OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the time dependency of the endothelium-dependent and -independent vascular responses after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting (DEB) or plain balloons, bare-metal (BMS), and drug-eluting (DES) stents, or controls. BACKGROUND: Long-term endothelial dysfunction after DES implantation is associated with delayed healing and late thrombosis. METHODS: Domestic pigs underwent PCI using DEB or plain balloon, BMS, or DES. The dilated and stented segments, and the proximal reference segments of stents and control arteries were explanted at 5-h, 24-h, 1-week, and 1-month follow-up (FUP). Endothelin-induced vasoconstriction and endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation of the arterial segments were determined in vitro and were related to histological results. RESULTS: DES- and BMS-treated arteries showed proneness to vasoconstriction 5 h post-PCI. The endothelium-dependent vasodilation was profoundly (p < 0.05) impaired early after PCI (9.8 ± 3.7%, 13.4 ± 9.2%, 5.7 ± 5.3%, and 7.6 ± 4.7% using plain balloon, DEB, BMS, and DES, respectively), as compared with controls (49.6 ± 9.5%), with slow recovery. In contrast to DES, the endothelium-related vasodilation of vessels treated with plain balloon, DEB, and BMS was increased at 1 month, suggesting enhanced endogenous nitric oxide production of the neointima. The endothelium-independent (vascular smooth muscle-related) vasodilation decreased significantly at 1 day, with slow normalization during FUP. All PCI-treated vessels exhibited imbalance between vasoconstriction-vasodilation, which was more pronounced in DES- and BMS-treated vessels. No correlation between histological parameters and vasomotor function was found, indicating complex interactions between the healing neoendothelium and smooth muscle post-PCI. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary arteries treated with plain balloon, DEB, BMS, and DES showed time-dependent loss of endothelial-dependent and -independent vasomotor function, with imbalanced contraction/dilation capacity.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the time dependency of the endothelium-dependent and -independent vascular responses after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting (DEB) or plain balloons, bare-metal (BMS), and drug-eluting (DES) stents, or controls. BACKGROUND: Long-term endothelial dysfunction after DES implantation is associated with delayed healing and late thrombosis. METHODS:Domestic pigs underwent PCI using DEB or plain balloon, BMS, or DES. The dilated and stented segments, and the proximal reference segments of stents and control arteries were explanted at 5-h, 24-h, 1-week, and 1-month follow-up (FUP). Endothelin-induced vasoconstriction and endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation of the arterial segments were determined in vitro and were related to histological results. RESULTS:DES- and BMS-treated arteries showed proneness to vasoconstriction 5 h post-PCI. The endothelium-dependent vasodilation was profoundly (p < 0.05) impaired early after PCI (9.8 ± 3.7%, 13.4 ± 9.2%, 5.7 ± 5.3%, and 7.6 ± 4.7% using plain balloon, DEB, BMS, and DES, respectively), as compared with controls (49.6 ± 9.5%), with slow recovery. In contrast to DES, the endothelium-related vasodilation of vessels treated with plain balloon, DEB, and BMS was increased at 1 month, suggesting enhanced endogenous nitric oxide production of the neointima. The endothelium-independent (vascular smooth muscle-related) vasodilation decreased significantly at 1 day, with slow normalization during FUP. All PCI-treated vessels exhibited imbalance between vasoconstriction-vasodilation, which was more pronounced in DES- and BMS-treated vessels. No correlation between histological parameters and vasomotor function was found, indicating complex interactions between the healing neoendothelium and smooth muscle post-PCI. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary arteries treated with plain balloon, DEB, BMS, and DES showed time-dependent loss of endothelial-dependent and -independent vasomotor function, with imbalanced contraction/dilation capacity.
Authors: Upendra Kaul; Martin Unverdorben; Ralf Degenhardt; Ashok Seth; Vinay K Bahl; Shirish M S Hiremath; Praveen Chandra; Ajit S Mullesari; P S Sandhu; Seshagiri Rao; Oommen George; Hanns Ackermann; Michael Boxberger Journal: Indian Heart J Date: 2013-09-13
Authors: Mark W Majesky; Henrick Horita; Allison Ostriker; Sizhao Lu; Jenna N Regan; Ashim Bagchi; Xiu Rong Dong; Joanna Poczobutt; Raphael A Nemenoff; Mary C M Weiser-Evans Journal: Circ Res Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Victor Nauffal; Thomas A Schwann; Maroun B Yammine; Abdul-Karim M El-Hage-Sleiman; Mohamad H El Zein; Ameer Kabour; Milo C Engoren; Robert H Habib Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2015-02-10 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Noemi Pavo; Eslam Samaha; Inna Sabdyusheva; Rembert Pogge von Strandmann; Stefanie Stahnke; Christian A Plass; Katrin Zlabinger; Dominika Lukovic; Zoltan Jambrik; Imre J Pavo; Jutta Bergler-Klein; William A Gray; Gerald Maurer; Mariann Gyöngyösi Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 3.896