Literature DB >> 2281754

Quantification of bone healing. Comparison of QCT, SPA, MRI, and DEXA in dog osteotomies.

M D Markel1, M A Wikenheiser, R L Morin, D G Lewallen, E Y Chao.   

Abstract

Four noninvasive imaging modalities were used to quantitatively evaluate and compare tibial osteotomy healing in dogs. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), single-photon absorptiometry (SPA), and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) were the four techniques examined. Bilateral tibial osteotomies were performed in 32 dogs divided into four groups. The osteotomies were stabilized with a 2-mm gap using unilateral external skeletal fixation. Dogs were anesthetized, imaged with the four noninvasive techniques, and killed at 2-12 weeks. Invasive techniques were used to determine: 1) the torsional properties of the bone; and 2) the local stiffness properties and calcium content within the bone. The techniques which had the strongest associations with the torsional properties of the osteotomies were QCT, SPA and DEXA. Generally, QCT and SPA had marginally stronger correlations than DEXA; but, overall, there were no differences between the techniques. MRI had the poorest associations with the torsional properties of the osteotomies. Generally, QCT had the strongest correlations with local material properties, such as indentation stiffness and calcium content. SPA had the second strongest correlations with calcium content and had the third strongest correlations with indentation stiffness behind DEXA. DEXA had the third strongest correlations for calcium content. With the exception of some of the correlations with indentation stiffness, MRI had the poorest associations with the local parameters studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2281754     DOI: 10.3109/17453679008993569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  8 in total

1.  Quantification of the microstructural anisotropy of distraction osteogenesis in the rabbit tibia.

Authors:  Kevin B Jones; Nozomu Inoue; John E Tis; Edward F McCarthy; Kathleen A McHale; Edmund Y S Chao
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2005

2.  Noninvasive quantitative assessment of bone healing after distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Oladapo M Babatunde; Austin T Fragomen; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2009-08-18

3.  No positive bone healing after using platelet rich plasma in a skeletal defect. An observational prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Joost C Peerbooms; Joost W Colaris; Anita A Hakkert; Mark Van Appeldorn; Daniël J Bruijn; Brenda L Den Oudsten; Taco Gosens
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Fusion mass bone quality after uninstrumented spinal fusion in older patients.

Authors:  Thomas Andersen; Finn B Christensen; Bente L Langdahl; Carsten Ernst; Søren Fruensgaard; Jørgen Ostergaard; Jens Langer Andersen; Sten Rasmussen; Bent Niedermann; Kristian Høy; Peter Helmig; Randi Holm; Bent Erling Lindblad; Ebbe Stender Hansen; Niels Egund; Cody Bünger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  LCP external fixation--external application of an internal fixator: two cases and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Colin Yi-Loong Woon; Merng-Koon Wong; Tet-Sen Howe
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Healing of long-term frozen orthotopic bone allografts is not affected by MHC differences between donor and recipient.

Authors:  Olav Reikerås; Finn P Reinholt; Severin Zinöcker; Hamid Shegarfi; Bent Rolstad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Rivaroxaban does not impair fracture healing in a rat femur fracture model: an experimental study.

Authors:  Tim Klüter; Matthias Weuster; Stefan Brüggemann; Leif Menzdorf; Stefanie Fitschen-Oestern; Nadine Steubesand; Yahya Acil; Thomas Pufe; Deike Varoga; Andreas Seekamp; Sebastian Lippross
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 8.  Bone Union Assessment with Computed Tomography (CT) and Statistical Associations with Mechanical or Histological Testing: A Systematic Review of Animal Studies.

Authors:  A Willems; C Iҫli; J H Waarsing; S M A Bierma-Zeinstra; D E Meuffels
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 4.333

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.