Literature DB >> 22816275

Determination of insoluble, soluble, and total dietary fiber (CODEX definition) by enzymatic-gravimetric method and liquid chromatography: collaborative study.

Barry V McCleary1, Jonathan W DeVries, Jeanne I Rader, Gerald Cohen, Leon Prosky, David C Mugford, Kazuhiro Okuma.   

Abstract

A method for the determination of insoluble (IDF), soluble (SDF), and total dietary fiber (TDF), as defined by the CODEX Alimentarius, was validated in foods. Based upon the principles of AOAC Official Methods 985.29, 991.43, 2001.03, and 2002.02, the method quantitates water-insoluble and water-soluble dietary fiber. This method extends the capabilities of the previously adopted AOAC Official Method 2009.01, Total Dietary Fiber in Foods, Enzymatic-Gravimetric-Liquid Chromatographic Method, applicable to plant material, foods, and food ingredients consistent with CODEX Definition 2009, including naturally occurring, isolated, modified, and synthetic polymers meeting that definition. The method was evaluated through an AOAC/AACC collaborative study. Twenty-two laboratories participated, with 19 laboratories returning valid assay data for 16 test portions (eight blind duplicates) consisting of samples with a range of traditional dietary fiber, resistant starch, and nondigestible oligosaccharides. The dietary fiber content of the eight test pairs ranged from 10.45 to 29.90%. Digestion of samples under the conditions of AOAC 2002.02 followed by the isolation, fractionation, and gravimetric procedures of AOAC 985.29 (and its extensions 991.42 and 993.19) and 991.43 results in quantitation of IDF and soluble dietary fiber that precipitates (SDFP). The filtrate from the quantitation of water-alcohol-insoluble dietary fiber is concentrated, deionized, concentrated again, and analyzed by LC to determine the SDF that remains soluble (SDFS), i.e., all dietary fiber polymers of degree of polymerization = 3 and higher, consisting primarily, but not exclusively, of oligosaccharides. SDF is calculated as the sum of SDFP and SDFS. TDF is calculated as the sum of IDF and SDF. The within-laboratory variability, repeatability SD (Sr), for IDF ranged from 0.13 to 0.71, and the between-laboratory variability, reproducibility SD (SR), for IDF ranged from 0.42 to 2.24. The within-laboratory variability Sr for SDF ranged from 0.28 to 1.03, and the between-laboratory variability SR for SDF ranged from 0.85 to 1.66. The within-laboratory variability Sr for TDF ranged from 0.47 to 1.41, and the between-laboratory variability SR for TDF ranged from 0.95 to 3.14. This is comparable to other official and approved dietary fiber methods, and the method is recommended for adoption as Official First Action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22816275     DOI: 10.5740/jaoacint.cs2011_25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AOAC Int        ISSN: 1060-3271            Impact factor:   1.913


  26 in total

1.  Perspective: Closing the Dietary Fiber Gap: An Ancient Solution for a 21st Century Problem.

Authors:  Henry J Thompson; Mark A Brick
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 2.  The association between dietary fibre deficiency and high-income lifestyle-associated diseases: Burkitt's hypothesis revisited.

Authors:  Stephen J O'Keefe
Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-12

Review 3.  Microbial degradation of whole-grain complex carbohydrates and impact on short-chain fatty acids and health.

Authors:  Knud Erik Bach Knudsen
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 8.701

4.  Growth performance, visceral organ weights, and gut health of weaned pigs fed diets with different dietary fiber solubility and lipid sources.

Authors:  Jinsu Hong; Saymore Petros Ndou; Seidu Adams; Joy Scaria; Tofuko Awori Woyengo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.338

5.  Soybean meal allergenic protein degradation and gut health of piglets fed protease-supplemented diets.

Authors:  Sangwoo Park; Jung Wook Lee; Aaron J Cowieson; Guenter Pappenberger; Tofuko Awori Woyengo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  The apparent ileal digestibility and the apparent total tract digestibility of carbohydrates and energy in hybrid rye are different from some other cereal grains when fed to growing pigs.

Authors:  Molly L McGhee; Hans H Stein
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  An Optimized, Slowly Digested Savory Cluster Reduced Postprandial Glucose and Insulin Responses in Healthy Human Subjects.

Authors:  Thomas M S Wolever; Alexandra L Jenkins; Jun Yang; Mark Nisbet; Jodee Johnson; YiFang Chu; Yang Pan
Journal:  Curr Dev Nutr       Date:  2019-01-17

8.  Dietary fiber, starch, and sugars in bananas at different stages of ripeness in the retail market.

Authors:  Katherine M Phillips; Ryan C McGinty; Garret Couture; Pamela R Pehrsson; Kyle McKillop; Naomi K Fukagawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Black Beans, Fiber, and Antioxidant Capacity Pilot Study: Examination of Whole Foods vs. Functional Components on Postprandial Metabolic, Oxidative Stress, and Inflammation in Adults with Metabolic Syndrome.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Reverri; Jody M Randolph; Francene M Steinberg; C Tissa Kappagoda; Indika Edirisinghe; Britt M Burton-Freeman
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) and cereals differently affect gut development in broiler chickens and young pigs.

Authors:  Haoyu Liu; Emma Ivarsson; Torbjörn Lundh; Jan Erik Lindberg
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2013-12-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.