0 T) before (<1 month) and after RF ablation (at 1, 3 and 6 months) using T2-, gadolinium-enhanced T1- and DWI-weighted MR sequences. Jointly, two radiologists prospectively measured ADCs for each lesion by means of two different regions of interest (ROIs), first including the whole lesion and secondly the area with the visibly most restricted diffusion (MRDA) on ADC map. Changes of ADCs were evaluated with ANOVA and Dunnett tests.
RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were successfully treated, while one patient was excluded due to focal recurrence. In metastases (n=22), the ADC in the whole lesion and in MRDA showed an up-and-down evolution. In HCC (n=20), the evolution of ADC was more complex, but with significantly higher values (p=0.013) at 1 and 6 months after RF ablation.
CONCLUSION: The ADC values of malignant liver lesions successfully treated by RF ablation show a predictable evolution and may help radiologists to monitor tumor response after treatment.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22817977     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  10 in total

Review 1.  Assessing locoregional treatment response to Hepatocellular Carcinoma: comparison of hepatobiliary contrast agents to extracellular contrast agents.

Authors:  Anum Aslam; Amita Kamath; Bradley Spieler; Mark Maschiocchi; Carl F Sabottke; Victoria Chernyak; Sara C Lewis
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-04-15

Review 2.  Cancer concepts and principles: primer for the interventional oncologist-part I.

Authors:  Ryan Hickey; Michael Vouche; Daniel Y Sze; Elias Hohlastos; Jeremy Collins; Todd Schirmang; Khairuddin Memon; Robert K Ryu; Kent Sato; Richard Chen; Ramona Gupta; Scott Resnick; James Carr; Howard B Chrisman; Albert A Nemcek; Robert L Vogelzang; Robert J Lewandowski; Riad Salem
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 3.  Prognostication and response assessment in liver and pancreatic tumors: The new imaging.

Authors:  Riccardo De Robertis; Paolo Tinazzi Martini; Emanuele Demozzi; Gino Puntel; Silvia Ortolani; Sara Cingarlini; Andrea Ruzzenente; Alfredo Guglielmi; Giampaolo Tortora; Claudio Bassi; Paolo Pederzoli; Mirko D'Onofrio
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Real-time monitoring of radiofrequency ablation and postablation assessment: accuracy of contrast-enhanced US in experimental rat liver model.

Authors:  Hanping Wu; Luke R Wilkins; Nicholas P Ziats; John R Haaga; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  Imaging after percutaneous thermal and non-thermal ablation of hepatic tumour: normal appearances, progression and complications.

Authors:  Germain Bréhier; Louis Besnier; Anaïs Delagnes; Frédéric Oberti; Jérôme Lebigot; Christophe Aubé; Anita Paisant
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 6.  The Role of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) in Locoregional Therapy Outcome Prediction and Response Assessment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): The New Era of Functional Imaging Biomarkers.

Authors:  Johannes M Ludwig; Juan C Camacho; Nima Kokabi; Minzhi Xing; Hyun S Kim
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2015-11-30

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the cirrhotic liver: diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and evaluation of response to treatment - Part 2.

Authors:  Miguel Ramalho; António P Matos; Mamdoh AlObaidy; Fernanda Velloni; Ersan Altun; Richard C Semelka
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr

8.  The feasibility of superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for assessing liver lesions in patients with contraindications for iodine CT contrast media or gadolinium-based MR contrast media: a retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Chishio Kurata; Kazuhiro Saito; Natsuhiko Shirota; Yoichi Araki; Katsutoshi Sugimoto; Yu Tajima; Daisuke Yunaiyama
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-09

9.  Multimode tumor ablation therapy induced different diffusion and microvasculature related parameters change on functional magnetic resonance imaging compared to radiofrequency ablation in liver tumor: An observational study.

Authors:  Guangyuan Zhang; Wentao Li; Guangzhi Wang; Xinhong He; Lichao Xu; Shengping Wang; Weijun Peng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 10.  Evaluation of liver tumour response by imaging.

Authors:  Jules Gregory; Marco Dioguardi Burgio; Giuseppe Corrias; Valérie Vilgrain; Maxime Ronot
Journal:  JHEP Rep       Date:  2020-04-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.